I’ve yet to miss a connecting flight or appointment at my destination, but this was cutting it close. Thunderstorm cells rolling over Denver were wreaking havoc on air traffic, and when widebodies with 350 people apiece are running very late to Honolulu and Europe, your little beer can CRJ-700 to Little Rock is not the priority. First a one-hour delay. Then another. And hey, why not, have a third. My final destination was an hour outside Little Rock and that car rental counter closes at midnight. The plane touched down at 11:30 and trundled towards the terminal where the jet bridge took its sweet time deploying. C’mon, c’mon….
I’m not sure if the Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport is a direct insult to Washington’s biggest power couple or just a charming homage. What I do know is that it’s tiny and our plane was the only source of activity, so I had the distinct impression I should bypass the not-yet-turning luggage carousel and head straight for that rental counter. I was relieved to see it still staffed.
Two people had reached the counter before me, a woman already signing paperwork and a man being read his options: Corolla or Sentra. There’s a quandary for you. What will he do? Corolla. Looks like I’d be getting the Sentra, then. Being on the company dime, I’d ordered from the same cheap part of the menu.
“Sir, I’m afraid there isn’t much left this time of night”, the clerk said to me. “There’s a Sentra or a Mustang.”
I blinked stupidly for a second. I wasn’t expecting that.
“Uh, Mustang”, I said.
“I coulda gotten that one but I told him I didn’t want nuthin’ sporty!” piped up the lady signing her paperwork.
I blinked again. “That’s OK, I’ll sacrifice for you this time” I replied as I took the car key and headed back to the luggage carousel to find it spinning with only my suitcase now on it. Perfect timing. As with math equations, there was a correct order of operations to follow.
It wasn’t hard to find the Mustang adjacent to the three remaining Sentras in the parking garage. I then saw the ragtop. Rental roulette really paid out tonight.
I orient myself in this very unfamiliar car and manage to start the engine and lower the roof. As it quietly burbles and murmurs at idle, I watch a few tired-looking professional types emerge from the rental office. Comrades from my plane! But they were foolish, the poor bastards. They waited at the carousel for their luggage and now they have Sentra keys. Order of operations, people.
I sweep out of the garage and toward the interstate as the humid and fragrant Southern air envelopes the open cabin. At the empty onramp I roll into the throttle and confirm suspicions that it’s not a GT—I know the surge and fart of a heavily turbocharged four cylinder well enough by now. But it cooks. The back end squirms a bit and eighty-five arrives pronto. EcoBoost! I’m exhausted but the onrush of night air is invigorating and intoxicating. I start coming back to life. Travel stress? What travel stress? It’s just you and the wind and the dark and the empty blacktop, pardner. Will this steed do more than 85? I cackle like a madman and disappear. All concerns proximal and distant melt away, left far behind on the deserted interstate of a moonless night.
Few rental cars will get the chance to make such a sterling first impression, but over the next week of normal use, the Mustang didn’t lose all that much luster. In fact, it did a passable job of approximating the S5 Cabriolet experience for $25,000 less. The chassis is capable, the ride is comfortable, the structure feels solid, the interior is nicer than expected, and it is fast enough to back up its looks.
This is a midrange Mustang, an EcoBoost Premium with the 200A equipment package that provides heated and cooled power seats with decent vinyl, a heated steering wheel, an OK stereo, and a full sweep screen with Android Auto and a bunch of settings and customizations that I had no patience for. Forty-six grand, if you’re interested. Forty-one for the hardtop with the same equipment.
Would you believe this was my first time behind the wheel of a pony car? I’m accustomed to more upright seating positions, so the low hip point and high beltline made me feel like the Little Old Lady from Pasadena, even though I’m nearly six feet tall. The hood looms up in the field of vision and seems to extend 50 feet ahead. The interior materials and build quality were better than I expected. Everything above glovebox and armrest level is nicely padded and felt solid. Everything below that is pure crap, but you don’t interact with it much. The 201A equipment group improves some of that.
Free of any muscle car nostalgia and opinions on what the cockpit should look like, I found the controversial big screen a fairly pleasant implementation of the technology. The gauges are legible and configurable, the graphics are crisp, the brightness levels are very mellow and nonintrusive at night, and it is integrated into the dashboard about as well as can be expected. The climate and audio interfaces are nested in the touchscreen and are very irritating to use.
This rental did not have the performance package with the adjustable dampers, upgraded brakes, and shorter 3.55:1 drive ratio for even quicker acceleration. I’m not sure it needs any of that.
