Oh look, a first year Colonnade coupe! From 1973 to 1977, the Oldsmobile A-Bodies became the dominant nameplate among the B-O-P intermediates, so you might think the 1973 Pontiac line came in third behind Olds. However, as of ’73 Oldsmobile had not yet gained total domination, and this green coupe (along with its brother the Grand Prix) came in second among GM intermediates, behind the Chevelle/Monte Carlo juggernaut.
Colonnade coupes remain a polarizing design. Many dislike the thick roof pillars and fixed rear windows, and despite being the largest intermediate GM ever produced, interior space does not reflect the exterior dimensions. Personally, I prefer the standard coupe to other colonnade body styles, and while I believe the styling declined from year to year, I find the early versions fresh and interesting. In my opinon, each successive year of the colonnades looked increasingly generic, but in 1973 the full range- Chevy, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, and Buick, all provided cars with strong individual character.
Looking at this view, I hope you agree. The stance of the car, the body lines, and the large single headlights all worked together to form a pleasing aspect. In addition, GM had yet to incorporate their sillier seventies styling elements (do NOT get me started on stacked square headlights!). On this car, there’s no gingerbread trim or vinyl top to distract, and I find the overall look quite pleasing.
The rear of the car also provides a distinctive look. The fenders and trunk draw together to form a horizontal crease across the back, and the designers mounted the tail lights on a sloping panel above the bumper. This one element keeps me from loving the ’73 coupe, but Pontiac made up for it the next year with new taillights mounted outboard of the trunk, and wrapped over the top of the rear fenders. If I ever decided to acquire one of these colonnade Ponchos, I’d try to find a ’74 coupe, and then replace the front grille with a header panel off a ’73 (or a Grand Am Enduro nose).
The exterior lacks any trim level designation, but the overall appearance indicates a lightly trimmed base model, rather than a full-boat deluxe package. The wheel covers are a step up from dog dish hub caps, but they deliver the only exterior bright work.
A view inside reinforces this impression. Between the manual window crank, vinyl upholstery and bench seat, I’m thinking base model. A close look at the door panel confirms my suspicions.
The trim plate just says “LeMans.” In 1973, Pontiac offered their standard A bodies as the LeMans, LeMans Sport Coupe, Luxury LeMans, Grand Am and GTO (or should Grand Am come after the GTO?). Therefore, this green coupe is indeed the least of the Pontiac clan. If you’re interested, Mike Burns covered a top of the line LeMans trim level in his article on a 1977 Grand LeMans.
I said at the beginning of the article that the Pontiac intermediate line finished second among the GM nameplates in 1973. However, this was the only strong year for the LeMans, and the Grand Prix could not win the sales race by itself. LeMans sales slipped from 233,989 in ’73 to 148,254 in 1974. A year later, LeMans sales bottomed out at 48,589 (to be fair, 1975 was a bad year for all, but still!), and LeMans sales would not exceed 70k until the new model arrived in 1978. Among its brethren, Pontiac intermediates fell to dead last among the four GM brands in ’75 and ‘76, and only because of resurgant Grand Prix sales, came back to barely beat Buick for third in 1977.
This chart shows the steep decline of the LeMans nameplate, and also shows the strong rise of the Grand Prix in ’76 and ’77. Keep in mind, LeMans sales includes coupes, wagons and four doors, making the meteoric rise of the two door Grand Prix even more impressive. Why LeMans sales dropped so strongly when other colonnades built momentum is a question I can’t answer. Perhaps someone more familiar with 1970’s market forces can provide an explanation.
So we bid farewell to our 1973 LeMans coupe. If it came from an earlier era, people would line up to grab this clean, rust free coupe and turn it into a muscle car clone. In fact, if it were older, I’d have mentioned how unusual it is to see such a basic model still plying the roads, a car still sporting wheel covers instead of styled steel wheels. But since it’s a just 1973 LeMans, it’s just an old colonnade coupe, and there’s reason to make it a clone (even though we could make it a GTO!). Instead, our (not so) little coupe rests quietly on a California curb, a rare representative of the pinnacle year for the Pontiac colonnades.
Surely that sloping tail reduced trunk space, which wasn’t really small on the Chevelle, but it was awkwardly-shaped enough without the lower deck lid.
It did, and I recall the redesigned, somewhat squared-off rear styling of the ’74 raised the trunk lid some and increased its size.
Overall I liked the appearance of this one GM product the most. The federal bumpers like most of the vehicles of this era killed the aesthetics for me.
A remarkable amount of decadence, and flamboyance, in their exterior design. Whether in coupe, sedan, or wagon bodystyle. I did appreciate at the time. This nose design, did integrate well with the body sides.
