What happens when you stretch an automotive concept further than it can go? You might end up with something like this oddball limousine conversion, based on a 1966 Ford Mustang hardtop. It’s a cautionary tale for Ford Motor Company, which is once again contemplating the idea of adding a four-door Mustang, even as sales of the current coupe and Mach-E continue to slide.
In a 2026 interview with Automotive News, Ford executive Andrew Frick, president of Ford Blue and Model e, hinted that Ford might develop a four-door sedan version of the current Mustang, remarking “We look to expand on the Mustang family as we move forward.” This is hardly the first time that Ford has considered offering a four-door Mustang — in fact, as the adjacent photos show, there was a full-size styling mock-up of a four-door variant more than a year before the first Mustang went on sale.
This styling model (which was built as a two-door hardtop on the left and a four-door on the right) was photographed on January 4, 1963. When it was built, Ford hadn’t yet settled on the “Mustang” name, so there’s no prancing horse iconography, and the badge on the front fender reads “Cougar.”
I’m not sure how well the seating package would have worked out with this close-coupled design; the Lincoln Continental, which was also an adaptation of a design conceived as a two-door hardtop coupe had had to adopt rear-hinged back doors to make rear entry and exit practical.
Although the four-door didn’t make it for the first-generation Mustang, there were some echoes of it in the 1966–1970 Fairlane-based Falcon. The Australian versions, beginning with the “Mustang-bred” XR Falcon in September 1966, were very successful down under, but the U.S. Falcon sedan was a nonentity.
Ford has of course been offering a five-door Mustang CUV since late 2020, in the form of the electric Mustang Mach-E, which I think has come closer to completely losing the plot than any of Ford’s previous misadventures with the Mustang nameplate. Until quite recently, the Mach-E seemed on track to eventually replace the coupe, which it actually outsold in calendar 2024 and 2025. If it did, it would be the final nail in the Mustang’s coffin as a coherent brand concept.
I want to be clear about my objections to the Mach-E: I have no problem with battery electric vehicles, and I’d have no issue with the prospect of a BEV Mustang coupe. (The Mustang has had all kinds of engines over the years, BEVs are where the market is going, and a modern BEV seldom lacks for blistering acceleration.) Also, I don’t actually dislike the Mach-E. It seems competent enough for what it is, and it’s not bad-looking, as CUVs go. I saw one on the road the other day and thought it was one of the handsomer of the current array of crossovers.
However, calling a five-door CUV a Mustang is like calling a Sparkletts water dispenser a tea kettle, and it foreshadows a rather gloomy future for the Mustang brand.
The original raison d’être of the Mustang, and what’s kept it going through many generations, is that it’s always been a car people buy instead of a four-door sedan, station wagon, five-door hatchback, or other utilitarian vehicle. The Mustang has never been as impractical as a two-seater like the Corvette, but it’s always been impractical enough to feel like an indulgence rather than a concession. Prior to the Mach-E, choosing a Mustang — even a four- or six-cylinder Mustang — was a way of signifying that you were not a slave to utility, and that you still had some youthful dash and pizzazz (whether or not you were actually young). In the pre-child-seat era, you could carry a small family in a Mustang, but it was not a family car, and for many buyers, that was the whole point.
It’s very possible that we will soon reach a point where there’s no longer any sustainable market for that. Child seat laws have made coupes too much of a hassle for people with preteen kids, and most of the coupes left on the market are too expensive for the young people who used to buy cars like the Mustang in great numbers. Also, there are now three generations of Americans of driving age who’ve grown up almost entirely with four-door sedans and SUVs, and don’t see what the big deal is. Mustang coupe sales are not robust (combined U.S. and Canadian sales in calendar 2025 were only 49,028 cars), and since it IS the last actual car Ford Motor Company still sells, if the coupes expires, there’s little chance of it being resurrected on some other platform. The Mach-E is no longer doing well either; U.S. Mach-E sales recently collapsed with the loss of federal EV subsidies, and it sold fewer than 10,000 units in the first five months of 2026, barely half what it managed in the same period in 2025.
