
1968 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / Bring a Trailer
The 1966–1969 Jeep Super Wagoneer and 1968–1971 Wagoneer Custom Special were the earliest regular-production examples of a now-common breed: posh upscale SUVs aimed squarely at monied buyers, with lofty price tags to match. However, neither the Super Wagoneer and Custom Special was a commercial success, and both were short-lived.

1968 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / Bring a Trailer
The original SJ Wagoneer, launched for the 1963 model year, was a landmark design: a relatively compact truck-based tall station wagon combining truck-like capability and car-like comfort. In a 1965 technical paper, Kaiser Jeep experimental engineer Paul B. Hartman described it as ” an economical, rugged, reliable, all-around, passenger-cargo-utility vehicle for pleasure, fun, and work.” In the ’60s, it was a niche product, still often sold as a working vehicle — there was even a panel delivery version early on — but for just under $200 extra, there was also a plusher Custom Wagoneer, offering what the brochure called “class enough for any dress-up affair.”

Jeep Super Wagoneer prototype at the 1966 Detroit Auto Show, November–December 1965 / The Henry Ford
The great lesson of the postwar automotive scene was that if there’s a market for deluxe, there’s usually also a market for super deluxe, and so Kaiser Jeep soon came up with the idea of an even plusher Wagoneer aimed at the Town & Country set. This emerged for the 1966 model year as the Super Wagoneer, which made the auto show circuit in the fall of 1965. Kaiser didn’t get around to issuing a press release announcing the production version until the following March, although it was apparently on sale by December 1965.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) with non-stock wheels / 1HD1
Identified by the model number 1414D, the Super Wagoneer was a four-door Wagoneer 4WD with unique exterior and interior trim. Outside, it had anodized side and tailgate trim, a vinyl roof covering (although a few were apparently special-ordered without it), a roof rack, and special mag-style wheel covers.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) with non-stock wheels / 1HD1

The Super Wagoneer came with mag-style wheel covers with simulated knockoff spinners / Canyon State Classics
Inside, the Super Wagoneer had classy vinyl upholstery, full carpeting, bucket seats, a center console with console shifter, wood trim on the doors and console, chrome ribs on the headliner, and a power rear window (though power side window lifts weren’t available).

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / 1HD1

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / 1HD1

1968 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / Bring a Trailer
The Super Wagoneer was offered only with a 270 hp (gross) four-barrel version of the new Vigilante V-8 (the AMC 327), Turbo Hydra-Matic, Saginaw power steering, and power brakes; a limited-slip differential was optional. I don’t think the 1414D was available in a 2WD version, so the Wagoneer’s short-lived independent front suspension option wasn’t available.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / 1HD1
Unusually for this era, air conditioning and tinted windows were standard equipment on the Super Wagoneer, as were an AM radio and a tilt-and-telescope steering wheel. I think the small console-mounted clock was a dealer-installed accessory.

1968 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / Bring a Trailer

1968 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / Bring a Trailer
All of this made the Super Wagoneer a genuinely fancy truck, but it also brought the base price in 1966 to $5,978, which was firmly in the luxury car class — that was Cadillac de Ville territory. However, a Super Wagoneer was a vehicle of unique capabilities. It was civilized enough for placid highway cruising in air-conditioned comfort, but with its 4WD and two-speed transfer case, it could venture confidently into places a Cadillac or Lincoln would have to be air-lifted into or out of.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / 1HD1
With its upright, boxy shape, the Wagoneer was also roomy and versatile, with up to 91 cu. ft. of cargo space.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) / 1HD1
Although it leaned a lot in turns, the Wagoneer handled surprisingly well by contemporary domestic standards, and its compact-car-size footprint made it easy to maneuver. The 270 hp V-8 and automatic gave the Super Wagoneer adequate power — 0 to 60 mph in 12.8 seconds and the quarter mile in 18.7 seconds, according to Motor Trend — and on-road fuel economy in 2WD mode was 12 to 15 mpg, reasonable enough for a 4,500 lb tall wagon with a carbureted 5.4-liter V-8.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) with non-stock wheels / 1HD1
(In mid-1968, the Vigilante 327 was phased out in favor of the new Dauntless 350, a small-block Buick engine with 230 hp.)

