The evolution of automotive design doesn’t really have that many clearly defined mileposts, especially those with the word “revolutionary” etched into them. It’s a river of constant evolution, borrowing, and incrementalism. But there are a few, and Battista “Pinin” Farina is credited with at least two of them, likely a record. The first is his 1946 Cisitalia 202GT coupe, which synthesized an organic “molded lump of clay” style that was profoundly influential. And who else but Pinin to take the next step; to create folds, creases and angles and forever break the “pontoon” school of design that the Cisitalia ushered in and so dominated the fifties. His Florida I (1955) and Florida II (1956, above) are the progenitors of a new angular wave, and Pinifarina quickly spread its design language across a huge number of cars, including the Peugeot 404.
The black coupe at the top is the Florida II (1957) and the prototype of the coach-built Lancia Flamina Coupe built in small numbers. I put it at the top for its more obvious similarities with the 404 and other related production cars. But the Florida I of 1955-1956 (above) was true groundbreaker in this new direction, but really good shots of it are hard to find.
Here’s one of the rear, which is really the more distinctive end of the Floridas, as the front grille is anything but new, a development of the oval that had already grace the 1946 Cisitalia, countless Pininfarina-designed Ferraris, and plenty of American cars like the 1955 Chevy.
Let’s also take a look at the tail of one of the production Lancia Flamina Coupes. The distinctive rear window inset, and the graceful extension of the C-pillar to the rear lights is almost perfectly replicated in the Peugeot 404 sedan.
To appreciate the significance of the Florida’s new roof line, inset rear window, and the very deliberate break of the upper body with the lower one, we’ll have to take a look at some examples of pre-Florida designs, starting with the influential Cisitalia, above.
The Peugeot 403 (1955) is a perfect example of the “pontoon” or “envelope” style that utterly predominated the late forties and early fifties, influenced by the Cisitalia. In the case of the 403, it was Pininfarina’s own design, one of the last before the Florida.
Countless American cars starting with the new 1949 post-war models also espoused this design direction, the 1949 Ford being a particularly good example.
But with the Florida, the smooth mold was broken, and in Europe certainly, it set off a revolution. American designers were undoubtedly influenced too, if not in quite such a blatant fashion, and quite so quickly.
Well, the 1963 Pontiac Grand Prix and Buick Riviera certainly border on the edge of being blatant. Bill Mitchell’s dramatic shift away from Harley Earl’s rounded themes of the fifties to the sharp-edged look of the sixties owes a generous tip of his fedora to the Florida. Even the GP’s delicate but unmistakable mid-line body crease is taken straight off the Florida’s flanks. It’s so subtle that it hardly shows up in some of the Florida pictures, but it was a crucial element in breaking up that older slab-side look.
The 1966 GM Intermediate coupes, like this Chevelle Malibu, takes the Florida’s inset rear window even further.
Studebaker’s 1962 Gran Turismo Hawk would have a hard time denying it was not designed under the influence. And we an take this game even further back and speculate:
The 1958 Thunderbird was the first American car to sport Ford’s soon widely adopted wide and flat C-pillar and deeply-inset rear window, both hallmarks of the 1955 Florida. You be the judge. (Update: the ’57 retractable hardtop Ford Skyliner had it first)
We can argue about the Florida’s influence in the US; in Europe, there was no argument. After being a fairly small design and coachbuilder, the Florida vaulted Farina into the big time, including having the Italian government decree a change in his last name to Pininfarina, incorporating his nickname with his family name. And large European manufacturers came knocking with money in hand eager to sign design contracts. One of the biggest was with BMC, and their 1958 lineup of their mid-sized 1.5 liter sedans were the first of many to bear the Pininfarina stamp.
One year later, Pininfarina’s 1959 Fiat 1800 appeared, showing the Florida’s influence less diluted than in the rather fussy and finny BMC saloons, and predicting the Peugeot 404 quite accurately.
Especially so from the rear. One hopes Peugeot got a volume discount for their 404 contract.
