As much as the 70s was the era of malaise when it came to cars, it was a much better period for American trucks. The big pickups, particularly Chevys and Fords, were considered some of the best ever made up to that point in time, and in many ways much better than those that followed. This was also the era that brought us the Biggest Bronco ever.
The original Bronco had been a vehicle unique to the Big 3 when it arrived in Ford showrooms for 1966. The original Bronk was aimed not so much at the Jeep CJ as at the International Scout and the Jeepster – vehicles that, with varying success, mated the CJ’s offroad capability with at least some of the creature comforts that most people came to expect by the mid 60s. The first Bronco was certainly the biggest seller of the early attempts to civilize the Jeep. But by the early 70s, the market was moving.
The1969 K5 Blazer was a new concept. Rather than a unique vehicle, Chevrolet simply shortened the existing pickup. This provided a larger, more comfortable vehicle that provided substantial savings in the use of common parts.
Then in 1971, International Harvester introduced the Scout II. A bit smaller than the Blazer, it still made the Bronco seem crude by comparison.
The Blazer’s and Scout’s success was not lost on Ford. The company had a new F series truck in the oven for 1973, and work was begun on a shortened variant to replace the old Bronco, which had gone largely unchanged since 1966. The plan was for a new F series-based Bronco for 1974. However, the 1973 Arab oil embargo and the resulting fuel shortages and price spikes caused Ford to shelve the big Bronco. Instead, the company continued to sell the old one.
By 1976-77, the 1973 “energy crisis” seemed like a distant memory and the big stuff was selling again. The companies had some more efficient designs coming, but they were not quite ready. At Ford, a lighter weight F series was in development for 1980 that would include a Bronco variant. But in the meantime, Ford was doing very well with its current F series, which many Ford truck guys consider the best that Ford ever offered. Ford was also a leader with its then-new E series vans. But the old Bronco was getting its head kicked in by the Blazer and even the Scout. So even though there was only two years left in the model cycle, Ford dusted off the proposed 74 Bronco and introduced it as a 1978.
By the 70s, trucks and vans had moved way beyond the limited market of farmers, ranchers and tradesmen which had been the primary customers of these vehicles through the 60s. By the late 70s, trucks were becoming “lifestyle vehicles”. It should be no wonder that when compared to the bloated, toothless cars of the era, trucks became a mainstream alternative for the young and hip. And finally, Ford offered a Bronco that could not only take you off road, but could do so in air conditioned, power steeringed, power windowed, c b radio jabbering, woodgrained comfort.
It was into this atmosphere that Ford created the Free Wheelin’ Ford Trucks. The Free Wheelin’ option was largely a stripe and graphics package with some blackout trim and unique wheels. Variants of the package adorned pickups, vans and our CC Bronco. Free Wheelin’ and otherwise, the 78 Bronco was a big hit, outselling the 77 little Bronco by a wide margin. Even my Uncle Bob, no offroader he, had an orange and white 78 Bronco.
If we ignore its size and look at sheer capability, the big Bronk is hailed by offroaders as the only full sized Broncos with a solid axle and the torquey 400 cid V8. From 1980 onward (the O. J. Broncos?) the solid differential was replaced by a different design which the die hards consider inferior to the 78-79 models. Add this to the fact that the 78-79 Bronco is based on what many fans of the blue oval consider Ford’s toughest pickup ever, it is no wonder that these have a following. And that they can still be found doing their thing.
When I found the subject of today’s CC, I had no idea how rare it was. It hit me that I had not seen one of the Big Bronks in quite awhile. If I had ever known it, I had forgotten that this vehicle was offered only in 1978 and 79. Paul loves cars with patina, and this Bronk has loads of it. In Indiana, we have another word for patina – rust. But still, it is not bad for its age in this climate. The Free Wheelin’ Bronco strikes me as the hard-partying little brother of the F 250. Even so, this particular unit is still able to get up in the morning and do a full days work.
These big Broncos bring out strong opinions. To some, they are signs of the bloated, oversized 70s that nearly sunk Detroit in the early 80s. To me, though, they represent Ford’s attempt to give us everything we wanted (at least in 1978): size, comfort, looks, durability and genuine go-anywhere capability. That it came with a pop-off rear roof is just a bonus. Actually, as I think about it, did Ford division make anything in 1978 that I would rather have today? A Fairmont wagon comes closest, but isn’t it awfully – well- practical? This car fairly screams “1970s”. Not the Brougham 70s, but the Keep On Truckin’ 70s. So maybe this lifelong midwesterner will add one of these to the list of cars to own before I die. Then waddya say we pick up some beer and head to the beach for some volleyball?














