Could a gas V8 designed for heavy-truck usage and weighing more than half a ton have been the ideal engine for a Bonneville streamliner in the 1950s? Rod & Custom Magazine thought so, and they explained why in their October 1955 issue.
If the racy red roadster that you could build yourself for less than the cost of a new Ford didn’t prompt a young hot rodder to pass a quarter across the newsstand, perhaps the headline would have: “REO V8: New Competition Engine?” That should have been enough to pique the interest of anyone with a mechanical mindset.

That’s because the Gold Comet was not intended for automotive usage at all; it was, however, advertised as “the crowning achievement of 50 years,” a celebration of 50 years of REO engineering. REO Motor Car Company was begun by Ransom E. Olds after he left his namesake company over a disagreement with the company’s directors about the direction the company was taking. REO began building trucks in 1908, and that’s what they eventually became best known for doing. Introduced a few years after the Gold Comet 6, the V8 displaced a burly 440 cubic inches, and it had a good, long run for an engine designed in the 1950s, with production lasting until 1975. Here it is in all its finery as it would be installed in a big REO truck.
There’s little evidence that anyone took the Gold Comet seriously as a performance engine except Bob Behme at Rod & Custom Magazine. He talked to engineer Ted Mengles from Mameco Engineering, who thought that the Gold Comet was “THE only American engine with the potential to take the International Class B records away from Auto Union.” (The Auto Union streamliners are a story of their own.) Behme’s article is hypothetical, two men talking about an engine’s possibilities, and it becomes clear that hopping up a REO would not be a cheap proposition. But it was a good starting point for a variety of reasons, including its standard 220 horsepower and 405 lb.-ft. of torque at 3000 and 2000 RPM respectively (these numbers would later rise to 235 horsepower and 412 lb.-ft.). Behme compares the Gold Comet to the Buick 322, which had larger valves (really?) but less torque. What he doesn’t mention is that the Buick was also a smaller engine in every way.

REO did brag that the Gold Comet was “shorter than any other heavy-duty truck engine—only 39 1/2″ long from front of fan to rear of flywheel housing.” It was also lighter at 1,211 pounds, meaning that Mr. Behme’s figures were a little light in Rod & Custom (he quoted 1,110). Just as the magazine discussed ways to chop some weight off of the big REO, the company itself was bragging about its power-to-weight ratio of 5.51 pounds per horsepower, which compared positively to other truck engines whose figures were as poor as 14:1. For the sake of a performance engine, that figure could be improved by simply removing the huge air compressor from the front of the engine, as no streamliner would have to worry about air brakes.
One thing that would have had to be dealt with was that flywheel housing and its unique mounting brackets. Being that the 1950s was the heyday of the home hot rodder and his willingness to cut-and-try, hacking off the cast-iron housing and replacing it with something more adaptable to an automotive manual transmission would have been feasible. I can’t even imagine the time you’d spend working out the measurements, and drilling and tapping mounting holes, etc. Behme suggested that the then-plentiful Cad/LaSalle three-speed would have stood up to the REO’s torque, and in a land-speed situation, nobody was speed-shifting, so it really only had to channel the power through top gear.
The article mentions that a Gold Comet on a test stand in the Los Angeles area was capable of 6,000 RPM and more, but the small valve size would have been an impedance. Behme continues:
The stock valves are sodium cooled. The valves, by way of explanation, are hollow and filled with sodium—a metal which melts at a very low temperature. During operation, heat from the engine tends to melt the sodium which “sloshes” around inside the valve thus aiding in keeping it cool. With a large-valve Comet, though, this heavy-duty feature of cooled valves would probably not be necessary.
One way to cut down the engine’s weight would have been to replace the heavy cast-iron intake manifold with an aluminum unit. The only problem would be that nobody built aluminum performance manifolds for a REO V8, so one would have had to be fabricated; not to mention, land-speed mavens would have likely strapped a Roots blower on top, negating any weight savings anyway. Notice the Holley “Teapot” 4000 four-barrel carburetor mounted on this Gold Comet; it was a similar carburetor to that which Ford used on its 312 T-Birds in the mid-1950s.

