The Mercedes 450 SEL 6.9 is a pinnacle vehicle, of one sort or another. Writers gushed about it then. Writers gush about it now. Everyone holds it in revered esteem. It was the biggest, baddest, fastest sedan of its time, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound. It cost almost as much as a Rolls Royce. But in order to truly understand the 6.9, and how such a car came to be, one has to know this: it had manually adjusting front seats. If one can properly comprehend that contradiction, then one has truly understood the German folk soul that created it.
The W116 Mercedes, and the 6.9 in particular represent perhaps the peak of that that oft-used term of German arrogance. The W116 was a mighty big, wide and heavy barge to launch into the teeth of the energy crisis. Of course, it was developed just before it. But the W116′s similarity with GM’s arrogant launch of its oversized 1971 barges cannot be overlooked. Germans don’t have an exclusive on that quality.
Except of course that the two cars couldn’t be more different, with the exception of the their power plants, in general terms, anyway. The 6.9 used an enlarged version of the M-100 engine developed for that truly all-time über-Mercedes, the 600. Which of course was also used in the 6.9′s direct predecessor, the W109 300SEL 6.3 (I’m still looking).
The M-100 engine had every possible technical über-feature known to Swabians at the time: hand-built, bench tested and run for 265 minutes, 40 of them at full load; sodium-filled valves, 12 quart-dry sump oiling system, piston rings made from unobtainium, etc… Somewhat curiously, it had a cast iron block.
In Euro-trim, the 417 CID (6814 cc) V8 made 286 hp. The US version, challenged by the EPA, made 250 hp (both net). Don’t ask why I’m stuck on this comparison, but that’s the same as the Olds 455 made in 1972. In fact a Delta 88 from that (big) year weighed about the same as the 6.9. Except in a straight line (and gas consumption), any other attempts to compare the two would be futile. But the Olds did have power seats.
Brock Yates was given a 6.9 to drive from Manhattan to Road Atlanta, to there drive at full chat for 40 laps. It averaged a respectable 72 mph, and was none the worse for it. No wonder Car and Driver called it the Greatest Mercedes Ever.
Instead of power seats, MB poured its engineering efforts into its hydropneumatic suspension, a first for them. Similar to the Citroen system, it was of course more reliable, but it did include rubber suspension stops, just in case. Mercedes drivers couldn’t be caught with the dreaded Mark VIII droop.
Its rated top speed of 140 mph (225 kmh) was commonly breached, probably more readily with the spunkier Euro version (is that what Yates was given?). Ultimately, 250 hp will only push a 4200 lb brick shit house so fast. Certain laws of nature are immutable, even by German engineers.
Just like GM, Mercedes got slapped around a bit by the W116′s dimensions and thirst. It’s successor, the W126, was svelte in comparison. And there was no more big-block version. But there sure as hell were power seats.
For another fifteen years or so, Mercedes would still be at the plateau of their peak years. Around 1990 or so, is when the beginning of the long Benz slide began. Is it a coincidence that it coincides with the unification of Germany? Did Germans feel like they had accomplished a national goal, and could relax a bit?
I remember perfectly walking into the exquisite W.I. Simonson Mercedes store in Santa Monica, which had previously been a Packard dealership, and built for that purpose. It was 1977, and the first 6.9 had recently arrived.
Let’s just say I wasn’t quite as well received and indulged as I had been as a kid at Iowa City’s GM dealer. Perhaps I was too young to notice or care back then. But the silver 6.9 sitting behind the left window there was locked, and the aloof and cool salesman eyeing me gave no indication of having it be anything otherwise.
For what it’s worth, the 6.9′s interior was really no big deal if you’s spent time in any W116. The only obvious difference was that burled walnut had replaced the plebeian striped zebrano wood. That pretty much goes for everything else about the 6.9, in terms of outward appearances. For almost double the price of a very adequate 450 SEL, the 6.9′s value was a bit of a stretch.I remember vividly looking at the $40+ k sticker, and having a hard time relating to it.
That price, inflation adjusted, comes to about $150-$160k, almost exactly what Daimler asks for one of its 600 SEL sedans today. That does come with power seats. And I imagine a typical twenty-four year old would feel about the same inability to relate to its price.
The difference is whether twenty four year-olds even aspire to that kind of thing. My youngest son did, when he was sixteen or so, purely for its “gangsta” image. At nineteen, he’s well over it. An impressive ride, undoubtedly, but utterly lacking in the German folk-soul that had us drooling over the 6.3 and 6.9 in its day. The long decline of Mercedes; and it all started when they put in power seats.











Hmmm. If I’m remembering correctly, the US model version dispensed with the “450SEL” badge and had only the “6.9″ on the back. That coupled with the one-piece headlights leads me to suspect this is a grey market car.
These things were never “common”, but I remember seeing them periodically around Mill Valley in the late seventies/early eighties. Regular 450SELs were common as dirt.