It brings out strong opinions – because, I submit, many of us are torn. It’s strong; it’s attractive; it is – as noted – a variant of one of the most successful pickup series Ford ever ran. The only thing left to ask is…wassit FOR? It’s not very practical as a station wagon. A minivan holds more, much more – people or cargo – with less bulk It’s inconvenient and unsafe as a load-hauling pickup, with the roof insert removed. A four-wheeler is much more agile off-road – even an earlier Bronco or a Jeep is going to be able to make trail easier than the wide F-series Bronco.
But it has its appeal, like a glamor pickup useless to work; or a topless roadster garage queen. Like so many other cars, “practical” isn’t part of the equation. And at this date, it’s part of our history.
Celebrate it. The time to wonder, is when the next outrage appears on the market.
Celebrate it. The time to wonder, is when the next outrage appears on the market.
Nissan Murano convertible?
Wassit for? Minivans are more practical? Your WIFE is supposed to drive the minivan! The man of the house drives this manly Bronco. He is a hunter, or a boater, he tows frequently, and he needs 4 wheel drive to go along with his shotgun and rifle, so he can survive.
Joking aside, dad fit the target demographic for Broncos, except his was a Bronco II, which he preferred due to greater agility, even if it was a death trap. He didn’t need an open pickup bed as much as enclosed storage because he played more than he worked. He also had a Wrangler hardtop for the same reasons, but given the choice again I bet he’d go with another Bronco just because those Wranglers beat you to death. They’re fun until you have to get on the highway.
its called livin the bachelors dream, and while your taking instruction from your wife whose gettin a little heavier every year why dont you tell me whats practical.and do tell what are you drivin?
The original Bronco was one of those cars on my list for my first-ever new vehicle purchase in 1975. I wound up with a 3/4 ton Chevy pickup, but that’s another story already told on here and TTAC.
When these larger models came out, along with the full-sized offerings from Chevy and Dodge and Plymouth, what was the very first turn-off for me? Well, I’ve had this certain “disease” for a very long time – the long side glass with no sliding or opening windows for the rear seat passengers! I’ve always been a “fresh air fiend” and all these vehicles went against my grain. On the K-10 Blazers, there was a sliding window option, but apparently not many were built as I only saw few equipped like that – I’m referring to 1973 and up.
One thing these vehicles did have though – they could pretty much go anywhere and be comfortable about doing it!
After my large pickup gas-hog experience for two years, I never went back to vehicles like this. I like them, but can’t bear paying to feed them. They were special, just the same, though.
I forgot to add that there is a magnificently restored original-style Bronco in town not far from where I live that is orange with black interior. I feel drool forming whenever I see it, but that’s also true for the just-as-gorgeous Scout ll that runs around here, too.
Those Bronco’s do scream “I LOVE THE 70s!”
Even though I was born in 1977 I never saw too many of these around even in farm country where I grew up. I believe it was the rust that got them or they just weren’t that popular with people who could use them for their true capabilities instead of just “possing” as an urban cowboy. (In my little corner of Ohio anyway.) Bronco II’s on the other hand… were all over the freaking place, even into the late 1990s!
My Grandfather had one of the orginals (one of his excentricities of being a GM factory worker who only drove Fords) and he LOVED it. There were days in the winter that if the roads were nasty while he was driving home he would leave the road and start out accross the farm fields in 4×4 mode. (In those days fields would lie fallow in the winter, not like today where there’s likely a crop under that snowbank waiting for spring.)
The legendary Bob Hannah had one of these….
Great find and write-up. It’s the companion to the truck I found about a year ago:
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/04/curbside-classic-outtake-free-wheelin/
I missed the outtake you did at TTAC – you captured the whole line. You also made the Pinto Cruising Wagon tie-in that I wanted to make – but mine was going a little long and I decided to stick with the “real” trucks. Don’t these just make you want to listen to some Allman Brothers or some Lynard Skynard on an 8 track? OK, maybe not.
“Don’t these just make you want to listen to some Allman Brothers or some Lynard Skynard on an 8 track? OK, maybe not.”