Nonetheless, even if sales of both the coupe and Mach-E pass the point of no return, Ford won’t want to relinquish the valuable Mustang trademark, which may lead to some grimmer and more desperate product decisions. Can you envision a “Mustang® Heritage Appearance” package for the Bronco or F-150? I can, and I wish I couldn’t.
This brings us, in a roundabout way, to this bizarre Mustang limousine conversion, which showed up on Bring a Trailer in June 2026. No, this probably won’t be the model for the truck-based Mustang of the 2030s — it’s much too low for that — but it’s a particularly extreme example of what happens when you stretch an idea past the breaking point.
The seller didn’t have a lot of background to offer on this conversion, which was done at least 20 years ago by a previous owner. The warranty plate reveals that the car was originally a 1966 six-cylinder/automatic hardtop. It left the factory in the same color it sports now, Tahoe Turquoise, combined with the standard interior in Aqua.
You can tell this conversion was built a long time ago by the fact that it uses 17-inch wheels rather than 22- or 23-inch rims. Along with the aftermarket wheels and assorted structural bracing to keep the structure from being turned to Jell-O by the stretch, it’s been retrofitted with front disc brakes.
The original 200 cid six is long gone, replaced by a 289 V-8 with some typical aftermarket addenda. There wasn’t much information about those either, except to note that the engine has been fitted with an aftermarket aluminum radiator.
The front cabin has gotten the usual “mild” aftermarket dress-up, with an aftermarket Lecarra steering wheel, white faces for the dashboard gauges, auxiliary gauges on the console, and so on. I’m not too keen on that kind of stuff, but it’s very common, and if this weren’t a limousine conversion, it wouldn’t bear comment.
Along with the sports console, the interior has been redone along 1966 Interior Decor Option (“Pony interior”) lines, albeit with F2 Blue and White two-tone vinyl rather than Aqua. Ford wouldn’t combine the blue interior with a Tahoe Turquoise exterior in 1966, but my understanding (which may be incomplete or outdated) is that while you can get replacement upholstery in Aqua or Aqua and White, some soft parts, like the dash pad, aren’t reproduced in Aqua and have to be custom-dyed. So, whoever redid the interior may have decided that blue and white was simpler.
The limousine’s rear doors are Mustang front doors, mounted backwards (with the hinges at the rear).
In the rear, a lounge area has been constructed from surplus and reproduction Mustang parts. The seats are Mustang rear seats, upholstered in the same replacement F2 Blue and White vinyl trim as the front. Obviously, with a conversion like this, “factory-correct” quickly ceases to be meaningful, but in areas where you can see the blue upholstery next to the turquoise paint, it becomes clear why Ford didn’t offer that combination.
To me, the horrifying thing about this limousine conversion is that it’s sort of clever in a kitschy way, like a Spencer Gifts novelty item or one of those retro diners whose booths look like cars.
However, all the exposed bolt heads in the massive slabs of vinyl siding seem cheap, and while a Mustang hardtop doesn’t have rear armrests, they wouldn’t go amiss here.
This contraption is registered in Florida, and even with the pop-up sunroof, rear ventilation is probably not so great. (It looks like the vent windows are fixed.)
To compensate, there’s a rear air conditioner with the controls on the package shelf.
Under the decklid boomerang antenna, the trunk is the same old poorly finished Mustang trunk, with the plaid vinyl mat that adorned many a cheap Ford, and with the potentially very hazardous drop-in fuel tank.
The seller believes that the vinyl top was added some time after the original conversion, which makes me wonder why. For stretch jobs like this, a vinyl top can be like throwing a blanket over an old couch, covering all manner of scars and structural problems. Since this conversion is a platform unit body stretched to 257 inches overall (more than 6 feet longer than when it left the factory), I wouldn’t be surprised to find that the roof is wrinkling under the vinyl.
Is this thing still a Mustang? From a legal standpoint, it’s a Mustang, and it’s registered as one. The philosophical question is more complicated. Is the Frankenstein monster still a man, even though he’s made of corpses?