Buick Dauntless 350 V-8 in a 1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
Twenty or thirty years later, such a mix of attributes would be a license to print money, but in its day, the Super Wagoneer was a rare sight, and it barely survived three and a half years. Kaiser Jeep didn’t compile model-specific production figures in this period, only calendar-year aggregates, but the most commonly quoted estimate for Super Wagoneer production is just 1,485 units: 657 in 1966, 455 in 1967, and 373 in 1968–1969. The Super Wagoneer was dropped early in the 1969 model year.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) with non-stock wheels / 1HD1
Kaiser Jeep didn’t immediately give up, introducing the conceptually similar Wagoneer Custom Special during 1968. The Super Wagoneer and Custom Special were available concurrently for a little while, but the Custom Special was essentially a Super Wagoneer successor.

1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
Identified with the chassis code 1414X, the Custom Special kept most of the Super Wagoneer interior trim, but deleted the exterior dress-up and moved some of the Super’s standard features — in particular air conditioning — to the options list.

1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
This brought the list price down to $5,671, $492 cheaper than the 1968 Super Wagoneer, although ordering air conditioning (which this blue Custom Special has) erased most of the difference.

1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
I haven’t been able to find any estimates for Wagoneer Custom Special production, but it doesn’t appear it did any better than the Super Wagoneer, since it didn’t survive any longer: It was offered only through 1971, with 1971 models (built after the acquisition of Jeep by AMC) substituting the AMC 360 V-8 for the Buick Dauntless engine.

1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
In later years, Jeep would again push the Wagoneer upmarket, adding the Wagoneer Limited in 1978 and the Grand Wagoneer for 1984. Lavishly equipped and extravagantly priced, it remained a reliable moneymaker through 1991. However, the Super Wagoneer and Wagoneer Custom Special were commercial flops.
Given how popular this type of vehicle has since become, why didn’t they sell better?
- They were really pricey. A Super Wagoneer cost almost $2,000 more than a Custom Wagoneer, which was already a $4,000 vehicle. The Custom Special was cheaper, but not much, especially if you wanted air conditioning (which was extra on the 1414X). For rich buyers looking for a posh shuttle for the family compound or country estate, it was only money, but I imagine the price tag provoked some sticker shock for middle-class buyers — a Super Wagoneer was not a small step up from the Custom Wagoneer.
- They didn’t hold their value well. Especially with the V-8 engine, the Wagoneer had decent residuals for a truck, but based on Kelley Blue Book values, a Super Wagoneer or Custom Special would shed well over half its value in the first year. The trade-in value of a year-old Custom Special was only about $50 more than that of the much cheaper V-8 Custom Wagoneer, with the air-conditioned Super Wagoneer commanding just $200 more than that. Not an issue for the upper crust, perhaps, but for more financially conscious buyers, a Coupe de Ville was a much better buy in financial terms.
- Kaiser Jeep didn’t have a big retail foothold. The Kaisers had always been more comfortable with government contracts than with the volatility of the retail market, and many of Jeep’s efforts to expand their market in this period had fallen short — until the AMC acquisition in 1970, Jeep just didn’t have the dealer body. I don’t know how many of its ’60s dealers were up to selling $6,000 luxury vehicles either; Jeep in those days still did a lot of business in very utilitarian fleet vehicles, many of them less than half the price of a Super Wagoneer. AMC (and later Chrysler) had the sales and marketing resources to make consumer-oriented Jeep models mainstream hits, but Kaiser really didn’t.