Last time I saw a 6.3 was in the tow yard I worked at in 1981
gotta agree about the headlights. everything except gray market cars in ’77 had round headlights because the halogens were verboten here!
p.s. love the taillight detail. mb used to advertise that the corduroy lights were designed to be visible even after they were splashed with mud.
This is a US model where someone installed the Euro spec headlights which is a popular part for owners to swap as the Euro specs look much better. The bumpers are the give away here but there are a couple other signs. One of the few options available on the US model was the automatic climate control. While there are a couple examples of euro spec models with this I highly doubt this is one. Also the majority of Euro spec cars have Velour interior and this one.
I currently have one of these in Euro spec and I love it. The ride is smoother then old W140 Benz and the power is great. The only thing I which Mercedes did differently on it was use a 4 speed transmission instead of a 3 speed. But the torque monster of an engine has no problem doing 0-60 in just over 7 seconds if you don’t break the tires loose.
I almost owned one of these.. My former in-laws were renting a house to a recently divorced guy that was in a bit of a pickle. The price was right but the fact that it sat un-used for 15 years made me shy away.
It may have been nothing special for an MB product, but compared to what I typically drive this thing was a Rolls Royce.
If I were looking now I’d probably go for a late 80s 560.
My parents had a 450. The interior does bring back memories. Perhaps that is why I like saabs…the center mounted window switch pack.
I remember asking my Mom what was the most expensive car in the world….and being very impressed with the answer of a Rolls-Royce. Had no idea a Merc could get up there……
I’ve seen a couple of these (one looking very neglected) around Pasadena. I think the M100 cars tend to wind up in the hands of people who aren’t prepared for the time, effort and money involved in keeping them in shape, and then pass them along to the next overambitious victim, er, enthusiast. (One joke I’ve heard is that the “6.9″ or “6.3″ refers to the multiple of the purchase price you’ll spend on fixing and maintaining the car.) But when they are well-kept, they’re still handsome and imposing cars.
As for me…I think a W116 300SD might be more my speed.
The suspension is part of why a 6.9 was used to make Rendezvous. When I was a kid I remember thinking it would be a cool car to have but I was influenced by stories of Stirling Moss using a 600 Pullman to terrorize 6 passengers at a time.
Lovely car. It looks to be parked next to a well maintained early Taurus SHO, which also catches my interest.
Can you believe it, I got so wrapped up in shooting the 6.9 never noticed the SHO until I looked at the pictures at home. They’re hardly easy to find either.
There is a circa-1985 635 CSI in one of the photos too.
One of the few Mercedes I’m interested in. If that thing was any more German they would have sold it to you with the trunk filled with sauerkraut and sausage. (I say that as a proud German-American whose great-grandmother ate sauerkraut every day of her life till she died at age 92.)
I once worked for a guy in Dallas in the 1980s that one of these, a lovely gray-market car. He took great joy in demonstrating how the hydropneumatic suspension could soak up a line of 8 inch speed bumps at 50 mph. That was until he blew one of the rubber oil/air bags that cost thousands to replace. Worse, the shop that federalised it was busted by the DOT and EPA and he had to spend a ton of money to get it re-certified. Remember the gray market heydays of the 80s when the dollar was so strong? Resulted in a lot of really bad cars brought in from Germany.
I do; LA in the eighties was swamped with them, and there were little shops doing it everywhere. It was a hot little business, until it popped.
I would be very interested in reading your treatment of MB’s slow descent…
Those extended “American” bumpers really spoil the look of it.
I had a 6.3 while selling used cars in NY (silver with blue leather). I always looked for odd balls and never owned a 6.9 but had plenty of the thirsty 4.5s. It was quick but you were aware that it was a barge.. I was really frightened of the hydraulic suspension failing which never happened. I previously had a rusty 6.3 W109 which would never get off it’s belly and I had to sell that one for parts (I kept the 6.3 emblem which I still have today). The best part of owning the 6.9 was knowing how scarce they were. It’s true that only the interior wood distinguished it from the standard W116. It was and is a rare bird. A personal mercedes mechanic would come in handy if one choose to own one. The scary part would be trying to get parts for the hydraulic suspenison….good luck!
“Just like GM, Mercedes got slapped around a bit by the W116′s dimensions and thirst. It’s successor, the W126, was svelte in comparison.”
Here are the dimensions from wikipedia (FWIIW):
W116
Wheelbase 116.7 in
Length 199 in
Width 74 in
Height 56 in
Weight 4,285 lb
W126
Wheelbase 120.9 in
Length 203.1 in
Width 71.7 in
Height 56.7 in
Weight 3,682 lb
The W126 is narrower but longer, and might have been lighter.
Any chance of seeing a Pullman 600 s parked nearby, Paul?????
That’ there is my lottery car!