There are a bunch of comments on the Bring a Trailer auction that were hidden for being non-constructive, I assume for lamenting the monstrosity of this conversion. A number of other people pointed out that given the huge numbers of first-generation Mustangs Ford built, it’s silly to get mad about someone deciding to turn a random six-cylinder hardtop into a bizarre novelty item. They had a point: This is a Mustang, not a Bugatti Type 57SC, and being outraged about the customization of a very common mass-market car is like getting offended when people paint their sneakers or tie-dye their band T-shirts.
But, what happens if the current Mustang coupe and Mach-E expire without replacement, and the only new “Mustangs” left are “heritage” design cues slapped on vehicles that have no relationship at all to to the Mustang as we know it, other than Ford’s desire to extract another few grand from buyers of expensive pickup trucks and SUVs?
If it comes to that, the prospect of a conventional four-door Mustang sedan (which I think is probably unlikely at this point, Frick’s comments to Automotive News notwithstanding) might seem like getting off easy — and this Frankenstein-like conversion might still be more Mustang than any future Mustangs we can hope to see from Ford.
Related Reading
Curbside Classic: 1965 Mustang – Freedom; Starting At $2368 (by Paul N)
QOTD: 1965 Mustang Four Door Sedan Concept – How Would History Have Been Changed If It Had Been Built? (by Paul N)
Curbside Review: 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD – Galloping At The Speed Of Silence (by Jim Klein)
That just HAS to be SW Florida, making this baby limo the “Florida Man” of Mustangs. Yuck.
That Mustang limo remind me of the AMC Pacer stretched limousine we saw at the end of the movie Wayne’s World 2.
https://imcdb.org/vehicle_4997-AMC-Pacer-Stretched-Limousine.html
As a Mustang owner I could not agree more with your premise. The Mach E seems to be a very fine car, but it is not a Mustang; I would go so far as calling it a heresy. I have people asking me if my car is electric, because now in the heads of some people, Mustang means the Mach-E…. great way of throwing to the wind 60 years of tradition and GM appears to be headed the same way with the 2028 Camaro
Regarding the Limo, I do not dislike it if viewed as a one off, crazy idea. Would be good for a party or similar event
PS: I believe the Mustang with FX package to be Adriatic Blue, not Vapor blue
Oops, you are quite right. Fixed now. Thanks!
Clever use of front doors, side reversed, for the rears. I actually kinda like it from the front 3/4 view, but in that last pic – the side view – it’s awful. Unless that’s some optical illusion from something white in the bkg peeking above the rear roof section. Please say that it is?
+1: I was all ready to say as a Mustang enthusiast, I’m not hatin’ on this thing. But you’re right. That last picture from profile shows how off the proportions really are here.
Overall though, I like what I see here. This would a very cool car at a wedding or some other event.
The rumor on the message boards is that Ford is planning a Mustang SUV on the CD6 platform sometime late the decade, which will basically be a 2 row Explorer with Mustang styling cues.
The Mustang going in that platform has actually been the rumor for some time, the CD6 was intended to be a modular platform for both SUV and sedans, so if the Mustang is moved to it it won’t necessarily be a SUV, just a presumably huge Mustang sedan and/or coupe
Correct it was supposed to underpin the Lincoln Continental too which was a big driving force behind it being RWD.
Note the Mustang doesn’t have to necessarily be bigger to share the CD6 platform. Ford trimmed ~7″ of wheelbase and ~8″ of OAL out of the DEW 98 to make a 2 seater out of a Lincoln Sedan.
In defense of Ford and the Mech-E, I guess, they are considering the Mustang a sporty sub brand, and since Tesla established the way to sell an EV is sporty, they went that way. I was, however, very confused when I heard about the electric Mustang, and then later heard it was a CUV. A 4 door Mustang could maybe work, idk, kind of like the Audi A5 4 door “coupe”, which I see not infrequently.
