Nailhead: what did Buick do to deserve that less than flattering name for its legendary V8 engine from the mid-fifties to the mid sixties? Hemi-head; even flat head are much more lyrical. For those not familiar with Buick’s unusual valve arrangement, we’ll do a primer on that, as well as touch on its brief glory days on the drag strip. But for those already enlightened on the subject, I offer something more: the source and possible explanation of its unusual valve arrangement.
Buick came late to the OHV V8 game, Cadillac and Olds both having introduced their superb engines in 1949. Buick’s venerable straight eight from the thirties at least had overhead valves, unlike the previous Cadillac and Olds flathead engines. That allowed it to stay in the post war game a bit longer with higher compression and multiple carburation. But it was heavy, and not at all suitable for a the horsepower war of the fifties that was quickly developing.
In 1953, Buick brought out their new V8, with a very large 4″ bore and quite short 3.2″ stroke, the most oversquare engine on the market at that time. It displaced 322 cubic inches (5.3 L) , and came in 164 to 188 hp variants. In 1954, a small-bore version with 264 CID (4.3 L) reserved for the low end Special arrived.
The new Buick V8 was rather light and compact for its time, weighing some 625 lbs. It was built with very high quality forgings, and quickly caught the eye of hot rodders, this being a few years before the Chevy small block came on the market. Its unusual head and valve arrangement made it a narrow engine, increasing its appeal to engine swappers, like this one replacing the six in an old Chevy. But it was precisely that narrow head that also presented serious challenges.
Here’s a nice cutaway of the Buick nailhead engine. What instantly stands out is the unusual arrangement of the valves and valve train, in that they hang vertically in a pent-head or almost hemi-head combustion chamber. We’ll discuss the origins of this later, but note how tortured the exhaust port is, having to make an almost 180 degree bend right behind its valve.
Just for comparison sake, here’s a cross section of a more typical V8 (AMC). The valves have a mild angle in relation to the head, creating a more typical “wedge head” combustion chamber. Perhaps the most obvious thing about the Buick nailhead is that its arrangement demands very small valves, which seems antithetical to the whole concept of the modern V8 in the first place.
And small they were, hence the “nail head” moniker. The early engines had a 1.75″ intake and a 1.25″ exhaust valve, puny even for the mid fifties. Even the legendary Wildcat 401 from the mid sixties had only a 1.875″ intake and a 1.5″ exhaust; both substantially smaller than the much smaller Chevy engine.
The explanation generally given is that Buick was focusing on torque rather than maximum breathing at high rpm. And the Buick engines delivered that in spades, typically with more than one ft. lb. per cubic inch, a very respectable output indeed. In the sixties, Buick labeled and advertised their engines on their torque output, not the horsepower, which can be confusing. This Wildcat 445 is a 401 from a 1966 Skylark GS with 325 hp.
Buick had to use very aggressive camshafts in order to make the nailhead work. By opening the little valves early, and very quickly, much of their limitations were overcome, up to a point. Already the first 322 nailhead had a camshaft that was the equivalent of a “super race cam” at the time; one that would be typically installed from an aftermarket supplier. The intake duration was 282 degrees, and the exhaust 292 degrees, with a 67 degree overlap, along with very steep ramps for extra rapid valve opening.
The camshaft in the 401s were even more aggressive, and those engines were known for their lumpy idle. Not exactly the image Buick typically was trying to convey at the times, with a banker’s Electra 225.
Hot rodders found out early that the Buick’s breathing limitations could be overcome by creative solutions. Intake manifolds with every possible combination of carburetors known to homo hotrodius were fabricated.
Supercharging was an obvious route, by forcing more air through the small ports. Here’s an excellent reprint of a 1954 Hot Rod Magazine article detailing perhaps the first blown nailhead (above), with gobs of technical info on the then new Buick engine.
Hot rodders were drawn to the Buick nonetheless, at least for a few years before the Chevy and Chrysler hemi established their supremacy. Undoubtedly the most creative and bizarre one of all (above) reversed the valve arrangement totally, using a front crank-driven blower to force air through the tiny tortured exhausts, allowing the larger and smooth intakes to now function as exhausts. Take a close look: unbelievable!
The biggest racing fan of the nailhead was TV Tommy Ivo, who started with one in his very successful rail, added a second, and eventually built this legendary quad-nailhead four wheel drive monster. Here’s more nailhead racing history.
The nailhead eventually grew to 425 cubic inches in 1963 for its final three years. In 1967, a whole new Buick generation of V8s appeared, with a very conventional head indeed. I suspect that that the Buick’s pent head was notoriously dirty, and Buick saw the writing on the wall in terms of the coming emission regulations. It’s a curious contrast to the Oldsmobile V8, whose combustion chamber was the exact opposite: it had a very shallow valve angle, and the basic Olds combustion head design survived as one of the last of its breed; in fact the Olds 307 was the last V8 to meet emission regs with a carburetor in 1990.