REO did brag about its manifold’s design, a water-cooled dual-plane unit that minimized “fluctuations and variations in the flow of [the] fuel mixture.” The carburetor even had an automatic choke, a neat feature for a 1950s big rig.
Here, Behme and Mengles lay out their plan for Class B speed record domination, and why the REO would be a good foundation on which to start.
- The valves are well-cooled, with “water squirted at the valve head area through tiny jets in the jacket.”
- The cylinder walls are “wet-sleeved,” which “allows [REO] engineers to build the walls out of extremely high quality materials.”
- A high-performance camshaft would have to be ground.
- The crankshaft and main bearings would be strong enough for higher RPM duties.
- The 7.3:1 compression ratio would have to be raised and new pistons made.
- The valves and ports would have to be enlarged, as previously mentioned.
Behme continues:
- Use “hot” fuel. As the 1950s elapsed, this would have certainly included nitromethane, although it depends on the class you’re entering.
- “Add a supercharger with about 15 lbs. boost.” (That’s a lot.)
- “Modify the engine to peak near 5,000 [RPM].”
Another (unnamed) engineer also suggested that a REO Gold Comet tucked into something like the “City of Burbank” streamliner would be a “dream” combination to go after International records.

Since I’ve never heard of a Gold Comet-powered land-speed racer, there must have been insurmountable problems (or at least problems that weren’t worth the effort) in using it as a high-performance platform. Was it the breathing? Porting and polishing were and are common hot-rodding tricks, but would larger ports have “hit water”? The same generous cooling passages that kept the REO alive might have limited its potential for modification, and without having a cutaway of the head in front of me, it is tough to speculate.
Nevertheless, more proof of the REO’s toughness is explained above: It had “replaceable inserts in both intake and exhaust valve seats” and “bronze valves guides…throughout.” Theoretically, that meant that in combination with the Gold Comet’s wet sleeves, the engine was almost infinitely rebuildable as long as parts were available.
It was a neat theory of Mr. Behme’s, and it comes from a world that has sadly passed away. The 1950s and 1960s were full of innovative hot rodders who were looking anywhere to gain the slightest advantage in classes, and they were unafraid to stuff almost any engine under almost any hood (or streamliner). Engineers saw the tough Gold Comet V8 and saw nothing but a V8 engine with overhead valves, a distributor in the back, and plenty of potential. Of course, the Chrysler Hemi and the Chevy small-block became THE hot rodders’ choice for decades, but there were still people out combing the rule books, wondering what would fit in what. Land speed racing was and is the home to some of the greatest, and weirdest, ideas. Regardless, spending more money to make less power than a Chrysler Hemi, especially considering that it grew to 392 cubic inches within a year or so, probably didn’t appeal to many.
And while Gold Comets now sit quietly forgotten in the shadows of museums, or under a few hoods at big truck shows, they’re a fine example of American ingenuity and what might have been.
Related Reading
Truck Stop Classic: 1963 REO M35 6×6 Dump Truck – Civilian Job After The Military (by Johannes Dutch)
Museum Outtake: 1974 Diamond REO Raider – Diamonds Aren’t Forever (by me)
Curbside Classic: 1952 REO F-22 – I Can Dig It (by Paul N)

