1966 Jeep Super Wagoneer (1414D) with non-stock wheels / 1HD1
- They were awfully small. Viewed from an era in which massive front and rear overhang are no longer the primary signifiers of automotive opulence, the SJ’s proportions and dimensions seem perfectly normal, but in the late ’60s, the Wagoneer was the size of a compact car — 183.7 inches long on a 110-inch wheelbase, over 3 feet shorter than a contemporary Cadillac. If you weren’t old money or a movie star and were worried what the neighbors would think, the Super Wagoneer might seem too dinky for a luxury vehicle.
- If you just wanted a station wagon, there were plenty of other choices. In later years, the minivan and SUV hunted the traditional station wagon to extinction, but the 1960s were still a boom time for wagons. If you wanted passenger and cargo room and weren’t concerned about off-roading, a Ford Country Squire or Oldsmobile Vista Cruiser was a more orthodox choice, and still posh enough for affluent buyers.
- Their styling was an acquired taste. As with a lot of Brooks Stevens efforts, the Wagoneer looked like the product of an industrial designer or architect rather than an automotive stylist — a kind of Mid-Century Modern corrugated shoe box, more Richard Neutra than Bill Mitchell. Being detached from contemporary automotive styling trends made the SJ Wagoneer a durable design, undoubtedly contributing to its long and profitable production life, but a Super Wagoneer or Wagoneer Custom Special was aesthetically out of step with similarly priced contemporary luxury cars, vinyl top or no.

1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
- They were still trucks. The eventual commercial triumph of the SUV was thanks in large part to the Baby Boom generation, many of whom had embraced pickup trucks and smaller SUVs in the ’70s and had fewer prejudices towards them than their parents’ generation had. For a typical affluent 40-something or 50-something buyer of the late 1960s, trucks and vans were for tradesmen, poor people, and greasy kids, not respectable middle-class suburban status seekers.
- They were maybe too nice for trucks. Here was the conundrum that still haunts the fancy truck market: A luxurious truck may be a highly capable vehicle, but the fancier it is, the less likely it is to ever be used for any of the rough or muddy work for which it was theoretically designed. If you were a well-heeled outdoorsy type who intended to make regular expeditions into the muck and mud, the fancy carpeting of the 1414D and 1414X might have been a deterrent, and for a hunting, fishing, or camping trip, the bench seats of the standard model or Custom Wagoneer probably made more sense than the pricier models’ buckets and console.

1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
All this is a reminder that cars and trucks don’t exist in a vacuum. The Super Wagoneer and Custom Special had most of the ingredients that later made SUVs a commercial bonanza, but in the late ’60s, the automotive ecosystem that made luxury SUVs so successful didn’t yet exist, so they were only a minuscule chunk of a small niche. Depending on how different social, economic, and regulatory trends shape up, they might one day be that again.