So now to my theory about the origins of the nailhead’s unusual design. In 1951, Harley Earl’s famous LeSabre concept appeared, with a radically advanced 3.5 liter (216 CID) aluminum V8 that ran on both gas and methanol. It was supercharged and was rated at 339 hp. Years ago, as a kid, I stumbled on a cross section of the LeSabre engine, and was struck by a certain specific similarity to the nailhead.
The little Buick engine had hemispherical/pent roofed heads, but with its valves in the classic formation allowing for large valve diameters. If you look at the intakes on this, one can see that the nailhead used the same unusual arrangement, but for both its valves. The LeSabre/XP 300 engine’s exhaust push rods had a wild arrangement, and were designed to fit into the block between each cylinder.
I can’t help but assume that this first OHV engine by Buick showed a strong interest in the hemi/pent roof head, and that perhaps Buick even considered building a true hemi version of the nailhead (Chrysler hemi above, with more typical pushrod/valve train configuration). Or it least, that was the starting point. if so, it rather backed them into a corner, with little valves and a combustion chamber that in the longer run was not so ideal.
The way to really look at the nailhead is this: it’s similar to a typical four-valve per cylinder head of today, but with two of the valves missing. That’s negating the whole advantage of the hemi head: room for more and/or bigger valves. Buick took a half step, but one that left an enduring legacy nevertheless.

















Wild, man. I know the whole “rat rod” thing is kinda played out but I’d love a 1950s Roadmaster rat rodded out with nailhead power, although I wouldn’t attach it to a “Dyna-sloooooooooow” transmission.
Love that pic of Tommy Ivo, wearing a bow tie and looking like a model citizen. I’d love to see today’s racers still dressed like that when not behind the wheel of their cars.
“Love that pic of Tommy Ivo, wearing a bow tie and looking like a model citizen. I’d love to see today’s racers still dressed like that when not behind the wheel of their cars.”
That is pretty awesome, Kinda like when you look back at old adverts for work trucks and the driver has a full uniform on.
Some of us do dress like that when we’re not racing or working on cars… Many of todays youth have lost touch with something called class.
MY DAD HAD A 51′ BUICK AVEC DYNAFLOW . I REMEMBER THE ENGINE RACING IN OUR DRIVEWAY WITH THE CAR BARELY MOVING FORWARD .
The unidentified engine looks like a Y block Ford. (Guess not
)
A friend of mine had a 63 Riv with the 401. He nearly drove himself nuts trying to get to idle smooth because a “mechanic” told him it should. This eventually resulted in a replacement engine.
The only drawback I could ever see in that car was the Super Turbine 400.. What a PIG. That mill could have made 800 ft/lb of torque, it would all get sopped up in that trans.
Sorry; I decided this wasn’t quite the place for a guessing game. It’s an AMC, just because it was convenient.
I doubt that it was a SuperTurbine 400. The ’63 still had a Dynaflow, the ST400 didn’t come out until ’64
AMC? Cutting engineering there…
(j/k)
Good article, Paul. Any insight as to why Buick power kept appearing in more industrial applications – such as the Flxible bus line, and later, the whole Kaiser Jeep lineup? I’m sure cost and excess manufacturing capacity had something to do with it; but was there more?
Actually, the 304/343/401 AMC was a perfectly decent engine for its day; no?
The nailhead’s excellent torque curve and the use of high quality components, I have to assume.
True, that…the AMC V8s were state of the art when conceived.
You’ve probably heard the story of how they came to be: That Kaiser-Frasier had a V8 project, in the person of a single designer, with the project well along when Bank of America, their primary lender, pulled the plug on any additional credit against their losses. They dismissed most of the passenger-car people, sold the tooling to Argentina, and focused on their recent purchase, Willys.
That V8 designer, the name escapes me, was hired by the nascent American Motors…to (surprise!) design a V8 – which he had completed in “record time.” So…the AMC V8 was actually a Kaiser…long before the whole of AMC was the remnants of Kaiser Jeep.
I think you’re talking about the old AMC V8 from the fifties? This is the the one that came out in mid sixties.
I must agree on both points here…..A.M.C. did have fine motors as was the buick nail head, nail heads were easy to work on ‘
Hmmmmmmmm well the buses couldn’t of required narrow engines, although the buckets of torque were likely a good thing in the bus builder’s mind. I once drove a U-hall across country (24 ft box) powered by a HD 350SBC and a three speed auto. I likely would have had an easier time with a Nailhead under the hood.