Front end response is quicker than I expected for a car this big, and it changes direction nimbly with little roll. The Mustang is a good back road car despite its mass and width. It isn’t as sharp as my Fiesta ST, but its path accuracy and steering response make it easy to place at reasonable speeds, and good body control keeps it from bobbing about too much mid-turn. The fixed suspension tune of this trim starts to feel stiff on really rotten pavement, but otherwise offers a good balance of comfort and control. Brakes are strong and linear. Tire noise is low. The fabric top permits wind noise at highway speeds, but I imagine the hardtop is a quiet interstate cruiser.
Laugh at a four-cylinder Mustang if you will, but the 2.3-liter EcoBoost is powerful. If you just mildly brake-torque it at a stoplight, it’s scalded-pig time all the way to freeway speeds. Turbo lag is minimal. The engine churns through the midrange and lands fully in boost in the next gear after a crisp upshift. The 350 lb-ft of torque is a big number and you can feel it. MotorTrend clocked it at 4.9 seconds 0 to 60, and that’s without the 3.55 rear, which will lop another half-second off the time. Pentastar Chargers seem to be a popular item among the young and aggressive crowd here, and this four-cylinder Mustang will pull car lengths on them by a mere 40 mph. Even a 5.7-liter Hemi V8 won’t catch it until somewhere around the quarter mile…which essentially means it isn’t catching it. Hemi street performance out of a 4-cylinder base Mustang?
I came to really enjoy driving this car. There are internet video reviewers who didn’t. They wanted to autocross it, power drift it, bang it off the rev limiter, and thump away at paddle shifters at twice the posted speed limit. Silly. That’s track behavior, and they should just get the GT.
This isn’t a track. This is better. I drove several hours of narrow rural central Arkansas two lane and was smitten with both the car and the scenery. Gently winding roads sheltered by the patchwork shade of overhanging trees and birdsong everywhere. Undulating open fields with miles of horizon cut by islands of trees. The pavement is rippled and patched; you’ll appreciate the compliant ride. The roads are narrow with no shoulder; you’ll appreciate the accurate steering when the rare 18 wheeler comes your way. It’s not serpentine but there are turns and you don’t have to slow down for them because the Mustang can definitely corner. You can let the turbos pull you through and then haul you far over the limit on the next straight, before the rapidly increasing rush of air reminds you to slow back down before you get yourself into a heap of trouble, boy.
I’m having a good time. This is a great car for this environment. I’ve got more power than I can use. I’ve got more cornering ability than the road requires. I’ve got a suspension that communicates but doesn’t beat me up. I’ve got more scenery than I can take in while still eyeing the road. I’m getting 35 miles per gallon even with occasional corner exit blasts. Really, what are you going to do with a GT and its 150 extra horsepower out here? Get pulled over by the only sheriff in the county who decided to stake out this particular nothing-road on this particular nothing-weekday, that’s what. You can’t attack these corners any more aggressively, and the power difference won’t show up until you’ve revved out and hit truly reckless speeds.
This car is not perfect. The steering is accurate and appropriately quick, but completely numb and provides no information about what the front end is doing in a turn. You don’t need to be driving like a maniac to notice this, and it left me wanting. Ford knows how to make a good EPS. They just didn’t do it here.
The second issue is the subjective behavior of the engine and 10-speed automatic. There is a vexing inconsistency in power delivery, shift logic, and engine tone. In Sport mode with a moderate to heavy foot, the powertrain is snappy, responsive, and fairly predictable, whether from a stop or a roll, and the exhaust tone has enough character to cover the typical four-cylinder thrash. But in too many other situations, the shift logic and throttle mapping are difficult to predict. The power delivery then becomes lumpy, the engine surging in and out of boost with gear changes, the exhaust note burping and undulating in response. This is not an inherently smooth and refined engine, and this behavior calls attention to that.
After a few days, I had learned my way around some of this powertrain’s weird behavior by modifying my driving, but the rest I simply had to accept. Over the course of 700 miles of lighter in-town use, 75 mph freeway, the two-lanes, and putting a few Chargers in their place, it returned 27 mpg. That makes up for a bit of eccentricity.
Speaking of eccentricity, Ford has a real pony fetish with this car. Rather than leaning predictably into ranching and cowboying as with the F-150, Ford went cute with the Mustang. As I approached the car the first night, I saw a bright white Mustang icon appear on the ground beneath the mirror. Ford names this feature (and I’m serious here) the “Pony Puddle Lamp”. Ford must have had a specific masculine image in mind when it conjured up the term “Pony Puddle”, but all I can think of is a fat little horse peeing itself.