I have to think a big reason Mustang proper sales are falling is pricing. Since all other pony car competition is gone, it’s now close to $50k just to get into a V8 powered Mustang. I know traditionally a lot of the sales volumes are 6 cylinders, but it is supposed to be an affordable concept, and that’s not it
Or maybe just a “lifestyle brand,” probably with internal comparisons to Harley-Davidson. The problem with that is that I think if they assume they can continue the Mustang brand without having some kind of credible Mustang to sell, the effect is going to be like one of those Looney Tunes cartoons where Wiley Coyote runs off a cliff, pauses in mid-air, and then abruptly plummets.
I don’t think that a “cheaper BMW 4-Series Gran Coupe” four-door is necessarily a bad pitch, although whether there’s a market for that either is another question.
That Limo could have been the Monkey Mobile I think it works !
I agree that Mustang has been an iconic name and concept, but time moves on. One of the most significant cars of my adult life was the original Honda Accord hatch; a modern Accord 4 door sedan really bears no relationship but (to Honda;s credit in most people’s opinion) they have been consistent with their branding for 50 years now.
Ditto on the side profile. At least the tires are almost new, but cannot read the actual load rating in pounds, but they say “EXTRA LOAD”. Blowing up the tire/wheel photo reveals they have good temperature and traction ratings. It must ride awful when empty and bottom out when full unless air bags were installed.
I share your sentiments on the Mach E, I never balked at the idea of a Mustang EV but putting the badge on a crossover was as absurd and cynical as putting the Cougar badge on a wood paneled station wagon (Ford never seems to learn.) Personally I think it looks uncomfortably like a 20 year old Infiniti FX with mustang badges and taillights. And no I’m not anti EV either and by most accounts it seems like a perfectly adequate EV that isn’t a Tesla, problem is that’s basically exactly what the buyers are interested in, not it being the “iconic” Mustang and being the coolest EV owner on the block because of it. Perhaps some initial buyers felt that way, but so did Cybertruck buyers(whoops). With the EV demand being rather stalled and other compelling alternatives since it’s no surprise it’s fallen off, with or without subsidies. With the freshness worn off it blends into with everything else looks like a 20 year old Infiniti FX with mustang badges and taillights.
As for the state of the Mustang in general, I don’t think the direction Ford’s taken with it since the retro S197s has done any favors for sales; more and more useless horsepower(to the point the base V8 is knocking on 500), less and less space and visibility, more and more ponderous exterior width and more and more cost(not that’s a unique Mustang problem). That the late Challenger of all nameplates handily outsold the Mustang coupe for a stretch of years speaks volumes, and speaks to the market for such a car does desire some modicum of practicality, much like the first generation mustangs with the notchback coupe being what truly resonated with buyers. About the time of the release of the Coyote 5.0 Ford seemed to want to reposition the Mustang as the brand’s Corvette; a true sports car, to the point now with the ridiculous couple hundred thousand dollar GTD!
I’m sorry but the Mustang seemed to be at its best when its specs were merely adequate but its styling inside and out was attractive(sacrificing the double hump dash for… screens is another bone I have to pick with the latest iteration). Maybe a sedan could work, the Charger/Challenger duo seemed to do well enough for Dodge before their notorious Daytona fumble. Bringing some semblance of practicality to the Mustang name without throwing the baby away with the bathwater like the Mach E seemed poised for would be a welcome reinvention. But whether anyone buys it is the big question, sedans are almost as dead as coupes these days, and Ford’s modern notion of models being a “brand” makes me wince every time I hear it. Maybe fix the Ford brand before concocting spinoffs.
I think what’s going on with the Mustang at this point is that Ford has essentially given up on the idea of expanding its market and is instead doubling down on collector bait in a desperate attempt to hold the attention of its diminishing existing audience — a lot of whom by now probably realize the future of the Mustang as a coherent entity is very much in doubt and are trying to decide which collector’s edition to stick in long-term storage as their “highly collectible last Mustang!”
That in its own way is also depressing.
