Long before it became an intermediate, the Buick Century was Buick’s hot rod, combining the shorter, smaller body of the entry-level Special with the bigger, more powerful engine from the posh Roadmaster. Although it took a break after WW2, the Century returned with a vengeance from 1954 to 1958, armed with the latest V-8 engines. The Century was quick even with Dynaflow automatic, but this 1955 hardtop has the rare stick shift, making a hot number even hotter.

In 1955, Buick offered four model series: the entry-level Series 40 Special, the Series 50 Super, the Series 60 Century, and the Series 70 Roadmaster. These names and numbers dated back to the late ’30s, although the Century had dropped out just before the start of WW2 and didn’t return until 1954.

The 1955 Super and Roadmaster both used the bigger GM C-body shell, shared with Cadillac and the Oldsmobile 98, with a 322-cid “Nailhead” V-8. The Special and the Century were B-bodies, similar in size to the Pontiac and the Oldsmobile 88. These were still full-size cars, but they were about 9 inches shorter than the C-body Buicks, on a 5-inch-shorter 122-inch wheelbase.

I should note that this particular 1955 Century, a Model 66R two-door Riviera hardtop, is not exactly the pinnacle of originality: It’s been repainted (it was originally tri-tone green and white, probably like this car); completely reupholstered; converted to power front disc brakes; and had its front anti-roll bar removed for unknown reasons. However, there aren’t many original stick-shift Buicks of this era still on the road. I don’t have automatic transmission installation rates for 1955, but for 1956, 96.5 percent of Buicks had automatic, and I doubt the 1955 figure was much lower than 95 percent. Dynaflow was standard on the Roadmaster, and it would also become standard on the Super and Century for 1956.
Dynaflow tends to get a bad rap from modern enthusiasts. The earliest version gave leisurely performance accompanied by curious whirring noises, but most of the later versions (there were five at different points in the ’50s) weren’t so bad. The version used in 1955 was the one-year-only single-stator twin-turbine Variable Pitch Dynaflow, which was a great improvement over the earliest iteration. For strongest off-the-line acceleration, it was still best to start in L and shift manually to D at around 50 mph, but starting in D was now adequate for most purposes, and it was still very smooth; Dynaflow was a continuously variable transmission, so there were no shift points.

Although very few Buick buyers still wanted it at this point, the 3-speed manual had some virtues of its own. The most important for price-conscious Buick Special buyers was probably that it saved you $192.50. However, the Buick 3-speed had some clear advantages from a performance standpoint. It was a close-ratio transmission (internal ratios were 2.39/1.53/1.00), and it was paired with a higher numerical axle ratio, 3.90 rather than the 3.40 axle specified with Dynaflow. Its low gear was not synchronized, and I’m not sure how cooperative the linkage was for fast shifting, but if you wanted maximum go, it was the way to go.

Like its pre-WW2 counterpart, the Century was the performer of the Buick line. While the Special used a smaller 264-cid V-8 with 188 hp, the Century had the 322-cid engine from the Super and Roadmaster. For 1955, this engine had an industry-leading 9.0 to 1 compression ratio and a new camshaft, increasing rated output to 236 hp and 330 lb-ft of torque. This provided very respectable performance even in the big Roadmaster, and the Century weighed a whopping 465 lb less, body style for body style.

Buick claimed the Century offered “more horsepower per dollar than any other car in America today,” which made it a surprisingly hot number. Motor Trend tested a 1955 Century sedan with Dynaflow in April 1955 and managed 0 to 60 in 9.8 seconds, with a top speed of 107 mph. A detailed evaluation of another Dynaflow-equipped Century sedan in the August 1955 issue of Science & Mechanics (whose results were even certified by the head of an independent automotive testing bureau) recorded a two-way average 0 to 60 time of 10.4 seconds with two crew members and their test gear, and trimmed that figure to just 9.44 seconds with only the driver aboard. They recorded an actual top speed of 108 mph.

I haven’t found any period road tests of a stick-shift Century, but its acceleration would only improve with manual transmission and the higher numerical axle ratio that went with it. (Top speed might conceivably suffer with the shorter gears, however; I don’t know if the stock engine would pull over 5,000 rpm in high.)

By later muscle car standards, a 10-second 0 to 60 time was nothing special, but in 1955, it put the Century into a rather elite class. For comparison, Road & Track‘s test of a 1955 Chevrolet with the 180 (gross) hp power pack V-8 and stick shift with overdrive was only fractionally quicker to 60 mph (9.7 seconds) than the half-ton-heavier, Dynaflow-equipped Century, and couldn’t quite match the Buick’s top speed. The Century was quick enough to run with the new Chrysler C-300 at any legal speed (though the Chrysler had more top end), and it was decisively quicker than mid-price rivals like Mercury or DeSoto. You paid for this muscle at the gas pump — MT recorded 11.6 mpg in simulated stop-and-go driving, on premium fuel, Science & Mechanics just 10.8 mpg — but you could blow the doors off most rivals.