A very influential car with its tailgate-hatchback was the 1958 Austin A40 Farina, named after its designer. Predicting quite successfully the VW Golf and its ilk, A40 was built on a more pedestrian RWD platform.
The Peugeot 404′s rear window and the way the C-pillar blends into the line ending with the rear fin was much more true to the Florida than any of the other Pininfarina production designs, and is its most distinctive feature.
BMC’s Austin and Morris 1100 models of 1962 took the original Mini’s space efficient FWD layout to a slightly larger level, and Pininfarina adapted the Florida design language to a whole new smaller and modern level. A very progressive and influential design, also built in MG and other BMC brand versions, it was sold here finally as the ill-fated Austin America.
Before we leave the pedestrian Florida-influenced Pininfarinas, let’s pay homage to the brilliant Ferraris that Pininfarina designed during the Florida era, such as this 250 GT from 1958. Its front end is dripping with the Florida I, even though the actual execution with the headlights is different.
The Ferrari’s superb hind quarters speak it just as much, although the rear window lacks the distinctive inset of the Florida’s.
Looking outside of Pininfarina’s own work, one can see the Florida’s influence in a raft of imitators, starting the most modest and smoky two-stroke Trabant, from the former East Germany.
Or head across the globe, to Japan, to ponder the 1965 Nissan President. We could find a slew of cars from this era bearing the Florida’s wide-spread genes; but what about more recent designs?
The handsome Fiat 130 Coupe of 1971 was a Pininfarina design, but not by Pinin himself, whose last personal, and lasting effort was the Florida. It updates many of the basic Florida elements fifteen years on.
Perhaps the most faithful Florida re-enactment came in 1975, with Pininfarina’s Rolls-Royce Camargue. It just goes to show how enduring a truly timeless design can be. Not bad for, for twenty years on.
The game of Florida-hunting could go on all night, but let’s put it to bed with another Nissan design, the more recent Infiniti Q45 (Y33). Call it a stretch, if you like, but that timeless C-pillar originated somewhere…on the 1956 Florida.






























Something about the Nissan President says 1964 Rambler/AMC Ambassador to me. Which strikes me as odd of all cars for Nissan to interpret, given that those AMC cars are a weird diluted styling interpretation of the subject design here.
And the 1963-64 Olds Starfire’s got in on a good rakish interpretation of this look too, perhaps with a bit too much chrome.
As said, and as I understand, the most influental part was the long crease that divided the car lengthwise from front to end, an early form of “flame surfacing”. Farina must’ve studied how the light falls on the car, and the interesting play between light and shadow, to get the effect of longer, lower, wider. It’s visible on one of the pictures.
Another interesting detail is that there were several different Flordia concept cars, one with hidden suicide doors for the back seat passengers. The doors are hidden, and have concealed door openers, à la Alfa Romeo 156. As I understand it, Farina liked the car so much he made it his personal car. And that car was also the inspiration for the Flaminia Coupe.
You see, in true Italian fashion, none of the Flaminia cars had any sheetmetal in common between them. Though they looked alike, there were subtle differences. The Coupe had front wings that ended up in a smooth round line to frame the headlights, were the sedan had a sort of oblong shape with a pointy head. That discretely pointy headlight frame is lifted directly to the 404, as seen in the pictures for that article.
Thank you for the additional commentary; it was getting late last night. I had that same picture of the Flamina coupe rear end, and forgot to include it, but have now, along with a ’66 Chevelle that took the sail panel extensions even further.
This is the best page I’ve been able to find so far on the Flaminia cars, several pages in are a really good picture on the Florida II concept car, and it’s very dramatic rear end. I think this article explains somehow Lancias extremely eccentric wasy of doing business by not having anything in common between the mostly handbuilt cars.
http://www.ritzsite.nl/Lancia/14_LanciaCC.htm
Where do you find girls like that driving Trabants??
She was kind enough to go out and fire it up for her grossmutter….
Is it any wonder that I love pillarless hardtops and go on and on about them? They are the most beautiful auto designs (in my opinionated opinion) ever! A well-executed sedan isn’t too shabby, either. I didn’t know they could manufacture beautiful girls in the Eastern Bloc or Russia, given the technology of the times, after all, didn’t all their factories make tanks or tractors?