I hadn’t thought of it that way but as I think about it I think you nailed it, the GTD is the ultimate Mustang for the man who dreamed of their old/new/old restomodded Mustang being the ultimate Mustang, and it’s the last ditch blowout model to get their attention. It’s like the 02-05 Thunderbird but for the Mustang people, on steroids.
From my perspective the hot Mustangs of my youth were the Terminator Cobra, Mach 1s of the late New Edge generation and the initial Shelby GT500s of the S197 generation. For personal nostalgic reasons I still hold them high, but even at the time when I saw the deemphasis of SVT of the previous generation and reemphasis on Shelby (who while still alive at the time had exactly as much to do with the resultant model in 2007 as you or I did), strongly signaled to me the Mustang was less a transcendent nameplate for the generations, but a icon tailored to one generation, who at the time had money to fork out for ever pricier exclusive Mustangs, new and old, and still largely do in diminishing numbers.
The depressing part is I do think the traditional Mustang coupe does have appeal to younger generations, but the entirety of them buy them used. And why not, the 2015 design was a very strong design, even a Luddite like me appreciates it, but it’s also 11 years old still looks current and what does it really give up to a current S650(because it’s totally a different platform than S550…)? The Ecoboost is easy to mod, the 5.0 GTs had more power than you’ll ever need to begin with, the Shelby’s were and remain well to do collector toys so what’s the ongoing allure to get into them or even trade up for enthusiasts of the brand?
Going back to that late New Edge/S197 era of my early driving age the Mustang seemed universally accessible and appealing; first of all the the top dog SVT models weren’t quite as ludicrously out of reach but moreover the regular V6 and GT models had an appeal in just simply being relatively affordable, relatively cheap to run and maintain and relatively usable coupes worthy of spending at least a few years with on a whim for even the non-gearhead buyers, and to this day I still see more regular V6s of those generations in traffic even though rust is a big deal here . The Mustang since has leaned heavily on being more of lifestyle vehicle where its audience seems ever more captive and diminishing.
The other thing I think we’re seeing is the effect of the loss of the cheapo low-end Mustang market that used to bolster total volume. While Mustang enthusiasts and the car magazines mostly ignored them or derided them as “secretarial transport,” Ford sold a decent number of rental-car-grade four- and six-cylinder cars (around half of total production for the Fox and SN95, maybe more for the S197), and that made the GT, SVT, Shelby, and other performance models viable. That market is almost totally gone now, and it’s probably not coming back. The problem is that they can’t really go any lower in price (the base EcoBoost coupe right now is starting at $32,995, and Ford is offering “employee pricing” of $30,658), and a coupe or convertible is only really practical for either the childless, child-free, or empty-nester, which skews the audience older and less tolerant of the old Fisher-Price interior plastics and obvious corner-cutting.
It appears that the Mustang Mach E will die before long. It was a financial disaster, massively unprofitable to build and along with the already killed F150 Lightning, the cause of many billions of losses of Ford’s Blue (EV) segment. The Mach E was way to complicated and poorly designed to ever have a hope of being profitable. Ford was chasing Tesla but didn’t grok Tesla’s secret sauce. It was an embarrassing example of how the traditional car makers didn’t actually get how Tesla designed and built cars. The Mach E ended up way too complex, heavy, and expensive to build.
Good riddance, as I for one thought it was over styled, but that’s subjective.
As for four-door Mustangs, bring it on. As Aaron pointed out, two-door coupes have serious limitations. The Europeans have been moving to four doors for just about everything; one can’t even get a 2-door GTI anymore.
And this limo had its 4-bolt 6 cylinder hubs upgraded to 5 bolt V8 versions. Good call. I shudder to think what else is hiding under its skin to keep this from bending in the middle.
