Having paid my penance, at seventeen I finally joined the ranks of legally sanctioned drivers. I could have taught the drivers-ed class by then, including certain advanced techniques well outside the usual curriculum. Speaking of which, as part of this rite of passage, I finally retired the implements I’d used for hot-wiring the family Dodges. It then occurred to me: why not get a job where I could indulge my love of driving and actually get paid for the pleasure?
I decided that the place to get paid to drive new cars must be at a car dealer. So I walked down to York Road, where the Chevy and Ford stores were. Since I was a Chevy man, I turned left, towards Towson Ford. I figured here was my chance to act out my anti-Ford bias. I walked in the door, and bingo; I was suddenly what’s known in the biz as a “car jockey.” My daily after-school job: shuttle the dealer’s cars to and from various storage lots, to the body shop, and back to mother showroom as well as the occasional new car delivery. The scope for unauthorized but paid amusement was only limited by the scope of my imagination and what very little self-restraint a seventeen year-old hoon has.
My first and overarching rule when ferrying brand new Fords was to religiously adhere to the factory’s engine break-in guidelines. Well, only one part, actually. I took Ford’s admonishment to “avoid driving at a steady speed” straight to heart.
In my defense, throttle stomping and brake mashing served an important quality control function. Factory fresh or no, Ford’s “Total Performance” 1971 models rarely ran properly off the truck. Remember: these were the UAW and Detroit’s “glory years.” If the manufacturer could get a vehicle on a transporter, it was good enough for rock and roll.
In fact, the dealer employed a full-time mechanic in the new car prep department (of which I was a member) to tune-up and carefully look over every car before delivery. Yes, a complete tune-up (ignition timing, carb adjustment, etc.) on every brand new car! Now that was a revelation. No wonder one literally had to mash throttles to get them from the truck (oddly, the drop off point was a couple of miles away) to the assigned storage lot.
Fortunately all too often, brand new cars needed a visit to the body shop. Lucky for me, the body shop was miles away, and the route included a tightly-winding road along Jones Falls. But my adrenal adventures were all-too-often thwarted by that notorious Ford side-wall shredding understeer. Plowing LTDs through the tight curves was like shooting pool with a 2 x 4. (’71 Ford CC here).
But there was a mustang Mach 1 HO to be dealt with. It was a 1970, and had been the owner’s son, who got a new one every fall. I knew of its abused existence, and when it came time for it to be “traded in” for a new 1971 Mach 1, the rather shop-worn “demonstrator” needed to be taken to the body shop for a “refreshing”. I took a few long-cuts on that drive, and it was a memorable one indeed; my first time behind the wheel of a performance car.
It was a four-speed, and the motor was well broken-in. Knowing how it had been treated assuaged my guilt a wee bit by my explorations of its various capabilities and vices. I almost ended in the ditch at least once. Yes, the throttle can help steer a powerful car like the Mach 1, but I learned it takes a bit of finesse to make that happen in the right direction.
A few weeks later when I showed up for work, the red Mach 1 was back in the prep bay. I understood it had been sold. A big electric motor was humming away, with a cable attached to it on one end and the other end snaking up under the dashboard. My boss explained that the Mustang’s new owner became suspicious about his new “demonstrator” when he discovered numerous signs of wear and abuse, despite the negligible mileage on the odometer. He decided to do a little due diligence, and found that the odometer had been rolled way back. Now the electric motor was running in the reverse direction it usually ran in, replacing the many missing thousands of miles.
Surprisingly, a bare-bones Pinto could be very entertaining in the curves, as long as it was equipped the right way. The early Pinto underpinnings were heavily based on the a European Ford Cortina, with a goofy body on top. The German 2.0-liter engine pulled, the English four-speed was slick and the rack and pinion steering was tight. It was light, squirtable and tossable– as long as the road was smooth. Smog controls, five mph bumpers, slush-boxes and dead power steering quickly turned the Pinto into another mid-70’s joke.
The Maverick– that recycled old Falcon disguised in bell-bottoms– now that was the punchline. With its feeble six and slush-box, throttle stomping was a given. Taking delivery of a plain-Jane coupe from the transporter, I got in and as usual, floored it. One of the skinny little tires went up in a cloud of smoke. Whoa!
A look under the hood revealed a surprise: a 302 V8. Even I, the supreme auto know-it-all, was caught off guard; the V8 option hadn’t actually been announced yet in the magazines. It took me totally by surprise; I thought maybe it was just an assembly-line mistake. Oddly, it didn’t sell, and sat around for months. I took it on myself to keep it exercised.