CC effect: I passed a maroon one of these driving in the other lane this morning. A quick glance suggested an older driver who may have owned the car since the ’70s.
The rear view gives me a slight bustle-back vibe. Somehow.
After the PLCs, for a round headlight colonnade, it’s Buick all the way.
For the rectangular headlight colonnades, it’s a Grand Prix or Cutlass.
I’d still rank the rectangular light non-PLC Pontiac Colonnades above Buick and Malibu. It’s behind Cutlass but only just.
A body enthusiasts go crazy for the pre 73 models. But the 73-77 A bodies have a vastly better chassis, steering, axles, along with the better handling. The critics don’t like the smog engines, but all of that can be updated. Rear wheel drive, and any GM engine will bolt in no sweat.
Yup, an intake, dual exhaust and a cam would wake up any A body quite nicely. In today’s money it was like $1000.
I often wonder how much of the “pre-74 only” mantra was influenced through the decades by gearhead magazines (hot rod et al) predominantly based in southern California which up until now(pending imminent change as I’ve heard) basically left pre 1975s a free for all in terms of modifications where 75 and newer had to strictly comply with draconian emissions standards retaining utterly terrible factory emissions systems and tune.
The absolute hardest part to remedy to 70s era malaisemobiles is getting the compression back up to the usual 9-10:1ish or more levels of the golden era(and present) via pistons or heads, otherwise there’s just as much potential in 70s iron as there is in 60s iron. And like you mentioned the more serious focus on handling made these better than a lot of their predecessors of similar weight/dimensions.
Call me a contrarian but if a rebuilt engine to better specs or engine swap is all it takes to have a fun and cool looking old pseudo muscle car I have a hard time finding the extra premium in desirability of a more desirable 72 Lemans over a 73. Neither look remotely like anything made in the last 20-30 years, so where’s the unique appeal to anything earlier if its not a genuine GTO Judge or otherwise?
I bought a 75 Gran LeMans 4 Dr new. Always liked the style of it, but was a mechanical nuisance. Lots of troubles with the in tank fuel pump and vacuum system. Delco sound system never worked right. Poor dealer support too. Finally junked it at approx 120000 miles. And yes, the trunk was way too small and unusuable.
This was my first car and I still miss it.
I liked the “Pontiac”, variation. (tudor/fordor, versions both). Was quite emamored of the ’75’s”. Evidently, going by the figures, I was rather in an exclusive group.
The trunks in these cars were so bad that when used as a taxi it was impossible to carry a spare tire!
Here’s where I agree; I think the colonnade bodystyle as a styling exercise was a success, it got rid of the hardtop bodystyles in favor of pillars in the most stylistically compelling means possible… (Even to this day most modern mainstream production cars rely on blacked out pillars to fake true hardtop greenhouses)… and the results on both coupe sedan and wagon mostly worked well enough.
I do not agree in the front end department, however. These look like to me a castoff of the 70 Firebird stylists and against the endura nosed Grand Am are just plain dumpy. GMs fixation on single headlights on the intermediates I cannot tell whether was Bill Mitchell being nostalgic towards 20s-30s Car design or accountants being favorable of only equipping 2 headlights instead of 4, but Pontiac I personally feel uniquely suffers for it… (buick and olds pull it off well, Chevy lowered expectations in 71 but Pontiac? eh…) I think the Pontiac was the only collonade that improved as years progressed, from its taller trunklid in 74 to its quad rectangular headlights in 76. I appreciate the purity of 73s but they really just dont work fr me unless they’re in Grand Am form, I don’t make that sort of distinction with prior GM A bodies, I find Lemans or GTOs from 66-72 mostly equally attractive
The reskinned, handsome but blandified ’76-7 Cutlass Supreme and Regal coupes sold extremely well, as did the MC and GP. The silly stacked headlights didn’t stop the MC from rising from 250k in ’75 to 350k and 410k in ’76-7. The regular coupes, sedans, and wagons were seldom seen those years, maybe why they took the risk with the Aerobacks in ’78-9.
As seems to be the case in all 1970’s GM products with a column shifter, the rubber cover on the end of the shift handle is missing. The column on this car appears to be a Chevrolet style tilt column. The rubber end cover must have been very flimsy to begin with. The somewhat smaller and matching cover on the end of the turn signal stalk usually held up much better. IIRC it seems to me that Oldsmobile used a different shaped handle and end on their column shifts in the ’70’s. Agree? Disagree?
I was with my parents looking at a Century sedan at a dealer in New Orleans in 1973 and the salesman admitted the colonnades were moving slowly and said he was selling Chevys in 1957 and they were slow sellers at first but look how popular they became after people got used to the styling.
This is a good looking car but I’d stick with the narrow stripe white wall tires. More appropriate for this non-GTO model Lemans back then.