
Throughout his life, my father had bought vehicles he could afford rather than the ones he truly wanted. That changed in the 1990s when he earned a master’s degree in electrical engineering and finally reached a point where a “dream vehicle” was within reach. With a higher salary came the opportunity to replace his basic 1984 GMC Jimmy—a no-frills model he had purchased new and was still rebuilding—with a fully loaded Ford F-350 Power Stroke. On paper, it was everything he could have wanted: big, powerful, capable, and packed with features. Yet what was supposed to be the reward for years of hard work would eventually become the dream truck that never quite felt right.
Our F350 a 4×4, powered by the 7.3-liter Power Stroke Diesel, which has gone on to have quite a following. The Power Stroke diesel only put approximately 215 horsepower down, but it was the 425 ib-ft of torque that mattered. While nominally the Power Stroke was down on power from the 460-equipped trucks, and only about 15 lb-ft of torque up on those trucks, the Power Stroke had a turbocharger, and thus it would make 215 horsepower and 425 lb-ft of torque at high altitude. At 7500 feet above sea level, where we lived, the 460 V8 would lose approximately 22% of its net output, or about 50 horsepower, leaving the 460 decidedly outgunned by the 7.3 Power Stroke. All that power and torque was sent to the wheels by a four-speed automatic transmission.

And it was big. Too big, too thirsty, and too expensive. With its crew cab and extended bed, it was nearly 20 feet long. It was difficult to drive, and my mother learned, at the cost of a rear bumper, that reversing in a truck of that size is no easy task. The cost of diesel went up at about the same time my father bought the F350 and never came back down, eliminating any fuel savings the diesel may have offered. Maintenance was not cheap either. This resulted in the F350 spending most of its time parked, with my father driving smaller, more economical cars to and from work when they were available to him. One such car, a 1986 Suzuki Samurai, he purchased to use as a 4×4, practically defeating the purpose of buying a 4×4 pickup.

I do not get the impression that my father was particularly happy with the F350, even if it was quite an impressive machine. During my father’s period of ownership, the F350 acquired about 14,000 miles on the odometer. Years later, I learned that my father had actually wanted to buy a Dodge Ram with the Cummins diesel, but the dealer he went to had been impolite to him. And so he left and bought a Ford, depriving the Chrysler Corporation of its last opportunity to take money from him (well, second to last, as he would test drive a Jeep Liberty a few years later).
So, the F350 had not been his first choice of truck, and he does not look back on it fondly. However, my siblings and I adored it. My brother loved it because it was a real diesel truck, and it made real diesel sounds. My sister loved it because it was a real truck, and at the time it dwarfed just about all other trucks on the road. I cannot articulate why I loved it, and in hindsight I believe it’s because I had grown up with it. I was about three years old when it came home for the first time, and I recall seeing my father climb out of this behemoth for the first time, and running to see him and the new truck.

The F350 stayed with my father until about 2007, but it did not leave the family. My sister, then a college student moving to Colorado, needed a new car to replace the beater she had been making do with. She asked to buy the F350 and, when my father resisted, she posed an ultimatum; either he sell the truck to her, or she would go buy another one from somebody else. Given her budget, my father had serious concerns about the reliability of any truck my sister might buy and capitulated. He agreed to sell the F350 for what was, even then, a steal.
However, by this time, the F350 was ten years old and had spent much of its life sitting. It needed maintenance my sister could not afford, and the cost of fuel was no less burdensome than it had been on my father. As a result, the F350 served my sister about as frequently as it served my father; more as a yard ornament than as viable transportation. Eventually, my sister came to her senses and listed it for sale, recovering her purchase money and then some from a seller in Arizona. In the years that followed, she retained her taste for “real” trucks, and today she owns a Square Body Chevrolet. As for my father, he did not replace the F350 directly for about a decade, and only did so when he came to need another truck. More on that truck later.
The F350 was meant to be my father’s gift to himself for decades of hard work, and for the right person, it probably would have been quite a reward. However, my father never really took to the F350, and it never really fit our family. Instead, we took to smaller transportation over the years, as you will see in the coming entries.























My next door neighbor still drives (not daily!) a model just like those pictured. He told me it has been totaled out by the insurance company two times! I don’t know when he bought it, but I do know it’s at least a 325,000 mile truck.
Back when these were new, friends who owned a landscaping store ordered one. It was to be a long term truck, but after only 3 years it was gone. When I asked Jeff why, he said little things kept breaking-trim falling off, HVAC issues repeatedly, power windows that would fail-he’d had enough.
It’s really a heart break to finally afford what you’ve wanted only to suffer disappointment.
