
I have always joked that I was my mother’s mid-life crisis. My parents married at 18, and did not have children until their early 30’s. They had only planned to have two children but my mother, then 36, made the snap decision to have one more. I did not fit the plan, nor did I fit into my parents’ cars. And in anticipation of my arrival, my parents purchased their first and only minivan: a 1994 red and gray Ford Aerostar.
While my mother had tolerated wrangling two children into the low-slung 1986 Taurus that served as their family car, she was not willing to do so for three children. She was equally unwilling to crawl into the back of my father’s 1984 GMC Jimmy. Both cars were also stick-shift, and my mother did not want to put up with three screaming children and a clutch.

In what was probably the first and last time my father capitulated to my mother’s automotive wishes, my father agreed to trade the Taurus in on a new 1994 Ford Aerostar. My father, ever the spirited driver, selected a 4.0 Cologne V6-equipped model, making 160 horsepower and, more importantly, 220 lb-ft of torque. This power was directed to all four wheels via a four-speed automatic transmission and Ford’s E4WD system, which allowed for full-time four-wheel drive.
Furthermore, ours was the extended-length model, allowing our family of two adults, three children, and three guinea pigs to carry whatever we wanted in comfort. And we would be quite comfortable indeed, as the van was well-equipped. While I do not recall all the options, I do remember the sound system could be controlled in the middle row, and I do not recollect ever feeling cramped in the van. My father never complained about the options, but he did and still does complain that the van was a minivan.

In early 1994, I came home from the hospital in the Aerostar for the first time. It became one of the places I spent most of my time in; I can still vividly remember the subtle pattern in the gray cloth upholstery, the aforementioned radio controls, and the shape of the distinctive headrests.
As far as minivans go, it was quite competent. It would happily swallow anything you threw at it and carry it wherever you wanted to carry it to in a foot of snow, and it would do it reliably –and even doggedly so under stress. In 9 years of ownership, my father never had to fix anything that was not caused by my mother, my brother, or his own decision to store long, flat metal objects under the van. Even then, that amounted to a few dings that were easily fixed, some scratched paint my father did not want to pay to repair, and a ruined tire that my father would have replaced within six months, when the Firestone tire controversy hit the news.

I had a fairly good childhood. I grew up in Los Alamos, a little town nestled in the mountains of northern New Mexico. Compared to the surrounding areas, Los Alamos is a very safe place to raise a child. It is, however, highly vulnerable to wildfires. In the 1990’s, Los Alamos would be threatened by a number of large wildfires, but none had ever damaged the town.
That changed on May 4, 2000, with the start of a controlled burn meant to reduce the fire risk. The heavy winds that typically hit Los Alamos between April and May whipped the controlled burn into a very foreseeable uncontrolled one that almost immediately made its way into the town. Shortly after, an evacuation order went out.
In the chaos of evacuation, the Aerostar shone. It swallowed the emergency supplies we would ultimately rely on for the next month or so, as well as all three kids and three guinea pigs in their cage. I recall comfortably, but fearfully, watching the fire on the horizon while my mother grumbled at the drivers ahead of us who could not seem to gas up fast enough at our local Texaco. And, when we got trapped in a traffic jam leaving town through the one open road into and out of town, the Aerostar sat cool. What should have been a two-hour drive turned into a four-hour drive. The Aerostar never complained once, nor showed any signs of overheating or any other mechanical failure. Which is why it confused me when my father suddenly replaced it.

In late 2002, due to the Aerostar’s age, my father began shopping for a new family car. It had not broken down at any point in the 9 years it had been with our family, but in his opinion, 9 years was a long time to keep a car. In hindsight, he was probably right insofar as replacing the Aerostar was concerned; while plenty of cars from the 1990s remain on the road 30 years later, the Aerostar is not a common sight anymore.
I’ve been made to understand that the 4.0 Pushrod Cologne V6 was prone to head gasket problems, and the 4-speed automatic in the Aerostar allegedly did not have the finest reputation for longevity, either. Moreover, we had been traveling more, due to my brother’s ever-escalating behavioral problems, and the minivan had been the vehicle of choice for ferrying the family to the hospital and later the group home in which my brother had been placed. This would have put more wear on the Aerostar than usual, and the likelihood that it might strand us in the middle of nowhere became greater every day. After a protracted search for a new car, my father decided on a replacement. Through no fault of its own, it would become the most-hated car my family ever owned.
Note: Opening image, 1995 Aerostar from the Alden Jewell Flickr page.
Related CC reading:
Curbside Classic: 1995 Ford Aerostar -How Hard Can It Be To Make a Minivan (Part 2)
Curbside Find: 1994 Ford Aerostar – Still Polarizing