I always liked the 6.9 and when I had a little cash in my pocket, I found one for sale outside Portland. I made an appt with the owner and before he tossed me the keys, I asked him if there was anything I should know about the car- driveability, quirks, etc. He said nope and I went down Hwy 26. I stopped after about 10 miles and tried the lights, horn, wipers, ac, etc. It all seemed to work well aside from some dry rot in the back seats. I got back on the hwy and noticed that I did not try the sunroof. I hit the button, the sunroof went back and I heard a great whooshing sound and the sunroof was gone. I checked the rearview mirror with horror to see a semi right behind me and I expected the worst. But nothing happened. I pulled over and found that the sunroof was still attached by the opening/closing cable/tube thing and sitting on top of the roof. It became pretty apparent that there was no way I could get things back to the way they were. I drove back holding the sunroof in place and profusely apologized. I thought the owner was going to get his gun. He was pissed and made a bunch of comments about “one more thing about this car”, “the mechanic said it was fixed”, “I’ll never sell this car.” I did not buy the car.
Re: The manual seats – When I had my 1992 400E (great car!) I had to laugh the first time I wanted to adjust the mirrors – the passenger side was powered by a little joystick on the conter console, but the driver side was a manual adjustment…makes perfect sense to me as a German, but funny to experience. And the 400E was new for 1992 and significantly more expensive than the 300E (but a lot less than the 500E)…
I remember that! But thanks for reviving it.
In the BMW E9 coupes (1968-1975), standard equipment for Europe is rear windows electric and front ones crank. Makes perfect sense to me: put motors where you can’t reach the crank!
i had an mb 240d with manual windows and an electric sunroof. my mother had a volvo 240 with electric windows and a manual sunroof. neither make much sense to me!
Give me a manual sunroof in a SAAB or a Volvo any time!
Thanks to Canada’s 15 years old limit (opposed to 25 in US), a few years back I owned a similar Japanese-spec (but LHD) 1992 400E I brought from Japan with 25 000 miles on it. When new in Japan, it had a whopping sticker of $80,000 (then, not in modern $).
I always liked the fact that MB called it 450SEL 6.9 instead of 690SEL.
Oh, and Paul, shouldn’t it be “Deutsches” instead of “Deutscher” ? Heavy Metal would be a das, not a der.
Jim
Yes; my German grammar is atrocious.
Well, it would be seeing as how you are Austrian…
Jim
one of my favorite cars of all time. as a high school prank, my friends and i went hooning in one when a classmate borrowed his parents 450 sel. not sure if it was the 6.9, but boy did he fling that thing through the local mountain curves with five teenagers onboard. if he had tried that in a gm product, i wouldn’t be writing this now…
I bought a black one that had been sitting forlornly in the back of an import service lot 2 years ago. In 1979 I was bopping along Puerto Rico Highway #2 at about 95 MPH in a 1969 Mach 1 when this big, metallic brown THING whooshed by me. Try as I may, I couldn’t catch up with it, even with 3.25 gears and a 4 speed top loader. By the time I finally got a good look it was parked at the Chicken and Pizza Palace outside of my home town; that was it, from then on, I drooled over anything AMG, RUF or M class. Fast forward to the present, so far I’ve rebuilt the leveling valves and hydropump on the black bastard myself (yes, you can do it, lightning will not strike you) replaced and retorqued the head bolts, replaced the windshield and backlite gaskets and rebuilt the front calipers. I am now stripping the walnut panels and shall get them relacquered by a pro, as I refuse to make a fool of myself through overreaching self-expectation. The thing is capable of breaking traffic laws all day, it is most certainly a car after a connected European criminal’s heart. My wife calls it the Cosa Nostra car, and seems embarrassed to cruise in it; therefore, I shall further aggravate her by de-dinging and respraying the car, and adding the chrome fender-flair trim.
My dad brought home a black on black version back in the 70′s. The owner of the dealer (who was also his client) let him use the vehicle for the weekend to give him a better idea of what the car was like to own. Our current Mercedes at the time was a black 1969 280 SEL (6 cyl.). Needless to say there was an amazing difference between the two vehicles. It was a very special car with very loud in-tank fuel pumps that came alive seconds before ignition. To my young ears it sounded like a space ship. The gas consumption was staggering by any frame of reference which is probably why he didn’t purchase the car. He waited until the early 80′s and bought the 300SD.
Apparently the 6.3 engine size was decided upon because Royce engines were 6.25 litres. When RR engines were increased to 6.75 litres Benz increased to 6.9 litres! I’m told this is the case, if anyone knows otherwise please correct me! A case of, we lost the war but we’ve still got a bigger engine than you!
I’m reasonably sure these didn’t have tilt steering column either…I had 2 W116s, a 280SE and a gray market 450SE in a horrible Granny Smith green with saffron velour, and as far as I recall both had fixed steering columns.
I too would be very interested in reading your analysis of MB’s decline…..your articles are great. Please keep it up!