Let me take you through a potted part-history of the BMW frontal treatment and via an appreciation of the very handsome Vision Neue Klasse sedan shape before answering this existential question.
BMW’s entry for the 1940 Mille Miglia comprised an impressive array. The roadster styled by Peter Symanowski was the earliest of the three and set the streamlining tone. At the right is Carrozzeria Touring’s coupe body commissioned by BMW which actually won the race, and at left is the Kamm coupe styled by Wilhelm Meyerhuber which was in fact the most aerodynamic of the three but failed to finish.
Each bore a similar frontal treatment; the twin grille devised in 1933 by stylist Friz Fiedler for the 303 model, at some point nicknamed ‘kidneys’ and by this time synonymous with the marque.
Which is not to say the kidneys were a lock. The scale model of the 337 up top is from the same year as the Mille Miglia victory, and shows BMW considering an arrangement more akin the groundbreaking 1938 Lincoln Zephyr with a broad and shallow one-piece grille rather than the tall and narrow two-piece.
For 1951 Symanowski styled BMW’s first post-war effort, the 501 saloon that became known as the Baroque Angel. Bottom left is the initial body mockup built by Reutter, and to its right an early production prototype. After toying with some frontal complexification, it was decided the kidneys on their own was the way to move forward.
For their next model BMW commissioned Count Albrecht von Goertz, resulting in the 1956 503 coupe – a much under-rated effort. Bottom left is the Michelotti-penned revision for a private client of coachbuilder Ghia-Aigle. It is essentially the same body with Italianate face. Such is the accomplishment of von Goertz’ shape, the Michelotti variation comes across more like a very handsome Lancia or Maserati.
But the unique nose of the factory 503 added an extra touch of exoticism; exquisitely rounded voluming fronted by the tall and narrow kidney grilles. This nose’s utter aptness is demonstrated by another vehicle, the 1957 Frazer Nash Continental Fixed Head Coupe bottom right. Built by BMW’s UK distributors, it featured the BMW V8 ahead of a Porsche 356 cabin. Frazer Nash asked Friz Fiedler to fill in the rest of the body which he did exceedingly well. The longer front starts at a superb nose modelled directly from the von Goertz progenitor albeit with combined grille.
When Max Hoffman came looking for a sporting roadster to sell in the US, he did not appear enamoured of the 503. That was not enough to dissuade him of von Goertz’ talent, and the Count was tasked with this brief as well.
He may have envisioned the lower, more sporting body with the 503 nose as well, and top left shows an interpretation with narrow kidneys though not as rounded. Other alternatives included the example with broader kidneys drawn directly from the Fiat 1100 TV roadster, top right.
The rendering at bottom is close to production; a full-width and shallow twinset. It disavowed the marque identity – next to non-existent in the US – in favour of something that perfectly complemented this perfect body.
Giovanni Michelotti, too, had aspirations of a broad and shallow twinset for BMW. Top left is a BMW proposal, likely proactive, he penned for Bertone in the early 1950s. To its right is a sketch done directly for BMW later that decade, a re-bodying of the large 501 saloon with a very American flavour.
The middle image shows one of his many variations for the smaller Neue Klasse saloon of the early 1960s, and at bottom a 1967 updating of the 02 coupe with grille treatment that ended up on a Triumph instead.
Such was the 507 roadster’s beauty, there was for a moment serious consideration given to the broad and shallow. Bottom right is one of privateer Willi Martini’s mid-engined BMW-powered racers with 507 frontal treatment which he hoped might enter factory production.
Up top, and despite its number plate, is a styling proposal for the Neue Klasse of the same grille school. With these three we are transported to an alternative universe where this becomes the marque face across all models.
But no.
Until a few years ago, that is. Where the 2023 Vision Neue Klasse varied from previous broad and shallow grille efforts was in the more sculptural approach to the nose and its cavities.
There will, of course, be those CC readers whose minds turn immediately to the 1961 Pontiac and 1966 Mustangs designed at Barris Kustom for Sonny and Cher as the inspiration for this nose. But no.
Though it doesn’t seem immediately obvious, I contend that the California Residence by Zaha Hadid was the primary influence on the neue Neue Klasse nose. To be clear, I am not talking about copying. These architectural renders are the inspiration, the starting point from which the BMW designers modified and massaged the form to advance the notion very effectively in an automotive context.
Her influence is something I covered ten years ago at CC for a piece on the Vision EfficientDynamics concepts car, and have just expanded upon at Driven To Write.
The primary influence on the rest of the Vision Neue Klasse was the Bertone Garmisch.
Conceived by Marcello Gandini, Garmisch was built amidst the infighting over BMW styling at the turn of the 1970s. It very nearly became the first 3 Series, with the actual prototype being paid for by Bertone in an effort to swing the conflict in their direction. The carrozzeria won the battle but – thanks to Bob Lutz – lost the war, and the prototype subsequently disappeared.
By the time BMW styling head Adrian van Hooydonk (left) discovered the car in archival photos, Bertone had fallen bankrupt. BMW needed to negotiate with the Italian Government, now in possession of the Garmisch drawings and their attendant intellectual property rights. That out of the way, another bodybuilder was found and the re-creation unveiled to the press in 2019 with Gandini (right) as honoured guest.