As the owner of a 1996 F 250 and previous owner of a 94 Powerstroke F450 I’m familiar with these trucks. Their purpose is to haul big heavy loads, either pulling a loaded car trailer, carrying tons of cargo in the bed, etc. If they aren’t being used for these purposes, they’re a waste of effort to drive. I regularly drive a tiny chevy Luv, one of the most practical vehicles of all time. I didn’t notice in this article what kind of heavy loads if any this truck was used to move. I notice today many of these giant trucks at Wal-Mart and rarely see them being used for what they were designed for, to me it’s plain stupid.
I have the same love/hate relationship with an ’18 RAM 2500. For years we ran old trucks because they were cheap and I could fix them. After pulling a trailer for 30 years with a 40 year old K10 it was time to update. The RAM was everything we wanted that no one else did, so we got a real good deal on it. Good news, it’s a beast and can pull/haul any or everything we throw at it, bad news, you can’t reach anything in the bed, can’t get in/out without the running boards I installed, can’t get anything in the cab except 2 people, can’t ride with the windows down because it’s like riding in a helicopter and have to have the defrost and A/C on together to clear the windshield! With 25k miles the A/C has been fixed once, the ABS twice. With all that being said it’s still better than anything new being offered so I guess I’m stuck with it till I die or quit pulling a trailer!
1997 was the last year for the “areonose” body, but the underpinnings dated back to 1980. Length, my 1986 F350 crew cab dual rear wheel pickup is 22 feet overall lehgth, I know it is nearly 7 feet high to the cab roof. Manuverability, you didn’t say 2 or 4 wheel drive, but, the truck pictured appears to be a 4WD which has limits on how far the front wheels will turn before destroying the universal joints in the front axle.
Mine weighs in at 6400lbs empty weight, almost no fuel in either tank and no one in the truck. I have owned it for 32 years this past April, and the truck has been updated to the latest EFI system Ford used on the 460 engine and has the E4OD transmission in place of the C6. My advantage over the one your family had, mine is “non-catalyst” and as such has a much more open exhaust. I have hauled literally “a ton of bricks”, didn’t even bring the factory installed assist springs into contact with the frame pads. I used the truck for it’s primary purchase purpose, hauling our 10,000 gross weight 5th wheel travel trailer.
Theirs was non-catalyst too, being a diesel.
My neighbor, who was a house mover (he moved my houses), bought a white one just like this. Big, noisy and unlike your father’s truck, this was of course the main work truck for his outfit. It got lots of use and abuse, and I could hear it coming a couple of blocks away.
These older direct injection pickup diesels (Cummins, Powerstroke) were painfully noisy for me, due to my damaged ears. It has been a relief with the introduction of the more modern injection systems that make them significantly less noisy, unless of course they’ve been modified.
Yes, big HD dual cab trucks are obviously a huge magnet for a lot of Americans, and while many do get used appropriately, undoubtedly many don’t, like your father’s.
Worst thing you can do is use a diesel truck as a daily driver. Diesels hate frequent short trips. Yet many people continue to do so, worst part is the owners abusing their truck without even realizing they are abusing it. It’s not the trucks fault you have a tiny pecker.
Worst thing you can do is use a diesel truck as a daily driver. Diesels hate frequent short trips.
I can’t begin to imagine why. Back in the carb days, gas engines suffered exceptional wear from lots of cold starts, but that specifically was not the case with diesels as their fuel also had lubricating qualities.
Could you give an explanation for that statement?
Googling ‘diesel short distances’ led me to this (granted, it’s about modern diesels):
https://goldfarbinc.com/blogs/news/the-effect-of-short-trips-on-diesel-engine-wear
In general Diesel take longer to reach their Optimum operating temperature. This leads to excess engine wear, and increase pollution. When I looked into buying a diesel truck I spoke to a friend of mine who was a diesel mechanic and he said for my use which was short trips around town making deliveries and Pickups. I was better off with a gas engine instead of a diesel for those reasons. I would have to leave the diesel sit and idle to keep it at operating temperature which isn’t good for it either or I could shut the gas engine off and just start it up again. With the price of diesel exceeding that of gasoline, it’s no longer a fuel economy issue. When I was working at a gas station back in the early 70s I remember regular was 27.9 premiums 29.9 and Diesel is 15.9. I don’t know why diesel became more expensive than gasoline.
The price delta is at least partially economic; US oil crudes tend to be light/sweet or intermediate (famously West Texas…).
You need to blend in imported crudes (Middle Eastern) in order to crack off Diesel grades efficiently.
“Back in the carb days, gas engines suffered exceptional wear from lots of cold starts, but that specifically was not the case with diesels as their fuel also had lubricating qualities.”
This is false. Diesel fuel will readily dilute engine lube oil. Diesel locomotive and heavy equipment engines use sensors to detect lube oil fuel contamination/dilution.