Strictly speaking, the Flxible Clipper used the old Buick straight eight. The Blue Bird bus CC has a nailhead, but I can’t absolutely assure it is the original engine. But Buick engines had a good rep for being rugged, and that would make it appealing for a bus operator.
So, as I get it, it’s the equivalent of a SOHC/DOHC arrangement? But for overhead valve pushrods? Interesting, one learns something everyday. It seems the engine was designed for double overhead valves, but they had to do with a single, and that’s why it was so narrow. Do you know why, and what happened? Are there more examples of quad cam pushrods? I always thoght that was an exclusive OHC arrangement.
“Are there more examples of quad cam pushrods? ”
Are you referring to the LeSabre/XP 300 engine? I’m not sure what you mean.
There were other ways to do a hemi-head pushrod engine than that arrangement for sure. The Bristol/nee BMW 328 design was one elegant solution, but I can’t find an image. And the Chrysler used the more typical approach:
I’m not really sure what I mean either. What I’m getting at is that the XP300 engine looks like a DOHC engine, though it’s overhead valve, pushrods and rocker arms. Both cylinder banks has two rows of valves. And the nailhead looks like it was designed like that from the start, with one of each rows deleted. Like designing a DOHC engine from start, then switching to SOHC along the way. My question was, are there similar pushrod engines where each cylinder bank has two rows of valves each? And I guess the Chrysler Hemi was the answer to that question. I was just curious, that’s all…
You have a DS, right? It has a pushrod hemi head, like so many other Citroens, from the 2CV to the DS. Peugeots did too; etc.They all pretty much are similar in arrangement to the Chrysler hemi, which was of course just copying long-established European tradition.
There were also lots of SOHC hemi engines; the BMWs being typical of the breed. They simply used rockers from the cam mounted between the two valves to actuate them instead of pushrods or two individual cams directly over each bank of valves.
What makes the LeSabre/XP 300 engine unique is that the pushrods come up through the block at that angle; never seen that anywhere else before.
Yes, I have a DS. Technically, it’s a DSpecial, the successor to the ID, the cheapo variant of the DS. It’s a 1975, one of the very last, they only made a couple of hundred that year. But yes, I forgot about that one. It didn’t cross my mind, as in my mind, virtually all straight fours in recently modern times were pushrod hemis, at least up until the 80′s. I just got so tangled up in my mind about V-engines in this thread.
For budgetary reasons, Citroen couldn’t afford a new engine for the DS. But they designed a new cross flow hemi head to the old traction avant engine. If I am to be totally honest, I have actually no clue whatsoever to how that really looks like technically. I have to check it out. You don’t really buy a Citroen for the engine.
Though, I dream of substituting that for a Corvair six. Or perhaps the complete drivetrain from a Prius. The Citroen freaks usually say you could run the entire car from the generator that pumps up the pressure for the hydraulic system. And that really isn’t that far from having an EV or hybrid engine run the complete car entirely.
The flathead Lycoming V8 in the prewar Cord had valves operating where you find the horizontal pushrods of the Buick experimental Le Sabre. I think I have its crossection somewhere.
I see a center mounted cam in there….No S.O.C.K. or D.O.C.K. here as I’ve worked on the 427 Ford SOCKs
The Riley four was a twin cam pushrod engine mounted very high on either side of the block to give a hemi-head, one of the first infact.
The ultimate development of this engine was a V8 fitted to the Riley Autovia. In this configuration it used three cams, one shared inlet at the centre of the ‘V’ and two outside cams controlling the exhaust.
Here is a picture of one:
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBNQVqmCjnBU2qGR34sjHb1JixcGr0mWs9R9BSsp_N0NGzOsrvpg&t=1
It may look like a DOHC, but they are rocker covers.
Thanks. You joggled some very dormant and faint memories with that. I love the creative and unique solutions engineers used to come up with.
Let’s not forget the most unique application of Buick power: twin Nailheads powered the AG330 start cart, which fired up the big Pratt & Whitney J58s on the SR-71 Blackbird via a vertical driveshaft.
Nice pic of one, I see what you mean, that’s definitely a nailhead.
Seeing one of those things in person (at Seattle’s Museum of Flight) checked off a box in my lifetime To Do list. Unfortunately, I’ll probably never get to check off the box next to “Hear a start cart running at wide open throttle.”
That would still pale next to hearing the SR-71 at full throttle
I’m somewhat familiar to the SR-71 AG330 start carts – the ones used when I was stationed at Beale AFB 1969-1973. They were twin Buick 455′s linked by a torque converter and connected to the J-58′s via a very large, flexible drive shaft. Full open headers and little else. What a sweet sound (racket to some) they made – they sounded like you were at a drag race! You had to spin those J-58′s to a certain rpm until the “fire” – THB – would catch the JP7 and ignition would occur at around 3,200 rpm. Miles away in my barracks room, when a Blackbird was at the engine pad being worked on, at full throttle, you’d swear a Saturn V bound for the moon was taking off! Ahhh…memories…
It may not be the best performance-wise, but a dressed-up multi-carb Nailhead is a beautiful looking engine.