These were true workhorses, and a step above the Mopar minivans in rugged ability because of RWD and the Ranger frame. They weren’t “cool” by any means, especially compared to the Mopars and GM Dustbusters, but they were hardy.
No frame on an Aerostar it is a unibody. The Ranger of the era had a twin I-Beam front suspension and leaf springs in the rear. The Aerostar had a SLA front suspension and a 3 link coil spring rear suspension.
I stand corrected! I guess my hazy memory of the neighbor’s Aerostar that took a heap of abuse for 10+ years and kept going. They also had a Ranger…
My dad used to say it was technically a truck. I never read too much into it, being so young when we had it.
Best winter vehicle I ever owned was a ’93 AWD Aerostar. Skinny tires would cut through the deep snow. Sold it to a friend and someone turned left in front of them totaling it.
We tried to work on one, there was a 10 inch opening. We gave up
Yes, replacing the spark plugs and doing alignments on these were tough with little room. I had a special tool for the upper control arm nuts to make adjustments to caster/camber with shims. Looking back, I miss those days!
Memories! Pulling the cylinder heads was no fun either.
We still service a 94, with a 3.0 at our garage, owned by a older lady who is mostly a summer resident, drives her dog around and enjoys the Aerostar, we just did considerable work getting it ready for summer,she has a couple late model Volvo’s in the household so it’s by choice, I keep warning her in a year or 2 it’s gonna look like photo 3. It still needs a rack and alignment maybe Chuck could help out !
Worst vehicle I ever owned by far. It rusted away beneath my feet.
Fords of that period had the best upholstery material. Our Bronco II was so much nicer inside than our Cherokee or Grand Caravan.
We went to Los Alamos this November in our van on our month-long trip through New Mexico. What a great location; beautiful in its own right and so close to so many superb places.
I’d wondered if you’d been to my neck of the woods during your trip to New Mexico.
We had a 1990 Aerostar when my first son was born. The Aerostar made it to the Artic Circle and back in 1996. The small share tire sucked in the back country of Canada. We carried a full size tire fir a share, but no wheel for it
The A4LD/4R44E 4 speed automatics in the Aerostar wasn’t really that bad of a transmission. It worked well in the Ranger, but it did have issues in the Aerostar because the catalytic converter was mounted very close to the transmission. Of course heat isn’t good for transmission fluid but heat from the cats on the Aerostar would damage internal transmission seals and cause all kinds of problems. The transmissions usually wouldn’t be worn out, they often just needed seal/gasket jobs. Head gasket problems with the 4.0L were fairly common if the cooling system was poorly maintained. My opinion FWIW is the bore of that engine was a bit too large for the block, and there wasn’t a lot of surface for the head gasket to seal against. Generally wasn’t a problem but if the engine overheated it could be very quickly. I saw a lot of Aerostars burn to the ground due to Ford’s infamous cruise-control brake switch, which was the subject of a big recall.
Overall I thought the Astro/Safari was the toughest mini-van (though it wasn’t really all that ‘mini’) and the Caravan/Voyager was the best designed. The Aerostar sort of split the difference between the two. The Previa didn’t make any sense at all, but some folks sure liked them.
My sister’s family had a 1990 or so Aerostar that went through a couple of transmissions. I attributed it to my BIL’s lead foot and towing a tent trailer in the Rockies.
When these were new I worked with a woman who drove a one in red. As I remember she quite liked it. There was one problem. She was quite short, and she could not reach to clear snow from the windshield. Her solution was a folding 3-step stool that she carried in the back, and a snow brush with a very long handle.
Agreed about your father’s hindsight. I have seen MAYBE one or 2 Aerostars on the road within the past year, but otherwise they’ve gone virtually extinct where I live (South Carolina).
Having owned a ’96 Aerostar and an ’05 Astro, the overall conclusion I can draw from both vehicles is this: They’re VERY nice “Swiss Army Knife” vans when brand-new, but age horribly (the Aerostar especially) as the years add up. It doesn’t help that many of the OEM replacement parts are next to unobtanium either; the support for them ended long ago. It’s suddenly not surprising that so many examples of them have vanished when this fact is considered, although I still see an Astro at least once every month. They were truly GREAT vans when you could still get the parts for them, not so much now.
The ironic thing is that many of the 3-row crossover SUVs we have today are designed with many of the same capabilities that the Aerostar and the Astro/Safari boasted back in their heyday, sans sliding doors. Perhaps Ford & GM were onto something back then after all. 🙂
This was the biggest piece of SHIT anyone ever made. Why don’t you try to get out 5 out of 6 broken off Spark Plugs out of one of these atrocity’s? Thought so, you didn’t have to. Anyone who thinks these pieces of shit are good, never had to work on one.
In 1992 my wife and I and her sister and husband were all looking for a mini van. My brother in law Mike and I looked at the Mazda MPV but neither of us liked it, both looked at the GM Dustbuster vans-a big no from the wives- and then looked at the Astros. I liked the Astro mostly because GM offered a 200hp version of the 4.3 engine. However, Cindy and I couldn’t find an Astro we liked and ended up with a four door S10 Blazer that had been special ordered with the high output 4.3.
Mike and his wife went to Ford and made a deal on a 93 Aerostar. It had the 3.0 engine and was a regular length. Overall they really didn’t have many issues- I think the A/C failed under warranty. But the one problem Ford never could fix was a leaking window behind the driver’s seat. Sadly they divorced and that van was quickly sold.
We replaced our 1986 Sable station wagon with a 1990 Eddie Bauer edition long wheelbase AWD Ford Aerostar which gave us a surprisingly long service life with essentially no mechanical issues until terminal rust forced my son and I to drive the rusting hulk to the salvage yard, surrender the title, and receive $75.00 in return. Except for the rust issues it gave us over 175,000 in its remarkably trouble free service life, also giving us many memorable family trips to the Delaware shore during many summers. Except for the rusting issues, we enjoyed our Aerostar ownership experience.
Personally, I’m intrigued by your mom’s stick-shift Taurus.
Unfortunately, I never saw it. It predated me by about two months, give or take.
In a period of not thinking, I replaced my company E250 Econoline van with a cargo Aerostar as I was tired of the “bigness” in Los Angeles traffic. We were running Commercial HVAC/R service. It was not up to the task even with the 4.0. Brakes every 4 to 6 months, butt dragging. I crane hoisted several Carrier 06E compressors directly into the back of the ‘star to get rebuilt, unloaded with a forklift. If I recall, we dumped them less than a year later in fear of a catastrophic failure.
I guess these were better than the previous Aerostars, I’ve heard nothing but complaints about them .
200,000 miles +/- sans major issues is pretty good in my book .
I remember the snapped off spark plugs, maybe they were installed too tightly by worn out air wrenches in the factory ? .
-Nate