On slow days I burned time (and tires) pulling doughnuts in a distant parking lot. Ironically, an old lady eventually bought it, oblivious to the chewed-up rear tires. Or maybe she didn’t care.
That summer, I worked as a car jockey in the service department. My oddest encounter was a customer’s plushed-out ’69 LTD sedan. It had the optional 390 V8, but a three-on-the-tree column-shift(!), and manual steering(!!) and un-assisted drum brakes (!!!) . I thought for sure he was in for a new power steering pump. The burly owner obviously wasn’t thinking about resale value when he custom-ordered it.
(Update: I always assumed he must have put in a special order for it. Turns out that for 1969, Ford de-contented the LTD, and the automatic and power steering were optional. The proof is in these snips from the ’69 brochure. But he still must have ordered it, since no dealer would ever have taken delivery of one).
A metallic-brown ‘70 LTD two-door hardtop was my summer ride, though not exactly through legitimate means. The service department kept a couple of loaners. I pocketed the key before I left work, grabbed a Coke next door and came back for it after everyone was gone.
I unhooked the speedometer cable (I was an expert by then), and took it home for the night or the weekend. My boss was always happy to see me at work in the morning, before he or anyone else arrived. He knew a highly motivated employee when he saw one.
I spent that summer cruising around and hunting skinny-dipping swimming holes with three girls from my neighborhood. All four of us always sat up front, across that wide front bench seat. Ford’s designers must have had us in mind when they made the LTD so broad.
Summer fun gave way to winter bleakness. I still worked at the Ford dealer after school. The problem was that I didn’t go to school very often. Baltimore had (finally) cultivated a hip street scene that was much more compelling than algebra. I spent fewer days at school than hanging out down on Read Street or at the Pratt library reading endless Popular Mechanix from the 1940s. .
I wasn’t going to graduate that spring anyway, so one February morning shortly after my eighteenth birthday, I walked down to Towson Ford, picked up my paycheck, put on my backpack, walked out to the Beltway and hitchhiked west– without a proper goodbye to anyone. Not a shining moment.
I even briefly entertained the thought of grabbing some keys to my pick of the back lot. What would that have been had I acted on it? A new Econoline van with the six and three-speed manual, of course.
I had no particular destination; just to get away. Like lots of kids then, I was California dreamin’ on a winter’s day.
















My adolescence sure was boring.
Call me a total nerd, but out of all the poser Falcons (Mustang, Maverick, Granada) My favorite would be a lightly optioned 302 equipped Maverick Sedan (71 or 72). I always loved the “groovy” bodywork and always thought they looked lighter and jauntier than a comparable Nova. Although the Nova probably handled better and felt more solid. It looks more carefree. And there’s still an equal number of those to early 70s Novas and Valiants plying Berkeley streets, so they couldn’t have been the most atrocious cars of the era.
I always liked the Maverick Grabber. They got the Mustangs high impact colors and a couple of hood scoops. Made a nice package. It actually looked a lot like a scaled down Mustang.
We got Vals here great old cars especially when the hemi6 was introduced those haul arse but rust pretty quik I had a 265 cube regal with 302 Ford carb and tow pack heavy duty suspesion and 727 trans with a 15ft caravan you only knew it was there coz of the extra fuel stops. Your education sounds like mine Paul it went better away from school aso leaving wasnt a biggie.
A 69 LTD with a 390 and a column 3 speed: I want that car!
As for the Mavericks, I liked them well enough. But I never understood why Ford made it without a glovebox. Was it cost cutting or trying to be european like the Cortina?
It’s a good thing you have your 71 Ford memories because most of them reverted to ore years ago.
The decontenting of the LTD started in 1968, with reversion to 3-on-the-tree and a downgrading of the interior trim. Power steering was never standard until 1972, when it was on all big Fords regardless of series, along with automatic. Power Disc brakes,did however, become an LTD standard in 1970.
These 3-on-the-tree LTDs do turn up from time to time, once in an early 90s Hemmings
I had and another on E-Bay a few years ago. I just shake my head every time I hear of it.
Driving techniques while in my 20′s seem similar to yours.
I recall renting cars on sales trips and keeping my right foot firmly planted when not braking. Also to find empty lots, preferably with a few puddles, to do doughnuts…ahh youth.