I remember seeing three Lancia Flaminas on the Lancia stand at the London Motor Show when I was a youngster – absolutely took my breath away , I had never realised cars could be so beautiful.
To really get an understand on how influental, but above all, how important that crease really is, we can look at a with/without pic of the Aston Martin Lagonda. In fairness, the earlier car has its sills painted black, to further enhance the feeling of flatness and vastness. Though the effect really is striking, and very different without the crease in the later car.
http://www.ridelust.com/wp-content/uploads/aston_martin_lagonda.jpg
http://www.supercars.net/gallery/119513/821/371932.jpg
Wow; I have never seen (or remember seeing) that early version of the Lagonda. A bold statement at the time to try to bring some new ideas into the design world, albeit a bit flawed. Ironically, I think I like the brutal starkness of the original better.
Agreed on preferring the slab-sided version. It’s a cleaner statement. Similar to my preference for the original 61-65 Lincoln over the beveled-edge 66 version.
Ingvar, thanks for the pics. I’ve loved that car for ages, and never conciously noticed the two variants.
I can recommend this site for Aston Martin history:
http://www.astonmartins.com/
With explanations of endless specials and one-offs. Browse into “The cars” section. Extensive Lagonda history at the AMV8 section.
I remember reading style critiques of the Camargue knocking it for “looking like a jumbo Fiat 130″.
As a car enthusiast, I’d rather have the 130. More useable, and certainly more servicable.
thanks, paul. i learn so much from your posts.
+1, Paul, I have no idea where you pick up this information or where else on the web one can learn so much about cars so easily. Just great work.
Damn…….that Ferrari is gorgeous.
Yes, the Florida is a stunner. How did Renault get away with calling their much less elegant Dauphine-based convertible the “Floride”?
I especially like the Peugeot 404 Coupé as a development of this Lancia Florida concept, but the 404 C also, in some respects represented a development of the Cadillac Jacqueline show car that Pininfarina did a couple of years earlier, especially the delicious scallop on the side, combined with the Florida. The result is brilliant and about 6 thousand 404 Coupés were made, so more people could enjoy this look. Of course, I am biased!
That Pininfarina is in such dire straits now is a tragedy…I had been hoping that Peugeot would go back to them for some design advice, as all their current cars excepting the dramatic and übercool RCZ are either plain or plain ugly. I hope someone saves this great design house of Pininfarina from oblivion.
Paul, articles like this and the one on the Tatra are awesome. I never would have related the Flaminia coupe to a ’66 Chevelle before today. The latest issue of Hemmings Sports and Exotic Car has an excellent article on the 404 coupe; the side surfacing on it is very unique and very sharp, with that gradual angle.
Excellent, I helped David LaChance with his research on that article, and Jim Schlick’s 404 C is nice!
The BMC 1100 was by far Issigonis’ greatest achievement, a far better package all round than the Mini which is highlighted by the fact the 1100 outsold the Mini by some margin.
Interesting to note also that some Ferraris use MGB (again pininfarina) tailamp clusters.
I thought I recognized those lights!
Whew! Thanks for the reminder of what a stunning thing the black Florida II is. I can almost convince myself I see the turquoise leather in the uppermost photo.
I believe the 57 Ford Skyliner actually had that roofline first, then the Thunderbird.
You’re quite right. I know that, but always tend to forget it. The Skyliner wasn’t very common. That roof tends to be strongly associated with the T-Bird. I’ve updated the text.
Ferrari 365 GT4 2+2, 400i, 412i were developments of the Fiat 130 version of this shape.
A lot of Japanese 60s cars like the Nissan pictured were Italian stylish. It was in the 70s that they lost the styling plot. Still reliable, well made, well equipped and VFM though. The wikipage for the Nissan President shows how they messed up the styling.
>> lets pay homage to the brilliant Ferraris that Pininfarina designed. It’s front end is dripping
Your apostrophes need to migrate from your it’ses to your letses.