Thanks for this wonderful article. I just love old Buicks . That reversed-port blown engine in the rail is really clever.
Of course one mustn’t forget the Rover V8 which is another variant and of course directly related to the 215 (to call it an ex-Buick engine does a great disservice to Rover engineers who basically redesigned almost every feature of the engine as a result of having far more aluminium casting experience).
The Oldsmobile 215 is also the only American designed engine (at least the block) to win the F1 world championship, notwithstanding it had OHC (eventually DOHC).
Glad someone mentioned the start cart, one is on display on the Intrepid flight deck right next to the SR-71 it was designed to start. As for the Corvair-powered DS, wasn’t that car originally designed for a flat-6? Wouldn’t be too much of a reach then.
Buick and GM have taken plenty of heat for letting the aluminum V8 go, but they really didn’t, as the second-gen V8 was basically a cast-iron development of the same engine. And it was comparable in weight to a small-block Chevy, even as a 455.
Thought I typed in a sentence about Cord Lycoming V8 having its flathead configuraton with similar high central camshaft for horizontal valves. If
this flies maybe I will try sticking a pic of its crossection .
I can’t remember the source, but the reason for the narrow engine, and in turn the vertical valves, was that Buick was caught with its pants down by the ’49 Olds and Caddy OHV V8s. Buick realized it needed a V8, if for nothing more than image, but couldn’t fit the wide Olds or Caddy engines between its front suspension towers, hence the narrow Nailhead.
For Tommy Ivo, image was an important component of what he was selling. His television background taught him the importance of that. From Tom Cotter’s biography, “TV Tommy Ivo: Drag Racing’s Master Showman”, one learns that Ivo wasn’t interested in championships or trophies (in fact he often sold the trophies he had won back to the promoters), but he was interested in purses. Ivo treated drag racing as a business and maintained a brutal touring schedule. The Nailhead had good low end torque and was reliable. Ivo claims that he didn’t have to hammer his Nailhead for that reason. Rarely did Ivo have to miss an engagement due to engine failure.
What I heard/read was that Buick/GM wanted the V8 for the old body, the one for the straight-8. They wanted the V8 to fit into the long & thin hole for the straight-8, so the engine was designed to be as thin as possible.
i have read alot of comments but what i am looking for is info on supercharged nailheads from factory gm and government would not let out for public purchace due to tq specs. any info?
and if any 350 chevy guys read this check the specs,stock 401buick,325hp,445ft.lb. tq. chevy,270hp.280-325 ft.lb. tq.and the buick is only 30 lbs.heavier than the chev,not to mention the peak tq.is at 2800rpms,i built a 1974 pinto wagon u sat in the back seat to drive the motor was in the front seat,nothing under the hood but radiator and battery,the425 had 257000 miles on it when we pulled it from my uncles 57 chevy belaire,9inch ford rear,370 gears,switch pitch automatic with 400 guts,2800-3200 stall converter,dual 650 carter afb carbs,it was bored 030 over and balanced before it went into the 57,evey time we ran on the streets it jumped EVERYBODY 6-8 cars out of the hole,the driveshaft was less than a foot long,the whole car costed $1600 to build and guys with 50k just in their engines were scared to run it. at3200 lbs. and on roadhugger radials at the strip it ran 12.7@107. we sold the car years ago but recently seen it at a local car show,the new owner is a lying douch who tried to give a false account of what HEdid to it, but the ford blue stripe i put from oil pan to trans pan said it all, i am willing to bet that nailhead has over 325000 on it and would not be surprised.REMEMBER,NAILHEADS ARE MEANT TO BE HAMMERD
super !!!
http://www.piccobello.biz
My first car was a 57 Buick Special. An older couple had it and the back seat still had the factory plastic cover on it! This was 1968 and I was 18 at the time. Really liked the car, but the dynaflow kinda sucked. The 364 had torque though. One time I power-braked it and tore the engine mount in half. The engine rotated under the hood and destroyed the distributor which was mounted at the rear of the engine. So after that I was a little more careful…
Torque City USA! My right hand engine mount on my ’60 Invicta Flat-Top was ripped as well. The air cleaner would smack the inside of the hood. Great engine. Had another 401 Nailhead in a ’65 Riviera. What a car.
Very glad this article was brought back as I am new here.
Excellent write-up. I learned a lot. Thank you!!!
have a 1965 buick lesabre 400 it is suppsed to have a 401 nailhead is this so. i have the engine # looks like #1366895F 2GM is this right