With regard to the Maverick’s, a friend had one and she wouldn’t use the air conditioner because all the power would be robbed from the engine; probably the 6.
(I am reluctant to even mention this but I respectfully request you leave the UAW sniping to Jr. and associates over at TTAC, who seem more interested in increasing page views rather than discussing cars.)
It’s not sniping. I don’t think anyone can deny that the management-labor atmosphere, and quality control were at a low point then, right? I have no desire for finger-pointing, but things were what they were, and not always so good at that time.
I remember my dad talking about the day he bought his 71 Mach 1. Thirty miles from the dealership the thing died. The distributor was never snugged all the way. He had a few horror stories about that car.
Apparently Ford’s Total Performance only applied if you were travelling in a straight line.
I was an apprentice at a Lincoln/Mercury body shop back in the early 90s. They were a bit more tight fisted with the keys at that time and the cars were even less exciting but we still found ways to have fun.
Brought back some good memories!
Ah, Paul…you were fortunate in being able to make so much out of your “wasted youth.”
I, too, engaged in the waste…but I landed butter-side down. If it sounds like envy and sour grapes, that’s only because it is…
To your cars, though. I’m that rarity that occasionally pops up: A Pinto fancier. Now, I agree with your assessment that once the emissions and bumpers and marketing people were finished with it, the final Pinto was a nose-heavy, dead-steering, styling-clash mess. But in original inception, with the Cologne four and a manual box, and styling that, if not practical, was in fact damned attractive for the time (and looks good even now)…it was quite the package for an entry-level car.
The manual steering, before that chromed railroad tie got bolted to the front…was moderate in effort, tight and quick. The four-speed gearbox had, when new and if cared for over the car’s life…tight, neatly-snicking throws. The brakes took high effort – but sitting on the floor, the driver was in perfect position to stomp on them.
The engine…depended on which you got. I favored the 2.0…had two of them. Had another Pinto with the Lima 2.3; and everything right with the Cologne engine was wrong with the Lima. Never drove the V6 or the Kent engine…my guess is, too heavy and too small respectively.
But give a little respect where respect is due. Compared to the bland, corporate, corners-cut Vega, the Pinto had character…and at least it didn’t rust as fast as its competitors.
For a Ford, that’s really saying something.
My (Pinto) sentiments exactly. Have you checked out our Pinto CC?
Actually, I’m just now checking it out.
The Web’s a great thing when ya want to waste time in great chunks…
(j/k)
My sentiments too, my first new car was a ’72. I wanted a Corolla SR-5, but my WW II vet dad was paying half and made me Buy American. I liked that Cologne engine, 4-speed and quick handling. I think it’s good looking too. Trouble is, the whole damned car was put together with sheet metal screws. Rust holes showed up as soon as it was paid for.
I had a similar job back in the early 80′s at a combination Ford/AMC dealer. I worked in Parts and Service and had to shuttle cars to and from the service and wash bays. I did some PDI’s and light mechanical work when we were slow. But at that time, we were in the high malaise era, only the occasional older car from the 60′s or early 70′s had any kind of balls. And since we were a small outfit and fairly self-contained, it was hard to pull off much hooning. I remember getting into a 1979 Mustang with the 302 V8, dropping it into 1st gear and stomping on the gas, only to hear the whole exhaust system ‘honk’ (more like wheeze) and got the right rear tire to spin about twice. The turbo Mustangs were a bit more fun to drive, but hard to do burn outs with because it was tough to judge when you’d come on to boost; even then you got two or three spins of the tires.
But by the the time the next semester started, I had gotten a job loading trucks, the union wages I was making then far outpaced the often boring and dirty job of working the parts and service department. I made enough to dump my 1969 Torino for a nice (leftover) 1980 Mercury Capri RS Turbo
Anyone remember the televison commerical in ’72 where Ford pitted an LTD Brougham against a Jaguar XJ6? They were comapring features. This campagin was not as bold as the mid-70′s comparo between a Ford Granada and a Mercedes.
I do remember “piloting” (more like in the literal nautical sense) my Aunt’s ’74 LTD Country Squire wagon round about the mid-70s when I got my driver’s license. I do remember the 400 2-bbl did have some decent launch (the torque), but other than that, the dull for the time Ford power steering was only fractionally better than the car she eventually traded the Country Squire for – a ’78 Plymouth Fury wagon.
The first pic in this installment made me dig out my Gone in 60 dvd. That’s the type of car flick you’ll never see again.