Speaking personal, I never want to hear that so-called “classic rock” ever again! I compare that “music” from what came before as the “fixed rear side windows” of music! Ha!
I learned to drive in a 1984 K5 Blazer, and have fond memories of them, and of that type of vehicle, rare as they are becoming. With luggage on the roof and strapped to a small trailer hitch platform, we made a lot of four-person trips from Houston to Colorado and I don’t remember it being too punishing, except for that the smog-strangled 305 was absolutely tortured on mountain grades. It was always fun to go on rides in the spring with the rear half-roof removed.
The Wrangler is now nearly large enough to be this vehicle, but Wranglers will always be of a different concept. The Toyota FJ and Hummer H3 are close – impractical, thirsty, adventurously styled off-roaders but even they don’t have the requisite “truckishness,” which I think has to do with the amount of plastic.
You mention all the other competition except the Dodge Ramcharger? While Ford shelved their fullsize Bronco, Dodge brought out the Ramcharger in 1973. The first gen Ramcharger (1973-80) had the removable roof. The second gen (1981-1993) had a fixed roof. If I recall correctly, the regulations changed to require shoulder belts for the rear seat. Dodge didn’t want to make a rollbar standard equipment to mount the shoulder belt to, and most owners never removed the roof anyhow.
I think Dodge made a mistake in not continuing the Ramcharger into a 3rd generation (except in Mexico) when they redesigned their pickups for 1994. The SUV market was taking off, and their Durango didn’t appear until 1998.
Point well taken on the Ramcharger. In truth, I had forgotten about the 1st generation. My bad. I agree with you that the 94 trucks were just begging for a Ramcharger (and a Suburban fighter, too).
I remember about the time the ’94 Dodge trucks came out, reading that the Ramcharger couldn’t be continued for CAFE reasons, though I don’t know how accurate that is.
I’ve always admired these Broncos (and the K5 Blazer, and Ramcharger), although I don’t know that I’d actually want to own one. And the Bronco, particularly in white, occupies a special place in LA car culture, of course.
I test-drove a Plymouth Trail Duster with a buddy one day in October 1977. We drove all over the western counties outside the St. Louis area and racked up a couple hundred miles. The vehicle was used, I don’t recall the year, but we had a good time. The vehicle was one his brother was trying to sell for a friend and gave it to him for the weekend. Being a newlywed, I made sure I got home in time for dinner, too!
My friend didn’t buy the car and my dear wife wasn’t mad at me either – she went shopping!
Dodge did build a Ramcharger from 99-01. Sadly they felt the U.S. had no use for it.
I did mention above that they built a 3rd gen Ramcharger in Mexico. To my knowledge, it was designed in-house by Chrysler of Mexico, and its handling was not particularly good. It also used the rear liftgate door from the Chrysler minivan.
My guess is that the Dodge fullsize pickup redesign for 94 had a tight budget, and there wasn’t enough resources to do the Ramcharger. The extended cab version of the pickup even had to wait til 95.
My ideal (nonexistent) truck would be a 4-door Ramcharger with the 94-2001 styling. Drop it on the 2500 chassis with a Cummins 12-valve up front, and offer it in RWD. If it was available, I would have looked for one of those instead of my 94 RAM2500 Cummins. Wishful thinking.
This tread needs a photo:
There is a great Free Wheelin’ Ford Commercial on Youtube, complete with 70′s country music style jingle…
Get ready for the Free Wheelin’ Fords! Super Trick Ford Machines…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaJvPkJaEXk
Awesome
A friend bought this model F100 4WD short WB 351 motor all the fruit it was a great looking truck except off road where it was absolutely useless any real 4WD ie Landrover or Land cruiser left it floundering in fact it slid all over the show following my holden across a steep paddock It didnt seem to matter what tyres were on it or the diff lock worked or not it could not go off the tracks. No doubt hes still got it as the repair bill to keep it running was huge every single mechanical item failed so while the F series might be the be all and end all inthe US outside we expect better performance and reliability.A beer at the beach is just about the limit for these the pickups were ok but as a 4WD get a Landy
The Big Bronco was a reaction to the K5 Blazer being a hit throughout the 70′s. The root of SUV mania are these trucks, I think. The Suburban was also climbing the sales charts, but Ford didn’t think they needed a 4 door. 2 doors were still the ‘sporty style’ then.
Gas Crunch of 79-82 brought the ‘baby’ Blazer, Bronco II and Cherokee, but they grew.