There’s also a blackout trim package called “Nite Pony”. Perhaps this was named by people who didn’t raise a girl within the last 30 years, because it sounds like a My Little Pony character—one getting ready to go have a big night on the town. Nite Pony gonna get crazy! Maybe a little too crazy. Maybe lose control and make an embarrassing Pony Puddle.
None of this is printed anywhere on the car itself, so it doesn’t matter. I think Ford did well with the Mustang. As an entry point for the model, the EcoBoost is far from embarrassing. It provides a lot of acceleration, chassis capability, and interior refinement for a reasonable price. With the Performance Package, it steps into sports car territory. With the Premium Package, it’s a viable entry-level personal luxury coupe, of which so few remain. The fetching Vapor Blue Metallic with Emberglo interior is a rare and striking combination. I could go for that, and a quiet rural road extending to the horizon.
PETRICHOR, Excellent review; the best I’ve read in a long, long time.
Thanks! It was fun.
Of the automotive progress in the last 35 years, it sounds like a four-cylinder Mustang is on the front tip of the spear in those vast improvements.
You are very correct about the lumpy and inconsistent power delivery of the 2.3 liter, although my familiarity comes from a ’23 Explorer I am assigned at work. It’s a fun engine in the Explorer (odd noises and all) and I can only imagine how much more potent it feels in a lighter Mustang.
This was a great review of a car I have eyed from a distance but have never so much as even looked at the inside.
Let me speculate on rental company…Enterprise?
RWD Explorer = Mustang wagon!
Yes, it’s plenty potent in this Mustang. Jason Camissa with Hagerty made a drag race video with this Mustang (with the shorter rear axle ratio) pitted against other quick vehicles in this price range and it’s a good watch–very high production value. The way the Mustang leaves the line and gaps all the others before ~60mph is really impressive. A GT wouldn’t be very far ahead. Less of a top end though, that’s where the GT would leave it in the dust.
Very nice bit of writing, it had drama and two main characters, you and the car. The plot was your relationship. I too would prefer a Fiesta ST.
Thanks James. Love my ST, the amount of driving enjoyment they could engineer into that little crap-can is still impressive to me.
My cousin rented one of these cars for a blast up the west coast, he reckoned it was ok as a cruiser and went ok with the turbo 4 engine, he said hed rent one again but already has a Alfa V6 at home for a sporty summer ride so wont be buying one.
Excellent review. I too ended up with an 2024 EcoBoost Mustang convertible by chance. My wife and I traveled to the East Coast of Canada. We had reserved an intermediate car but when we got to the Enterprise counter they gave us three choices. A Ram pickup, a Mustang convertible or a Kia Soul. Even before she finished the word Mustang, I had jumped in and said we will take the Mustang.
My experience with it was similar. I really enjoyed the car. Having driven lots of older Pony cars with base engines I wasn’t expecting much in the way of performance but this Ecoboost was excellent. Lots of power, good response and fuel economy about on par with our old Outback 2.5L. Although not called the GT, this car was really a great grand tourer, probably better in many ways than an actual Mustang GT. It had a great combination of ride and handling, excellent performance and it was just a fantastic car to explore the east coast back roads and highways, especially with the top down.
Having done some grand touring in my Dad’s 2012 Vette convertible and also having lots of seat time in my brother’s 2017 Camaro SS, it doesn’t live up the V8 performance. And having also rented a late model Charger R/T with a V8, the EcoBoost may offer similar performance but I think the V8 power delivery feels much better and snappier off the line. That said, the EcoBoost Mustang gives about 85% of the experience, which is far better than the old V6 Mustangs of yore.
While I did not really care for the touch screen based controls, I did like that I could change the cluster to have Fox Mustang styled gauges. Having many fond memories of my Cousin’s 1990 GT, it was neat to see and made the gauges more readable. The one negatives were the visibility wasn’t great with the top up, at least in city traffic, and the trunk was tiny. We could not fit our airline luggage entirely the trunk and one of the large bags had to go in the back seat. I suppose in comparison to my Dad’s Vette, which also has a small trunk, at least it has the back seat for extra storage for overflow unlike the Vette.
Overall, I was impressed with the EcoBoost Mustang. While I’d likely only ever buy V8 Mustang, this particular car was of the few truly really enjoyable modern car experiences I have had; it truly was fun to drive and had character.
