The GMC “Twin Six” 702 V12 is legendary, although it’s not really all that unusual. V12 truck engines were not unheard of in the US and Europe, and the GMC’s 60 degree V6 certainly lent itself to doubling up. But it’s acquired an outsized reputation, and is a cult object for certain hot-rodders and bloggers, so let’s give it its 15 minutes of CC fame.
Let’s get the biggest myth out of the way first: these are not two 351 cube V6 “bolted” together. The 702 has its own block, but obviously shares many internal components as well as the V6 cylinder heads, valve covers and even intake manifolds and carbs.
And although they’ve ended up in some wild rods, these engines were a gasoline-powered alternative to the DD two-stroke “Jimmys”, in trucks like this “crackerbox” GMC COE. Exactly like the one that stood in front of me with a V12 badge at a red light, on old Hwy 40 outside Baltimore as I was hitch hiking, and then heard take accelerating through its very many gears. Very memorable indeed.
Although it hardly sounded like a Ferrari; the V12 had the lowest specific output of the whole V6-V12 line: 250 or 275 hp at 2400 rpm; and 585 or 630 lb.ft. of torque at 1600 rpm. That’s quite a contrast to the HD 427 Chevy V8 truck engine, which made 260 hp @ 4000 rpm, and 405 Ft. lbs. @2600 rpm.
Only about 5000 of the V12s were built between 1960 and 1965, and many of them were used as stationary industrial engines, like irrigation pumps, where they ran at full (governed) throttle for weeks on end. They effectively helped kill the truly legendary Hall-Scott OHC hemi V12 engines in that role, because the GMC was drastically cheaper (I promise a full history on the Hall-Scott engines this coming winter).
The 702 V12 has found its way into a number of “specials” including the Blastolene B702.
Here’s the B702 chassis and engine before that fanciful body was draped over it.
There’s even a company dedicated to the V12, ThunderV12. A rebuilt one starts at $10,900, if you’re thinking of upgrading your pickup. Yes, more than one has found its way under a GMC pickup hood.
So, now to hear one or two. Here’s a stock one, with just a bit of throttle blipping.
And here’s a ThunderV12, taken all the way to 5000 rpm, albeit very briefly. Enjoy.
The only thing left: imagine if GMC had used the biggest of the V6s, the 478 Magnum, to make a V12: 956 cubic inches and some 500 hp. Thunder and Lightning V12.











Goodness! I never knew these existed. There is probably not a mainstream brand that I am less informed of than GMC.
I must confess an unnatural attraction to V-12 engines. I don’t know why. Even bad ones like the flathead Lincoln of the 1940s, or hideously expensive to own ones like the Jag or BMW. But here is a V-12 that a guy can bolt in and forget about. Just pour lots and lots of fuel through it, and watch peoples faces as they try to guess what is under the hood of the GMC pickup that I would have to put it in.
Here is a local Lincoln V12 powered rod for you.
This has to be a first in the history of the world. I understood that almost everyone yanked the V12 out of their Lincolns and replaced them with Mercury V8s back in the day. I have never, ever heard of anyone putting a Lincoln V12 into a car by choice. Wow.
Or, the 1949-51 Ford truck based Lincoln V-8 and Cadillac/Buick/Olds engines found their way under hoods of the classic 1940-48 Continentals. As a kid, near a friend’s house, an old guy had a cheaply-repainted metallic gold ’40 or ’41 Continental and he showed us what was under the hood – said he replaced the V-12 with a V-8 flathead from a ’49 Lincoln.
I wonder if one will fit in my Miata.
“V12 Miata Affirms Man’s Sexuality” (Jag)
Yes, it’s a direct bolt-in replacement. Order yours today!
to MX5BRG91: Probably not even in a trailer behind you and have you be capable of pulling it. Great writeup Paul. Must confess I haven’t seen one of these in person and thought I had seen just about everything GMC had to offer. Was a fanboi when young.
Stationary engines and ginormous trucks are probably about the only thing you could use one for. The 702 probably exceeds that number in pounds.
The ThunderV12 website says:
Weight = 1,405 lbs with 3 gallons of oil. ( We had a guy with a straight 8 Packard respond “My straight 8 with transmission was 1,750 pounds.”)
That’s not so bad, for a truck engine. The V6 was a fairly compact engine to start with, and had to be light enough to work in even the smallest pickups.
This would be perfect under the hood of those 70s personal luxury cars that had 4 ft of crush space between the engine and the radiator. You could actually fill up the area under the hood…
So which transmissions actually bolt to this monstrosity?
All of these…
http://thunderv12.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/All_output_options_cropped_labled_resized.19174444_large.jpg
6L90E? Hope that’s an Allison Automatic cause I’d be frightened to have a trans that could handle all that torque.
The trans only has to handle more than the tyres I suppose!
They show a DIS setup on the mill with the 4L80. That’s pretty cool!
oops..
There was a Detroit Diesel V-12 from what I recall, not related to this motor, but it was available in GMC rigs, as well as others.
That would be the Detroit “Buzzin Dozen” 12V-71 at 14L. It also had a bigger 18.6L 16 Cyl version that will likely be the biggest motor that ever went into a on road truck.
Perfect for a half ton with tall gearing love the sound of the stocker thru open pipes.
I am getting a real education on this site. I had never heard of this engine either. I also am curious as to the transmission availability. A nice write up as usual.
Blastolene does some seriously neat stuff. That B702 is stunning. Piss’d Pete will always be my favorite though.
An engine choice as unusual as a Twin Six needs to be out in the open. Preferably with a Hilborn style FI system, 12 V stacks and 4 plaid valve covers would be a heck of a sight in a roadster of some type.
Next logical step:
Reproduce the block and heads in lightweight aluminum, with revised port design in the heads, and four-bolt mains and a premium forged crank in the bottom end.
Could or has the “twin 6″ ever been caste in aluminum ?
And 1mpg economy …
Lovely sounds! It reminds me of Dad’s Chris Craft with twin 327s (bored out to 350s).
A cool engine I didn’t know existed.
May the scrapyard yield me one of these. Tomorrow morning can’t come soon enough… Why couldn’t I just collect STAMPS?!