To understand the Swedes’ love for the station-wagon, one has to go back to the war, the second world war. Much of the Swedish economy was built upon the fact that the country hadn’t been ravished by the war. When other countries made tanks and gunships, the Swedes developed cars for the glorious post war society they were sure would be built upon the rubble and ruins of Europe.
The Volvo PV444 was presented in 1944, with deliveries started in 1947. The Saab 92 came out to market in 1949. Those two cars and the Volkswagen were the cars of choice for the Swedish people throughout the fifties. Though they were very popular, they weren’t exactly practical cars. The Saab didn’t even have an externally available luggage compartment for the first few years. Something had to be done.
Though the Volvo was of unibody construction, there was some pressure from the commercial sector to make chassis available for conversions. In 1949 Volvo presented a separate chassis on a ladder frame, it came equipped with engine, hood, front wings, front bulkhead and dashboard. Outside coachbuilders made use of that and built various specials, like wagons, pickup trucks, fire engines and ambulances. There were even some convertibles built, much in the style of the Chrysler Town & Country woodie convertibles, though on a lower scale.
Those were not the kind of crude Epa-conversions I talked about before, but outsourced factory approved coachbuilt conversions, and therefore they were quite expensive. Market pressure then made it easier for Volvo to develop a less expensive wagon of their own, with an all steel body on the commercial chassis. The tell tale between the versions are the rudimentary rear wings often fitted to the coachbuilt cars, where the factory version is rather clean and slab sided.
The car was presented in 1953 as the Volvo PV 445, colloquially called the “Duett”, with the dual purpose of being used both “for work and pleasure”. It was marketed to artisans, craftsmen, shop-owners, and the likes, people who needed a practical wagon to make deliveries on week days, with the need to haul the family down to the beach or summer house come weekends. And as practical cars go, it was essentially the only one of its kind and therefore seen in much use.
It was also the car of choice for the various branches of the Swedish government. The bright orange cars from the national telephone company Televerket were a common sight, I remember seeing those in practical use up into the early 1980’s. Other large fleet buyers were the national railroad company SJ, who had their cars painted red with contrasting black front wings, while the national post office had their cars painted a bright yellow with contrasting black front wings.
The PV445 was modernized in parallel to its sedan counterpart; in 1960 it received a minor facelift and became the P210. At the same time, production of bare commercial chassis ended after some 4000 had been produced. In 1962, the 120-series “Amazon” station wagon was presented. It was a rather expensive solution due to the fact that it was of unibody construction.
The design staff virtually had to carve out a completely new rear end, from the B-pillars and back, with specially made rear doors, rear wings, a new roof, and a bi-split rear tail-gate. Because of that, it became more of an upscale family car, thus relegating the Duett to work horse capacity only.
And boy, did it see much of that. Not in the horse and buggy but more in the oxcart kind of style. People mistreated their cars in the most sadistic kind of way and still expected every car to do its duty. I wouldn’t be surprised if Volvos reputation for quality wasn’t built upon the sheer beatings those cars were capable of withstanding. It honed the people into the practical use of wagons and paved the way for generations upon generations of family haulers in Sweden, making the station wagon the most common car in the country.
In 1968, the Volvo 145 station wagon was presented. Interestingly enough, that year saw three overlapping generations of Volvo wagons being made, with that year being the final model year for the Amazon wagon. In 1969, the Duett was finally phased out, with a tally of roughly 90 000 cars produced.
The demise of the Duett left a hole for more practical cars in the line-up, and as a replacement of sorts the rather curious 145 Express was presented in 1970. The ten inch roof extension and larger tail-gate was made out of fiberglass, and simply just tacked on during production. With time, it has garnered a sort of cult following in Sweden.
When trying to describe the Volvo Duett, I keep looking for comparisons. But in the hearts and minds of the Swedish people there really isn’t anything like it, it transcends description. It’s like a Jeep Station Wagon but not as rugged, or like a Land Rover but without four-wheel drive. It has hippie connotations like a VW Bus, it has surfer credibility like a woodie wagon, it has anti-society vibes like a Citroen driven by a bunch of angry communists. It is unadorned like the girl next door, it is unpretentious like an Ikea dining room set, it is rugged and reliable as Sancho Panchas mule, and it is homely like a well worn Birkenstock. It is an anti-car made for those that knows that quality always wins over style, it is simply one of the most practical cars ever made.





















A very interesting piece.I’ve always liked the PV444, and still wonder if the pseudo-american styling is copied from anything in particular.