If I had ever heard of this engine, I had forgotten all about it. Thanks for this interesting look at a now-obscure powerplant. And I love these “what ifs” where people consider the performance capabilities of engines that didn’t see that kind of development from normal channels.
You’re welcome, JP. I’ve been wanting to look into this engine for quite a while, since it’s been sitting in the Olds Museum for years. I was looking into it when I read about the Rod & Custom article, so I bought a copy of the magazine to read about it. Weird stuff, because the Hemi was already out in 1955 and would have been a better choice in just about every way.
I had never heard of it, and I actually worked at a Diamond-REO dealership for a short period.
White also used this engine and they called it the Super Mustang V8. White acquired Reo in 1957.
White also had a 470 cubic inch V8 (4 5/8″ X 3 1/2″) but the pics in my old repair manuals show it to be a different engine than the 440. The 470 also had 4 valves per cylinder and roller tappets. It was rated at 250HP @ 3400 RPM.
The White 470 was known as the ‘Giesel’. It was a Cummins V-8 diesel converted to run on gasoline. Pretty rare, though sometimes seen in the White Constructor vocational trucks in the late 60’s:
I suspected that’s what it was as I knew about the diesel to gas conversion. Seems info is very elusive these days about it.
I got quite a chuckle out of this; it’s pretty off the wall. High performance is all about the cylinder head and its ability to breathe; the REO’s V8 engine was not designed for that, but to churn out lots of torque at low rpm. The speculation about increasing valve size and improving porting is just that, since they did not know to what extent that was actually possible. And then there’s the weight: as much as tow Chevy V8s, one of which could easily make as much power as this did to start with.
If they wanted a big and powerful truck engine, they might have taken a closer look at a Hall-Scott, with its hemi head.
Maybe all the writer of the article saw was a large cubic inch V8 as by the mid 50’s V8 mania was everywhere it seems, big trucks included. Six cylinders were old hat and boring. And no car manufacturer had anything close to a 440 cubic inch V8 at that time.
I wonder if that writer had ever considered the Le Roi/RoiLine V8’s? The largest was twice the size of the 440 in cubic inches and with the exhaust manifolds in the inside of the V, you might consider it “compact”, relatively speaking of course. When that article was written (probably the late spring/early summer of ’55) there might not have been any rumors yet of internationals upcoming big V engines for 1956. 549 cubic inches might have tickled his fancy even more.
Great article! The Reo V-8 was a highly regarded truck engine back in the day, and was probably one of the reasons White bought Reo in 1958. White’s ‘Mustang’ flathead 6’s had a good reputation for durability but were not efficient nor very powerful for their size. Soon after aquiring Reo White began offering the Reo Comet 6’s and Gold Comet V-8’s in their own trucks under the ‘Super Mustang’ name as turbobill pointed out. I have seen a number of White trucks with Reo V-8’s in them, including the 3000 series tilt-cab models. As the years went on the Reo engines also made their way into Diamond-T trucks and were used in Diamond-Reo’s after the merger. When White spun Diamond-Reo off in 1972 Reo’s Lansing engine plant went with it, and the Reo engines remained in production until Diamond-Reo went bankrupt in 1975.
I heard a rumor that Kaiser considered offering the Reo V-8 in the Dragon but the engine was too large and heavy.
Thanks! I’d love to read those meeting minutes at Kaiser if they were thinking of dropping a half-ton 440-cubic-inch V8 into their passenger cars. That would be a Dragon worth the name!
Old truck salesman finds all of our information very interesting. Selling IH’s with heavy-duty gas engines, i understand why these boat anchors are not suited for racing. I drove two of the smaller boat anchors from IH, V-304’s.
Funny to think of a 7.2 litre as a heavy truck engine now…The N-series Cummins was about double that for similar power, being a Diesel. Now that’s a boat anchor.
This pipe dream seems to be a case of a solution looking for a problem – I suppose they thought an LSR car might benefit from the extreme torque & durability.
Does Liberty Belle still hold the truck speed record from 1976? IIRC, that was a ‘street’ Kenworth with a K-series Cummins…
I have a bit of a soft spot for Diamond-REO and its illustrious forebears. One can never have too many diamonds on one grille….
You are right about the N series Cummins being a “boat anchor” as compared to a gasoline engine. Gasoline engines produce more power and torque per cubic inch than diesels. And for similar power the gasoline engines were lighter which allowed more payload. That’s probably why gasoline power held on in heavy trucks through the 50’s and medium trucks through the mid 70’s.
The only real advantage the diesel had going for it was fuel economy and a bit more longevity. And back then diesel fuel was cheaper than gasoline. Where I live today, as I write this, gasoline is $4/gallon and diesel is $6/gallon. As such, I don’t feel so bad about my 4 MPG dump truck with big gasoline power lol.
I guess they saw a really large displacement and gold paint and started going what it? It would be like trying to hot rod an International 392 and how many hot rodded International V8s are thers?
If they really wanted an advanced engine they probably could have found a surplus Ford GAA which was an aluminum DOHC V8 with 4 valves per cylinder that only weighed a few hundred pounds more than a Golden Comet although it was 5′ long, 3′ wide and 4′ tall since its normal home of a Sherman or Pershing tank. On the other hand it was effectively an 18 liter Coyote before its time