Here is a picture of the one I rented:
The Pony Puddle Lights in the parking garage:
Pony Puddle! It’s galloping to find an open restroom!
Wonderful, in-depth review! Congrats on winning the rental lottery! I did so as well last weekend, expecting a Trailblazer and getting an MB GLB at Sixt. Drove very well and with the mild hybrid gave me 39 mpg over 430 miles. Very solid vehicle.
Did the Mustang have the fake engine sound option? Is that an option on the Ecoboost? Certainly has enough power….just need a “rumble” (real or fake) to go with that car…
I’m not sure if it had fake engine noises. It wouldn’t surprise me because it sounded inconsistent. At least some of the sound was originating from the tailpipe but some seemed like it was everywhere.
I had one for a rental and enjoyed it. It was 2 years ago so it had the analog gauges and neat row of toggles on the dash. One of those toggles had drive mode controls so you could fully defeat the traction. And ‘stability’ controls. Quite the hooner. With a stick it would have been quite attractive.
No more stick with the EcoBoost! Ended in 2023, unfortunately…
When we were looking for a car to complement our Tacoma in late 2017, the four cylinder turbo Mustang convertible was under consideration, though it didn’t make the short list (we got a 4 cylinder turbo VW hatchback). My own Mustang convertible rental experience was in an SN95 in a New England summer. Hot and humid with rain; not a great convertible experience not to mention cheap plastic overload in the interior. My previous time behind the wheel of a Mustang soft top was when I was 18, in a friend’s 1965, 289 3 speed with Pony Package … that also influenced my negative feelings about the SN95. Good review!
Ha, yes, this Mustang is an Aston Martin Vantage compared to an SN95 with the Essex.
I rented a similar spec Mustang seven years ago on a trip to Key West. This was the S550 generation, but aside from a few Ipads on the dash, its pretty much the same car. As you, I found the Ecoboost provided decent thrust for a heavy convertible with an automatic. Unlike you though, I have owned many a V8 pony car, and once you’ve driven one of those anything less leaves something to be desired. For a wind in your hair, smell of palm trees experience though, it was perfect.
Troublesome to me is the outrageous cost of these cars. Forty plus grand for a 4-cylinder Mustang? The Mustang was always about affordable V8 power for the masses. A typical spec GT is now well over fifty grand. I think Ford lost the script.
No doubt the V8 has a more desirable subjective character; the personality of the 2.3 is one of the weakest aspects of the car despite its performance.
What I think Ford did exceptionally well with the EcoBoost Mustang is make it a genuinely strong performer rather than just a cheap spec bought because one can’t afford the V8. The V8 is a $13,000 upcharge, however, so in many ways that is still the case. But it’s no longer embarrassing.
$41K is a big number but it isn’t what it used to be. You can load a Camry up to that number. A base XL short cab 4×4 F-150 is $46K. The nearest competitor to a Premium Mustang is a BMW 430i and that’s a good fifteen grand more and provides no better performance. Seems like a decent price given the power and equipment level, and a base EcoBoost fastback starts at $35K.
Thanks for another delightful review, as always. You really took me along on that late night drive, although I would have preferred driving it myself.
Ford has had lots of time to keep evolving the Mustang, so it’s not a big surprise that it’s as competent as it has become. They’ve carved out a solid niche with it.
Pony Puddle? Well, better that than the real thing. But still…
Thanks Paul. This Mustang does feel well-evolved. It does a lot of things right without presenting any obvious shortcomings.
I had one of these as rental in Jacksonville a number of years ago (when the ecoboost in a mustang was a much newer thing) Your review sounds similar, even thou they updated the car since then. My thing was it was a fun car to drive but the power delivery and driving experience felt more oversize hot hatch then muscle cars. In some ways that’s good it feels a bit like a GLI or a WRX but wrapped in a strange package, and the engine noise doesn’t really feel right compared to the looks. But it is fun. Compared to the previous Gen with the v6 the handling and perfromance are much sharper but If iwas spending money in the class I think I would have picked a Camaro.
“the power delivery and driving experience felt more oversize hot hatch then muscle cars”
I think there’s a lot of truth to this, particularly the power delivery. As a hot hatch owner, it also probably explains some of my affection for this Mustang and my willingness to not expect or demand a V8 in it.
Excellent writing, and a fine review. It does well for a 21 y.o. platform.