Regarding the separate chassis version , what on earth is a torpedo?
I feel the 145 wagon was let down by the wrongly shaped window glass in the rear passenger doors.
Sorry about that, it’s a swenglishicism. A torpedo is simply a front bulkhead. I didn’t check on the usage, because I was sure that the expression existed at least in UK English. I’ll change that immediately.
Etymologically speaking, I guess the expression has its roots in naval warfare. A torpedo bulkhead (on boats) is a bulkhead capable of withstanding a torpedo detonation. As the expression of bulkheads are carried over to cars, I guess the torpedo connotations followed suit, at least in swedish.
Thank you for that.
“swenglishicism.” is a wonderful new word to me ( bit like supercalafragionisticc.etc)
I should add that I don’t think I have ever seen a PV444 ( I have a picture in a car mag I bought in the late 50s) and I have never heard of the Deutt before.I am not sure I ever saw an Amazon wagon – even the saloons were rare enough in England.
Interesting that you brought forward the question of the rear doors on the 145, because I will include that particular little design trait in my next piece, the story of a designers dilemma. Look no further than after the weekend for an answer.
Those carried forward to the last 1993 245 wagons. I grew up with many 240s, 740s and have a V50 today. I am pretty sure of the rationale with those doors but don’t want to spoil your future article.
I would just about give my left testicle for one of those
What a great article to read over my huckleberry (bilberry) pancakes! I have always loved these Duett wagons, and would have owned one if it had happened to come my way. I lusted over the red and white one a friend had. They were not very common over here, but one would see them from time to time.
The Duett’s counterpart in the US would have to be the Chevy Suburban and its equivalent. They were much smaller then than today, but of course somewhat bigger than the Volvo. But their relative scale corresponds to the typical ratio of size between American and European cars back then.
I still need to do a piece on the history of Peugeot wagons, which in my mind are the ultimate station wagons, or certainly give the Duett a good run for the title. They were more sophisticated in their construction (unibody) and rear suspension.
Yeah, I was thinking of the Suburban as comparison. But I simply don’t know how common that car actually was as a family vehicle. The point of the Duett was that it was more than just being a sedan delivery, it served dual purpose as a family car as well.
Certainly not as much as in Sweden, because there were so many other more traditional wagons. And in the fifties, Americans were caught up in the ever-lower look, even in wagons. But there was a slice of the market that appreciated the Suburban’s (and other truck-based wagons) greater utility.
Paul , surely the 504 wagon ( the daddy of Peugeot wagons) had unibody construction and a live rear axle , same as the 445 ?
I am back in blighty today , and it is a bit of a culture shock – Diesel fuel costs more than Petrol !
The Duett isn’t unibody; body on frame. And it’s rear axle is the same basic leaf-spring axle as on the 444/544 sedan.
The daddy of Peugeot wagons would be the 403; the first in a long line of long-wheelbase Pug wagons that were unibody, but had their own unique rear axle/suspension. We’ll get to it..
Wikipedia says the PV444 had unibody with coil springs in the rear, while the Duett had a body on frame and leaf springs. However, they shared engines and front suspensions with each other, and upgrades following each other.
Yikes; I shot from the hip on that one. That makes Volvo a bit of a pioneer in that arrangement; not too common then.
That arrangement sounds like the mid-late 80′s relationship between my Jeep Comanche and its sister, the Jeep Cherokee.
Don’t we have some brickheads amongst our midst? Perhaps they could clearify, because I can’t remember how it really looks like. Road & Track tested the PV 444 and said this about it:
“The solid rear axle is located by a long rubber-insulated trailing arm on each side and uses coil springs.”
R&T pdf: http://www.su-filters.com/pv444l-rt.pdf
Here’s a picture of it. Coils and control arms. Like so many American (and European) cars from the sixties on.
Had a 97 406 wagon Paul beautiful car to drive ride in etc 2.1 diesel motor fast but a brittle valvetrain easlly pull 1.5tonne the last of the line started by 403, great cars for roadholding and comfort French cars are in a league of their own,
Cool article on a cool vehicle. A PV444 was the first Volvo I ever saw or rode in. When I was a little kid, we had a neighbor who was an executive at Dana axle. He would periodically drive home for a weekend with what he called “test cars”. When I saw the Volvo, I had absolutely no idea what it was – my best guess was an old VW. Wrong. I got to go for a ride. My only memory of it was that it seemed much older than what we were used to then, although in the early 60s it was probably a nearly new car.
My thing for wagons makes the Duett my new second-favorite of this series. But the one I really want is that blue convertible.