1968 Jeep Wagoneer Custom Special (1414X) / Bring a Trailer
Related Reading
Curbside Classic: 1968 Jeep Wagoneer – The Most Influential Vehicle Of The Post War Era – Not Just A Passing Fad (by Paul N)
Vintage Review: 1963 Jeep Wagoneer – Jeep’s I.F.S. Road To Nowhere (by Jon Stephenson)
Design Capsule: 1959 Willys Malibu and 1961 J-100 – The First Two Tries at Styling the 1963 Jeep Wagoneer (by Paul N)
Curbside Classics: Jeep Cherokee And Wagoneer SJ – Brief Initiation Into Jeep’s 4×4 Might (by Rich Baron)
Vintage R&T Review: 1978 Jeep Wagoneer Limited – “Can You Imagine An American Manufacturer Building the Same Body For 15 Years?” How About 29 Years! (by Paul N)
Curbside Classic: 1979 Jeep Wagoneer Limited – Unlimited Appeal (by Tatra87)
Curbside Capsule: 1984-91 Jeep XJ Wagoneer Limited – Social Climber (by William Stopford)
I remember one single Wagoneer from my childhood – some neighbors who kept to themselves owned one, probably around 1970. It was an older couple, and their other car was a Mercedes sedan. I know it was not a Super Wagoneer, it was plain white outside. It might have been a Custom Special, but given the production numbers, I doubt it.
These folks were considered oddballs by we kids on the street. They were not outdoors people, but seemed to use it just like people would use a GW by the early 80s. So yes, this was a definite niche vehicle for people who didn’t really care what others thought.
I like these a lot – this is the first I can ever recall seeing one outside of a period advertisement. Although, truth be told, I prefer the extra size of a Travelall.
’68-’70 models should command highest contemporary market prices, simply because B (big block).O.P. engines should be easy drop-ins. Of course, Chevrolet also, only with transmissions cast with matching bolt patterns.
Despite not having been designed in an art studio, I’ve always found them appealing, since childhood. They could’ve done better with an attractive dashboard, though. That would have made a world of difference, for those more demanding types who were ready to fork out more dough for an oddball vehicle of this type
I guess that, in addition to all the elements cited above, the Wagoneers were just too early on the scene. I’m reminded of the 1959 Austin A40, which combined sharp Pininfarina styling with a (split tailgate) hatchback and folding rear bench. In other words, it was a prototype VW Golf, 15 years before the Golf debuted. But customers didn’t know they wanted a hatchback; RWD will have compromised space utilisation, and BMC never really got behind the model, focusing their efforts on the FWD Mini (also 1959) and ADO16 (1962) – neither of which was ever hatchbacked, though both bodies would’ve been ideal for the type.
Owned a couple of those A40 farinas the split tailgate was an option the 59 i had only the bottom gate opened the 64 had a proper wagon split tailgate, BMC was hampered by Issigonis and his mania for gearboxes in engine sumps and Citroen done cheap leaky suspensions.
Great write-up – it’s amazing to think about how close this was to the magic ingredients of 20 or 30 years later. I’ve really got to wonder if these vehicles were the result of Jeep guessing that the market was heading in this direction, or whether it was a shot in the dark? I could see it being either.
I can see Wagoneers like this appealing to wealthy families who were looking to take a “trip of a lifetime” driving cross-country towing a trailer and maybe exploring some unpaved roads. But beyond that, like you noted, the market just wasn’t there… yet.
I did not know the Wagoneer was that short. It’s about the length of a Subaru Forester. My daughter’s 2023 Forester has a wheelbase of 105.1 inches and an overall length of 182.7 inches. My 2017 Subaru Outback has a wheelbase of 108.1 inches and an overall length of 189.6 inches. The 2025 Outback is a little longer at 191.9 inches with the same wheelbase.
To put it in perspective, in late 1974, my parents purchased a new Hornet Sportabout from Bill Whitten AMC in Birmingham. It was a compact car-mom wanted a car that had good gas mileage-and the specs listed in the brochure have the wheelbase for Hornet at 108 inches and the overall length at 187 inches and yet today, both the Wagoneer and the Hornet would be competitive size wise.
Just ahead of its time. The original Range Rover was hardly plush inside either. Back then affluent folks were still ok with non-plush utility vehicles.
It’s easy to say in retrospect, but more extensive “wood” might have captured some of the residual attraction that woodie wagons and Chrysler’s T&C had back in the ’20s-40s.
I am not an SUV fan but if someone put a gun to my head and said I needed to own one I would pick this by a mile. I love the interior quite a bit. When I saw the rear cargo shot this thought immediately ran through my mind. I am going to lay down some 4x8s and bags of concrete mix? No, I am not doing that. So there goes that particular use of the vehicle.
Now at the time this came out there were Country Squires all over the place where I lived in Southern California. They were driven by Moms hauling their kids and groceries. Now was a Mom going to drive this? You would think so since that Mom probably learned to drive a car in the 50s with basic brakes and steering. So this should be easy with power but the styling was too close to a truck. Failing that would this be better as a Father vehicle hauling kids around? Can’t say I saw fathers hauling kids around, seven days a week, back then for WWII men.
Given that we know large SUV’s are a significant contributor to climate change, it would not have done any of us any good, for the large SUV popularity trend to have started thirty-years earlier.
Genuine simulated mag wheels broham effect on steroids or just how chintzy can we make it, might make the punter wonder what else they cheaped out on if youre going to charge Cadillac prices use luxury parts.
All good reasons why the Super Wagoneer/Custom Special were flops, but I’d say the big ones were simply Kaiser’s miniscule size relative to the Big 3. Kaiser had neither the dealer network, nor the big marketing machine to push their wares.
But another, more prosaic reason is there wasn’t the minivan ‘soccer mom’ backlash that pushed legions into plush SUVs. The minivan’s stunning success was due in no small part to its practicality, but years later, that would be seen as a negative. Suddenly, consumers no longer wanted to be seen in a dowdy minivan, but still wanted the room and a ‘sporty’, outdoor’s lifestyle ethos, something the Big 3 were more than happy to exploit.
None of that existed back in the Super Wagoneer’s day.