Because we live in a time of somewhat repellent scrunched-up anger as the dominant styling theme, I feel mean-spirited picking upon this Ford for its looks, as it isn’t much of that school, but I must also say that it’s of no particular school at all, either. It fails to move me in mysterious ways, which is a pity for a car where that’s a great deal of the point.
Wouldn’t say no to a fang in one, mind you, and that Vapor Blue is indeed a beautiful color.
The 6th generation (2015) was very heavily changed from the previous one with an all-new IRS and essentially new front suspension as well as many other significant changes to the “platform”. I suspect there was not much carryover.Maybe some floor boards?
The suspension changes were widely acknowledged to make this current generation significantly more sophisticated, specific target as Ford’s strategy was to increase international sales, which it has done with not inconsiderable success.
The 2.3L engine is in actually a Mazda design with a little head work from Ford FWIW.
Excellent review – and of a car that I’ve occasionally wondered about. It’s tough to find good, real-world and well-written reviews of cars like this.
You really hit the rental jackpot here, not only with the car itself, but on a 700-mi. trip as well. The payoff compensated for the flight delays.
I admit I had to re-read your description of the Pony Puddle Lamp. It’s seemed too odd to be true. Really, Ford should enable drivers to turn that off – maybe by a dashboard button labeled “PP”.
Thanks Eric. Yes, big jackpot! And very much worth the airport delay. The weather was also perfect for a convertible, I was able to spend most of those miles with the roof lowered. Nice experience.
My 2015 makes Pony Puddles, and I have no problem with it. In fact, I rather like it. Gimmicky but fun.
I feel very encouraged by this. I’ve always had a soft spot for the Mustang, but in base guise this car used to be a dog. I haven’t paid much attention in recent years, and to know now that it’s a hoot to drive even with the four, it feels like something in the world is really right.
Beautifully written.
Thanks Jim.
I was pleasantly surprised by this car. A base Mustang is now a fairly serious proposition.
Great report and very tempting car. Only I am trapped in a time warp where any car over $30K seems ridiculous. That is almost twice as much as the last two new cars I bought. However, that large screen which ruins the dash, and lack of manual means not ever.
“I am trapped in a time warp where any car over $30K seems ridiculous”
I’m kind of there with you. It’s one thing to note that $41K is a fully competitive price in today’s market. It’s entirely another to be willing to make the monthly payments on such an MSRP.
A very nice review. Thank you.
The 2.3 Turbo has come a long way since I had one in my 1987 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe. HP was only 190 (tho fairly strong for the time) with an 8 second trip to 60 and 16 seconds at 85 mph for the 1/4 mile. I currently have a 2012 Mustang Shelby GT500 convertible which I love!
Thank you again for a very interesting and well written review.
Thanks. If I’m not mistaken the 2.3 in the Thunderbird was a different unrelated engine, but the advancements in technology over the years have indeed produced some incredible gains from the same cylinder count and displacement.
You aren’t mistaken. I had an ‘88 Turbo Coupe, and the engine in that Thunderbird was the Lima 2.3… that’s right, the same engine that came in Pintos and Mustang II(s) and maybe even early Foxes.
For ‘87 & ‘88 Ford boosted (pun intended) the performance with an intercooler, similar I guess to the ‘84 SVO Mustang, but this was the same old Lima.
The newer eco-Boost 2.3L is a whole ‘nutha animal. Someone here said it was related to a Mazda engine, which may or may not be true, but Mazda and Ford were married at one point, so believable. Anyway, today’s eco-Boost is not your father’s 2.3 Liter I-4.
I recall that Turbo Coupe… look up NVH in the dictionary, and you’ll see its picture!
I have had so many unfortunate experiences renting cars at airports. 1972, rented a Lincoln at Miami International, during a rain storm I hit the first curb leaving the airport. Result two flat tires. My fault and too many drinks on the plane but they still rented me another car.
Last time I flew was a nightmare. Richmond VA to Ottawa Ontario. Arrived Newark, switch planes, flights cancelled due to weather. But I kept seeing planes take off and landing. I was stranded at that damn Newark airport for 36 hours. No hotels available, no rent cars. I would have rented a car and drove from Newark to Ottawa but no rental cars available. I am 70+ years old, I slept on the cold hard floor for days.
My past airport auto experiences not positive. I have tried to rent a convertible many times and ended up with an SUV. The rental agencies act like they are doing me a favor ‘up-grading’ from a convertible to an SUV. I hate airports, I hate car rental agencies at airports.
Alfred, I want you to stop renting or flying, and buy one of these to cross the country with, ASAP
You deserve it if you spent 36hrs in Newark.