Handling was another matter. Buick was selling comfort and class, not agility, and buyers seemed more interested in a pillowy ride than in brisk cornering. Motor Trend thought the 1955 Buicks were a bit firmer than in previous years, improving their composure somewhat, but these cars would lean and wallow in even moderately brisk driving. Power steering (which was standard on the C-body models, $107.50 on a Special or Century) still required 5½ turns lock-to-lock, and MT complained that you could too easily “beat” the power assist in a sudden maneuver. Buick brakes were not great either; the famous finned aluminum front drums didn’t arrive until 1958.

Although it was somewhat smaller on the outside than a Super or Roadmaster, the Century was still a roomy, richly appointed car. It wasn’t cheap: This Century Riviera two-door hardtop originally started at $2,601, over 30 percent more than a Chevrolet Bel Air V-8 in the same body style, and $269 more a two-door Special Riviera. With typical options — these were the days when even features like windshield washers and backup lights still cost extra — a Century stickered for at least $3,000, roughly $50,000 in 2026 dollars. A fully loaded example could top $4,000 (around $67,000 in 2026).

The Century’s fancy interior trim looked great in the showroom, but it did sometimes have its drawbacks in the real world. The Science & Mechanics test driver complained that the dashboard had “more glare traps that a dime store jewelry counter,” causing annoying reflections in the windshield.

Most 1955 Buicks had heaters and radios, although they were still optional. Buick offered factory air conditioning on most closed body styles by this time, but it was a hefty $591.30, so it was still very rare; this car doesn’t have it.

I’m not sure whether this Century’s wire wheels were original — perhaps not, since this car has only four of them, with a conventional spare. You could order a set of five real wire wheels as a factory option in 1955, although since they cost a painful $317.20 (the equivalent of more than $5,300 today), I think they’re far more common on restored cars than they ever were new.

Given how frequently Buick has offered “gentleman’s hot rods,” or even outright muscle cars, it’s fascinating how surprised people tend to be each time. I think maybe the reason is that Buick has only occasionally made a lasting commitment to keeping its hotter cars near the top of the performance heap. Anyone can make a fast car; establishing yourself as a recognized maker of fast cars takes sustained effort. In 1955, a Buick Century was a hot car; the even more powerful 1956 Century was still in the top ranks. However, while rivals kept at it, adding power-pack options, hot cams, and even fuel injection or superchargers, you could tell that wasn’t a priority for Buick. They weren’t involved in racing, and the biggest part of their volume was the cheaper Special. So, the Century’s performance edge quickly slipped away, and the Century disappeared again for 1959, replaced by the Invicta, which was always a nonentity. When the conceptually similar ’60s Wildcat began offering dual-quad engines and even a 4-speed manual gearbox, everyone acted surprised again, and that incredulity haunted the intermediate Gran Sport for its entire run.

That leaves the 1955 Century as an interesting curio. The days when the “Century” nameplate meant performance are gradually passing from living memory — the A-body intermediates that later bore this name were more numerous and longer-lived, albeit seldom very exciting. Today, even fans of ’50s cars often don’t realize that that the B-body Buick Century was once among the fastest cars in the land. This one sold for $32,550 in October 2025, and before that for $43,000 in December 2024.
Related Reading
1941 Buick Century Sedanet With Compound Carburetion – Buick’s First Muscle Car (by me)
Cohort Pic(k) of the Day: 1955 Buick Buick Century Riviera Hardtop Coupe – Don’t Mess With Me (by Paul N)
Curbside Classic: 1955 Buick Special Sedan–Battleship (by Stephen Pellegrino)
Curbside Comparison: 1955 Oldsmobile Eighty Eight vs. 1955 Buick Special – Battle of The B’s (by Laurence Jones)
1956 Buick Centurion – Motorama’s Vision Of A Future Without Rearview Mirrors (by Aaron65)
Full-Size Buicks Of The 1960s: How Buick Reinvented Its Lineup Between 1959 And 1970 (by me)

