Thank you all for this information. I had not considered these various factors. I’ve learned something new today, which is a goal for me for every day.
Paul, you have had more than one house moved? There MUST be a story there!
There is, and it’s all right here:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/auto-biography/auto-biography-moving-on-to-moving-houses/
I purchased a new ’94 F250 4×4 super can with the long bed and a ZF5 transmission. The super low 1st gear made pulling trailers and crawling off-road easy. What wasn’t easy was using it as a daily driver in stop and go freeway commuting. My wife and I loved that truck because we could pack the cab with four of our friends and go to the club and not worry about them driving home intoxicated. Heck, if he were worried someone was going to puke on the way home, we zipped up their jacket and had them sleep it off in the 8′ bed. I finally sold it, regrettably, after the third clutch slave cylinder crapped out and my shifting knee started developing arthritis. I wish I still had it, but with an E4OD conversion.
A buddy of mine has a truck like this. He bought it when he used to tow a big camping trailer and a boat. The boat went over the truck bed in some manner. He later went to a bigger boat that he kept in a storage yard, and then sold the trailer for a motor home. Now he occasionally only carries a couple of quads in the bed. He keeps the truck because it was a big investment, and replacing it with another at some point would be even more expensive. However he knows that big diesels like these are in demand for buyers that have a real need for them.
I’m like most guys, I like big trucks, they are cool, with lots of presence, and they tickle that “Tonka” nerve that I’ve maintained since childhood. But I realize that I don’t need anything that big to use everyday. I’m happy with my plain old F150, though I saw an immaculate Lincoln Blackwood for sale on CL at a good price last month. I was tempted, but this is an example of a truck that is impractical because of it’s use restrictions, not because it has too much excess capability.
Just think, if the writer’s Dad had bought a loaded up F150 crew or Super cab, he might have been very happy with his choice. Provided that it handled his needs.
I’ve always gravitated to smaller vehicles despite my tall frame. They’re easier to drive and usually cost less to buy. Last year my Maverick was getting some body work done and my loaner was a new F150. I felt so uncomfortable driving it in our horrific traffic that I brought it back to the dealer and begged for something smaller. They obliged me with a Plug-in Escape, which was actually quite impressive.
I’m in Texas, so ground zero for your truck is to impress the neighbors and yourself. I don’t understand the mentality of driving those behemoths around as a commuter vehicle unless they are serving their hauling/ towing intentions, but I’m not paying for them either. Just seems such a waste.
My brother in law is a farmer and had more than one of those, though almost always the F-250, and bought used. They always gave him good service, mostly pulling wagons/trailers or taking 50 mile trips to the nearest decent sized city.
It’s ironic when people buy more truck than they have use for, then they complain about the fuel costs. Happens here too.
Interesting, in the UK the big US pickups are a fairly unusual sight, I suppose Ford Rangers are the most common and those are big compared to most cars. I admit I admire the ones I see and get thinking ‘ what if ..’
Reality is, their too big for what I need, I do tow trailers and a caravan though.
Obviously I don’t know how much emission nonsense is fitted to the engines there but here, a fast drive regularly is needed to stop a diesel from choking up, worst thing is those exhaust recirculation valves which get stuck up leading to limp mode.
I owned a ‘99.5 F-250 Powerstroke at the farm for about four years. Single cab, long bed, so a bit easier to maneuver, and was also the first year for the intercooled 7.3. Was an absolute ‘hoss’ of a truck, but only got around 14mpg, barely better than the 12 or so my former ’69 F-100 (240 six) got.
The truck had around 175K on it when I purchased, and while I never had any drivetrain problems, the electrics were wonky – radio often wouldn’t work, and the heat/air only blew through the defrost vents, despite multiple checks on vacuum hoses.
I finally decided to sell it to a guy I knew who was looking for a plow truck, having realized my Dad’s dementia was going to require several 16-hour one-way trips to get him moved into a care facility and then clean out and sell his house. I bought my first new truck at that point, a ’15 RAM 2500 5.7. Same fuel economy as the diesel, but much more comfortable and no fear of an engine issue costing $4K to repair.
A beautiful truck as long as someone else drives and feeds it =8-) .
One of my brothers bought the crew cab version, IIRC he said the ‘powerstroke’ Diesel engine was sourced from IHC (?) .
Indeed it was a best to drive and he lived in New England, home to narrow and twisty roads .
He complained endlessly about it but never could say why and he kept it for years and years .
His hobby was buying old raggedy houses and rebuilding them from the ground up and upgrading the electrics, water, sewer, HVAC and windows etc. yet I think he could have used a normal gasoline powered truck to the same end .
I’m one of those who was introduced to trucks as work tools so I too prefer _just_ the amount of truck I actually need, this is pretty small .
I imagine a beast like this would make a fine mid – West farm / work rig .
-Nate