Awesome. Simply awesome.
I spotted a flat black Duett at a car show a couple weeks ago. It was sporting a 302 though.
Here it is.
Ah, flat black. The one I had didn’t have a 302, but a B20 from a 144. That was mighty fun indeed. Interestingly, the rear wings in that black car is an after market tack on. I can’t for my life understand why one would want one there, because the car looks so clean without them.
I suspect that with the 302, it has a bigger rear end, but maybe just bigger wheels and tires.
I hate it when someone takes a great, practical car and turns it into an impractical show car. Pretty much when a chevy small block is involved in any way with a classic car actually.
gotta agree. it’s usually a travesty to put a small block chevy in a european car. if the car was trashed first, well maybe but otherwise eave it alone!
I’d disagree with that. Unless the original drivetrain is in great shape, if the car is in the USA it is probably quite impractical to find parts and expertise to make it run or to improve its performance. A small-block Chevy or Ford or even better on of the GM LSx series of engines and a modern transmission is a good way to keep the “classic” car running or to improve it’s performance.
thanks, ingvar for the very enjoyable history lesson. i really love volvos, especialy the wagons. i just rebuilt the transmission on my ’02 xc70 after aamco apparently put in the wrong kind of transmission fluid. sigh… serves me right for getting such a fancy modern car. if i had a duett, i never would have had that problem!
question for y’all. what should someone who wants a practical station wagon buy today? i like the v50 but other that that, volvo seems to have lost the plot…
I have an ’06 V50. Nice car, I traded an S70 for it, it was one year old with CPO warranty. Got the 2.4i with front wheel drive as I didn’t want any turbo or AWD headaches. It’s been a pretty good car. I think new ones are turbo-only now, at least in the US.
Guys…. our family has a XC70 which we got as a low mileage lease return. Have any wisdom regarding this car? I love it… in fact the Rubbermaid motif dash is lovely IMO. Anything we should be on the lookout for?? Besides the ridiculous dealer service rate?
Perhaps all the Curbside Classic readers already know this, but Ingvar uses another European phrase in this statement:
“The tell tale between the versions are the rudimentary rear wings often fitted to the coachbuilt cars, where the factory version is rather clean and slab sided.”
For US readers, “rear wings” translates to “rear fenders”.
As a scandinavian, we are taught English in school. The thing is, it’s the Queen’s English, the English they talk in England. So, it’s very likely I will keep making mistakes, because I constantly keep mixing up the American English and UK English idioms. Like hood/bonnet, wings/fenders, and so on and so forth. English isn’t my first language, but my second, so sometimes I don’t notice the difference. I hope you’ll forgive me…
They’re not “mistakes”. And they add colour to CC. No apologies needed.
Don’t worry Ingvar, we understand, and we appreciate hearing from someone like you who has experienced these cars that we may never have seen, first hand.
That “torpedo” chassis had a very modern, safe location for the fuel tank. Impressive for a 60-year-old design.
After a brief and violent 2 month relationship with a 1962 Vauxhall Victor, I bought what I like to remember as my first car, a bright red 1965 Volvo 544.
For a student in 1969, the $900 price tag meant a contribution from my mother, for which I will always be grateful. With a B-18 engine and only 50 000 miles, it was the car of my dreams for 3 years. I can still remember the growl of that amazingly aggressive four cylinder motor, downshifting into a corner on a warm summer night, windows open. The shifter was a delight, requiring only two fingers to flip it from third back into fourth, even though the gearshift knob seemed to be placed, strangely, somewhere up around shoulder height. Mechanically it never let me down, but unfortunately the body was no match for the road salt of a Nova Scotia winter. Within a year a hole had appeared in the fender above the right rear wheel, and in another two years the trunk had virtually disappeared. RIP sweet hoodlum.
Does anyone have either a supplier of replacement Duett Chassis, or the prints for the original chassis design? Looking to build a replacement for a project.
In 1967 Volvo made their first run of 2,500 of the 140 series with four-wheel disc brakes, Limited slip differential, twin SU carburetors (102 hp) and an optional 5th gear electric overdrive. I picked an Arctic Blue sedan and drove it for 20 years, just shy of 400,000 miles. I actually miss the old dog.
http://bringatrailer.com/2012/08/23/1967-volvo-duett-210/
I had the good fortune to pilot a ’62 544 through my college years and always wanted to score one of the 210 Duett Wagons. They were very rare and I only spotted them in Southern California – San Diego & Orange Counties – where they’d been enlisted for ‘surf’ duty.