Famously, thanks to television, the California Highway Patrol bought Buick in 1955: the big engine in the small body.
21-50, bye…”
The next year, Dodge got the contract.as it would with few exceptions until 1989.
Aaron I’m guessing that this beauty has the Cadillac/LaSalle 3 speed transmission which was a desirable unit for hot rodders.
I recall Buick had some quality control issues with the brake drums making them substandard and prompting the upgrade to finned aluminum drums.
Was the Cadillac manual even in production in 1955?
In one of the Highway Patrol episodes mentioned above, you can clearly hear the famous low-gear Buick growl as one of the cars is started up a hill. Buick’s manual transmission used straight-cut gears in first, and it made a very distinctive sound.
I think the Cadillac/LaSalle manual used helical gears in all forward speeds, like Packard. But I’m open to correction.
I think you’re right. My source says Cadillac 3 speed last used in ’53. They would have only been special ordered for commercial chassis like an ambulance or hearse.
I cannot find anything on the Buick transmission. I did find a source claiming Hot Rod magazine published something in the late 50s about using the Buick trans.
The specifications Buick submitted to the AMA for 1955 indicate that the manual transmission had helical gears in all speeds. It was likely the same transmission previously used on manual-shift Cadillacs; the ratios were identical. (That transmission was no longer available on Cadillacs in 1955.)
Well, that seems pretty definitive, then.
Here’s the Highway Patrol clip that made me think otherwise (18 minutes in if it doesn’t embed.)
https://youtu.be/BB4itEXhBjE?si=jb4LJhwgSUdMbJC_&t=1083
I guess that’s within the range of what a helical low gear can sound like, but I would have expected better from a Cadillac transmission?
Maybe, but there are a couple of other possibilities to consider. First, TV and movie cars lead very hard lives, and it’s not uncommon for them to have various mechanical ailments that the cast and crew just have to live with. Second, movie and TV sound effects are very often dubbed in from other sources, which don’t necessarily correspond to the thing you’re actually seeing onscreen. Sound editors have whole libraries of stock sounds, and sounds like car doors slamming may be simulated by foley artists. Broadcast TV shows are made on tight budgets and tight schedules, which encourages a lot of “Ehh, good enough” decisions. We’ve all seen movies and shows where a car drives off and there’s a stock engine sound that obviously doesn’t match the car. I have no idea if that was the case there, but it’s not unlikely.
A big disconnect between engine/exhaust sounds in a film was In Thunderball. Bond hitchhikes after being stranded on the beach in the Bahamas, and is picked up and taken on a fast ride by a villainess in a blue 1965 Mustang convertible. IIRC the engine/exhaust sounds bore no resemblance to a 260 or 289 Ford V8, and were more like that of a small European sports car.
How about Bullit where Steve McQueen seems to have a 10 speed manual in his Mustang. Continually upshifting again and again.
Chps TV show had 2 stroke motorcycles sounding like 4 strokes and visa versa.
Four “Buick holes” (as my ex used to call them)? I thought that was Roadmaster-only.
Oops…my comment got trashed.
As Aaron65 says below, that was no longer true beginning in 1954.
In the case of the Century, it became an important bit of identification. Buick was selling a LOT of Specials in this era (Buick was No. 3 at this point, with over 10 percent of the market), and the extra VentiPort helped to signal that the Century, which was a good bit more expensive, was not a more commonplace Special.
Sweet big Buick bomber. Just needs a tri-power intake, headers and dual exhausts (I’m quite surprised that duals weren’t standard on this).
But if I were looking for a hot new ’55, I’d pick the Chevy. Lighter, better handling, and very easy to make faster.
What a looker!
One of many very attractive cars during this era. How people have changed. Now nearly everyone is elated to have a grey SUV.
When Better Cars are built; Buick will build them! Those were the Glory Days!
OEM Buick power brake master cylinders were mounted under the floorboard through 1959. I believe they were one of the last cars to retain such a design. There are conversion kits to remount a modern dual master cylinder setup on the firewall. I’m not seeing such a kit or a booster on this car. It looks like the stock defroster box is still in place where the conversion kit would normally mount. I would think a brake upgrade would be high on any priority list if the owner wasn’t going for original – and the alternator indicates the owner is not shy about upgrades. I just don’t see evidence of a brake upgrade on the photo.
Observe.
Quite right Mr. Aaron. This photo sure shows a brake upgrade. Still not seeing the booster, but I can believe there is one since all disc brake conversions I’ve seen do include a booster. I wouldn’t have questioned you on the upgrade had this photo been part of your original posting.
The ironic thing is that it originally was, but I cut it for length …
That was traditionally true, but by 1955, all models except the Special had four VentiPorts. It wasn’t like it was a long tradition, as VentiPorts were introduced in 1949, but it seemed to be counterproductive.
This comment is a response to John Hempel above.
What a stunner! I realize the car has been repainted in Resale Red, but still…Impressive profile with fully exposed rear wheels (unlike so many of its contemporaries in 1955), that long dash to front axle ratio, those genuine Kelsey-Hayes wire wheels, the wrapped windshield with not too intrusive A-pillar doglegs, and an exterior with a tasteful helping of chrome (albeit arguably so on the front end).
I have a ’54 Special 2 door with a 264 nailhead and 3 on the tree. 99 percent complete and needs restoring, but it runs and moves.
Lovely ;
I like resto – rods like this, I cannot imagine why they left the sway bar off .
The “Highway Patrol” link does indeed go straight to the right place, helical cut gears were not entirely silent back then .
-Nate