Garmisch’s most obvious mark on the BMW roadcar was a return to the deep and (relatively) narrow kidney grille seen on the 2021 M3 and M4, albeit not as stridently angular.
These being performance variants, they’ve earned a bespoke grille arrangement. Other models have been denied the depth, but the straightened edges of the Garmisch kidneys are applied across the board and for the most part the kidneys are broadened as per the above XM SUV. With that lumpen body and Label Red trim, this example is redolent of the term lipstick on a pig.
The Vision Neue Klasse, on the other hand, is the best-looking vehicle to emerge from BMW since the 2009 Vision EfficientDynamics. It bears little directly from its namesake, though it does share a lightness of form that made the 1961 model such a break from the larger 501/2 saloons.
As per the Hadid inspiration for the grille, Garmisch has informed its cleaner surfacing, crisp edging and tighter voluming, but the Bertone concept car is a starting point for the body and not the basis for a hommage. Notably, the Garmisch kidneys are absent.
It was launched as part of a family, though the top image appears to be an illustration only. The strippo model has its own charms, but the minivan is sorely lacking.
So is the SUV shown a little later. Those indecisive haunches over the wheels do everything to ruin the mastery of the sedan’s body language.
Every frigging SUV on the road is a clone of the other and here is the ideal opportunity to differentiate. I’d love to see a car-faced approach, rather like the Sbarro Windhound at top rendered with the precision of the Fiat 131 Abarth.
Speaking of wishes, this is a sedan begging for a Sportabout-type wagon treatment – or as the BMWians call it, a Touring.
As with the front and rear, the profile of the Vision Neue Klasse is faultless. But it does beg the question; who is this car for? The sedan is on the verge of extinction, being replaced by mullet four-door fastbacks (business up front, party at the rear) and I would be very disappointed to see that applied here.
Vision Neue Klasse does not map directly onto the current 3-Series, having a more cabin-forward shape. It may be that this language will be applied over the roadcar’s architecture, but that seems generations away and the Vision Neue Klasse could be in-market now. Should be. Just look at Hyundai’s Ioniq.
When Vision Neue Klasse was launched, I was under the impression it was to be a sub-marque – not quite MINI, but something running parallel to the current BMW range. The SUV is about to hit the market as the iX3, so maybe not.
If it does reach production I hope they keep the sedan as pure as the concept, and I pray they don’t add those neon kidneys up front.
Further Reading
1964 1800 Neue Klasse – The Car that Saved and Made BMW
by Paul N
Deadly Sins: BMW’s Brush With Death – The V8
by T87
How E12 Spelled the End for Bertone and Michelotti at BMW
by Don A
Concept Classic: 2009 BMW Vision EfficientDynamics
by Don A
Zaha’s Dynamic Ribbon
at Driven to Write
Yikes.
Seems to me that “car design” has gone off the rails.
I think they just don’t know what to do anymore. Razor angles and random creases seem to be a thing, in which some features look “cool” or at least interesting, but doesn’t seem to make for a cohesive design as a whole car. Let’s not even start discussing modern wheel arches.
Most cars today look so similar, but similarly ugly.
Honestly though, where can they go from here?
The dude doth protest too much, methinks.
To my eyes, the front grille treatment already IS the kidney grille and perfect. That SUV at the end kind of ruins the whole thing with the extra kidneys and I suppose reflects what BMW is trying to do, i.e. make it super obvious to everyone that it’s a BMW, i.e. pretty much their direction for the last almost two decades now. Just let the design speak for itself instead of going the $299/month route and class the joint up a notch.
Interestingly I was under the impression that the huge nostrils that sort of took over in the last 6 or 7 years were there as that’s what certain markets such as China preferred, however now that China has its own quality vehicular offerings and is backing down from buying everything German (how was that nor predictable?) it seems BMW may be moving away from that again, a good thing as far as I’m concerned if it results in them chasing more dollars, pounds, yen, and euros rather than yuan with less in your face designs, although the lit up stuff and especially the red one is just jarring again, not in a good way..
As far as the Neue Klasse concept sedan is concerned, I find it’s a marvelous design overall (although the tail lights unfortunately remind me a little too much of the 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (I like the shape, not the association, but don’t change it). The car for me continues the vein of design I for some reason enjoy a lot in the Polestar 2 (which is a hatchback though not obvious about it), the Ioniq 5 (which as far as I’m concerned is the boldest piece of design and detailing work released in the last decade plus), also a hatch although some see it as an SUV (I just see Lancia Delta Integrale goodness), and now this, the most interesting sedan shape BY FAR of the last I don’t know how long. In Touring form it could even be better but it’s great as is too.
Just leave that grille as is, it says everything it needs to while speaking in a confident and measured tone rather than babbling on all brash, shouty, and manic.
Agree on the kidneys already being in place, and perfect: also that it’s the most interesting sedan shape in years: and the bold Delta-sweetness of the Ionic.