Great write-up, and congrats on winning the rental car lottery.
These eco-Boosts are great, but I truly miss that there is no longer a V6 option. To me (and my opinion is OBVIOUSLY biased) the V6 was the sweet spot for basic grand tourer performance without actually being a GT Mustang.
I like your assessment of the Premium Package being like a PLC. This is why I picked my own V6 Premium many years ago. My 2007 is about as close to my preferred Thunderbirds as I could get at the time.
My Dad’s 2014 (last of my generation) had that feature, but I had NO IDEA it was called a Pony Puddle… what a dumb name. His car was also a V6, but the more powerful 3.7L and the Pony Package, which was like a GT Mustang with better handling due to better weight distribution. This 3.7L briefly made it to the S550 generation before its elimination in favor of the eco-Boost. For a short time around 2015 or so, you could get all three! V8, V6, or Turbo-i4… your choice.
My Dad’s Mustang (which he no longer has)…
Sharp pair of Mustangs there, Rick. I really dig that red.
Thanks!
My Dad said when he bought that car in late 2013, that the color was called Ruby Red and was unique to the 2014 model year.
I believe that they carried the color over to the S550 for at least its first year, 2015. Both of my parents have always liked red cars and have had more than a few of them over the years.
Am I the only one who thinks the side views of Mustang convertibles and Camaro convertibles are closer together than they should be?
I enjoyed the review, but the idea of a turbocharged 4 still kind of sticks in my throat. Yes, I’m sure it’s far better than those of yore, but I would hate the suspense over whether Ford has gotten its Eco Boost house in order yet. Of course, that doesn’t matter when you rent. Jackpot indeed!
Beautifully written essay about the harmonic convergence of luck, rental cars, weather and location. The only car Bill Clinton owned while president was a first-gen Mustang, so perhaps your rental agency was simply channeling some of that energy into their fleet.
I have been renting cars regularly for nearly 40 years now and have found that I have a 1-in-10 chance of winning the rental car lottery, meaning a major upgrade to something interesting. Oddly, during a two-year stint in which I flew into Little Rock 12-15 times a year, I often scored very nice rentals, if not something as sublime as a Mustang. These were often brand new (less than 100 miles on the odometer), top-of-the-line versions of cars like the Chrysler 300C, Dodge Challenger, Audi A4 and Q5, Ford Explorer, and Cadillac XT6.
This latest Mustang seems like it could be an ideal second car for many people and an ideal compromise between an old-fashioned muscle car and a more modern hot hatch. Thanks for taking us along for a ride.
Interesting writeup, I was actually jealous of you as you described driving off at night with the top down. Back when I owned a convertible, one of my favorite times to drive it top down was warm summer nights. Few automotive feelings can top that.
As a Mustang owner, I’m glad to hear about good experiences. Mine is a 2015, which is technically the previous generation, but this current generation is structurally the same car. Really only the styling is (a little) changed. The biggest noticeable difference is that dash, which I’m not a fan of but it probably is functionally OK. The 2015-23 has HVAC and audio controls on the screen, but they are mostly duplicated on physical knobs and buttons, the best of both worlds.
I think you answered your own question about why somebody would get the GT when the Ecoboost has such good performance. Currently, a manual transmission is only available on the GT. I haven’t driven a GT auto, but from what I’ve read I doubt the programming is as fussy and oriented to maximum mpg as the Ecoboost. Then there’s always the intangible qualities of the V8, like sound, feel, powerband, etc.
I’ve never seen or thought about Vapor Blue with Emberglo, but you’re right that is a cool combo!
New Mustang prices are really high, which is a bit reason why I have a 2015. Adjusted for inflation, though, they are pretty much the same as they were 15 years ago. And even base models have quite a bit of content and Premium models are truly nice.
Late model Mustangs really are comfortable, easy to use cars. If you can live without an adult sized back seat and don’t mind sitting so low, it’s a practical vehicle that drives better than lots of other cars and SUVs. In my experience they are pretty reliable, especially if they’re not abused. I suspect that a lot of people who would enjoy owning one never even consider it.
I have a 2019 Bullitt which is my absolute favorite car I’ve ever owned, probably will always be! It’s such a great well rounded and comfortable car, Ford nailed it when they released this generation for 2015! I too agree I do not care for the new dash, I feel like it lost its unique Mustang look.
Mustangs have still got a little magic left.
+500… GT-500 that is… 😂🤣