Hongqi is still chasing the BMW look, but they haven’t made their way here yet. For the most part, the Chinese cars that jump to mind are either a clone of the Tesla sedan (BYD) or Mazda SUV (MG). Hyundai seems to be the most adventurous with regards design, but they don’t seem to have made their models look like they’re all from the same marque.
I was under the impression that the Vision Neue Klasse was going to be the real thing, or very close to it. But clearly BMW is chickening out, as the actual iX3 looks a lot more Alte Klasse than Neue Klasse. I should have known better.
Yes, having it be a sedan should have raised questions from the start, as it is very much a dying body style. And I noticed the similarity of its tail to that of the Lincoln Zephyr like Jim did. It’s not its best end, by far.
So what was the point exactly? To honor BMW’s design history? To raise our hopes, falsely? Frankly, I’m a bit tired of “vision” and “concept” cars that turn out to be more in the realm of cock-teasing than truly predictive. Maybe it was the GM Volt concept that finally jaded me on concepts.
Thanks for taking us along on this tour; your guidance is always superb. And I do recommend that readers click on the link to your superb new piece “Zaha’s Dynamic Ribbon” at DTW. It is superb.
https://driventowrite.com/2025/09/12/zahas-dynamic-ribbon/
The Vision Neue Klasse concept will become the production i3, and the concept and production cars are certain to be as identical visually as the iX3 was to the Vision Neue Klasse X concept.
That’s good to know. That was my earlier impression had been. Looking forward to just how little (or not) it will be changed from the concept. The production iX3 has lost a bit in the production realization.
The Vision Neue Klasse front end has a bit of a KIA vibe to it. Doesn’t bother me.
Would look so much better if they returned to Round Headlamps…
They’d work well, softening the angularity a tad.
Glad to see ANY comments towards the Triumph Dolomite Sprint. The car that coulda / shoulda taken on BMW if it were only built better.
I saw a Triumph Dolomite recently not a sprint, just the regular version that was a fast car anyway, they handle well, you can chuck them around on a twisty road just fine.
PS: I would prefer one with an inline six, though.
Neue klasse is all about EVs so guess thats why they go a bit nuts on the design, maybe attracting other customers than the usual BMW buyer.
They will probably stay more conservative with their ICE cars although alot can be said about their latest designs.
The ICE cars are being updated to look more like the Neue Klasse cars. BMW tries to keep its EVs and ICE cars looking the same, even if many of its EVs will soon be on a different platform entirely.
Peak BMW styling was a really long time ago, Grilles now are ridiculous, as are some logos, my daily has almost nothing in badging to distinguish ii from others if youve seen one, BMW just needs the kidneys like they used to size on the back.
uhh…………MEH. 🙁 OTOH, the AMC Sportabout looks pretty good by comparison!! DFO
I saw a very nice BMW the other day. Oh wait. No. It was a very nice Buick.
Congratulations Don on finding such a nice shot of the stillborn Frazier Nash Continental. The grill is of course the traditional 50s Frazer Nash grill.
I have to say I never liked the Garmisch, or the Garmisch kidneys.
I’ve always admired the FNC shape, but it’s actually Paul who alerted me to the 356 connection. I forgot to link this above
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/snapshot-from-1960-quick-what-car-is-it/
As ever, Don has covered this issue well here – thank you.
I’m a bit intrigued about the relationship between the saloon and the SUV – one has a central tall kidney grille, one doesn’t, only one has the huge (unnecessary?) under grille vents and slots, the window shapes/DLO are different, the side surfacing is different, the wheel arches are different, even the bonnet shut line is in a different place.
Some of that may be a consequence of the additional height , based around the presence and stance of the SUV. but some look like a choice. The result is that the saloon seems like an attractive clean break from 30-40 years of BMW styling and the SUV looks a big refresh of some very repetitive styling.
And then I saw the completed version on line, and I’m underwhelmed, as it looks like a heavily refreshed take on the current X3 and X5. There is a new grille format and a dramatic interior, which perhaps the most over the top steering wheel you could imagine.
Or maybe I’m missing something?
Nice stuff, and as informative and thoughtful as ever, from The Don Himself.
Not at all sure about the Zaha Hadid ribbon influence – or, perhaps, the coincidental confluence in massive graphical power in computers for design and materials tech? – as being a good thing. The superhero kid’s toy folds and clefts of the modern face and underbite, the same on the bum, headlights scrunched as if a movement is in motion, I will be glad when all these ribbons fly off one day.
Perhaps this elegant, elegant Neue Klasse will indeed start a new class, of class. Do hope so, lest we end up in an era where the entire BMW in the showroom is just a pair of giant, gaudily-bejeweled kidneys on wheels.
Redesign the lower section of the rear side window a bit, where the window and the C-pillar meet. And it will be a solid, desirable design. I also see potential for a shooting break.
By the way: The nose can stay as it is.
Much better than what is coming out of Munich today which is soooo ugly!!
In a round about way, I see it as the next edition of the Mercury Milan.
Count me among those who doubt the theory of the Hadid architectural influence.
The grille treatment seems to me to be more of an evolution of the grille intended for the never launched Z2 Roadster (see image below).