Do the people that name these things ever think about long term fallout to the company? I know they are desperate for boomer bucks because your generation is aging out of car ownership and younger generations don’t have anywhere near your purchasing power, but come on. Using the mustang name to justify larding up an overbuilt and cheaply made electric crossover with options and pricing it to the moon is just sad. Plenty of people lapped it up though, just like they did in the ’70s. I guess they’ll just lean back on old reliable: 85k F-150s and nearly 100k broncos with heritage packs, along with their mainstay, nearly 50k bronco sports. My local dealership sells them to the 65+ crowd like hotcakes.
The average age of a new Mustang buyer was 53 a couple of years ago. That’s a bit younger than boomers, although of course that’s just an average. But yes, that average has been getting higher over the years. I suspect the Mustang magic does not have as strong a pull on the younger generations.
Yes, all the manufacturers are focusing on higher priced vehicles, as long as they can move them. But Ford’s Maverick has been a genuine hit and is spawning competition (Toyota and others).
I think something lost on a lot of people is boomers may well have been the prime demographic to lionize the original first gen Mustangs, but the Mustang was impactful for following generations like Gen X and older Millennials, so that median age isn’t a big surprise. The fact that Mustang GTs since 2011 sport a 5.0 badge on the fender like a foxbody or that there’s a setting in the current gen’s LCD gauge cluster(ugh) for foxbody style gauges goes to show it wasn’t all Beatles and Woodstock types who loved Mustangs, credit where is deservedly due the Mustang was cross generational in its appeal for much of its existence, but “was” may unfortunately be the key word there.
As an aside, part of what always bothered me about the original 05-09 iteration of the S197 generation was in spite of being very well done retro styling, there was a noticeable shift I saw first hand in the Mustang community where there was an influx of older guys who were very dismissive of the Foxbodies and SN95 generation of which I had many friends and admired the many project cars of the era I still find extremely cool compared to the mostly cosmetic focused mods of Mustangs 05- present…. But the comments of “Boxy Foxbodies” and “Ugly SN95s” gradually made me give up on those local clubs. I built up a real “built not bought” attitude from them I still harbor.
I think Ford flirted with the concept of a Mustang Fordor a few years back, as I found this picture on my hard drive.
It has a Car & Driver watermark on it, so perhaps it was speculation back then on that magazine’s part.
I seem to recall posting this here once before, and a reply to my comment said, “Nice Fusion”. LOL
Car & Driver should have photoshopped a bit more, converting this Mustang Fordor into a Thunderbird, after all there was once a Fordor T-bird. 😉
Now then you mention the idea of a “Nice Fusion”, imagine if this was a RWD Fusion just to be a bit more different in a sea of FWD Camrys, Accords, Altimas,… 😉
I struggle with the looks of the stock mustang from this era, but the stretchstang is good for a laugh.
When I saw the Pic the first thought that came to mind was an accident an hour from where where I live that took the lives of a wedding party involving a shoddily built limo.
Nothing less than 1/4″ 6″x3″ rectangular steel side rails would make me feel comfortable sitting in these things.
Saw this on Barnfinds and was intrigued. Nice to see it covered here, and even better with the accompanying story. The current Mustang coupe sells very well here in New Zealand, even my small rural town (population 5,000) has several. I don’t see too many of the Mach E around, but they’re one of the few EVs I actually like the look of – they do have a hint of Mustang personality, and I’d rather that in my EV than nothing. I want to hate the Mustang limo, but it looks to have been really well done and, stretch aside, is quite subtle.
The first comment is “YUCK,” I agree. Also, no seatbelts. As for the Ford Cougar concept car, it says Falcon all over it and reveals what lies under a Mustang of the original iteration. Thanks for showing us this horrid Mustang limousine. At least, we have seen one.
There was never a good reason to call the Mach-E a Mustang – all that did was to water down the name and draw righteous indignation from the purists. It seems like a similar play to what happened to the Cougar in the late-70s. I’m not sure the world needed an electric Mustang, but it sure didn’t need a “Mustang” crossover. The only inspiration for that was to juice a marginal product. I hope Ford wises up and keeps the basic Mustang V8 sports coupe package alive as long as it’s feasible – even if sales dwindle to the point where it’s just strung along on minor refreshes.
As for this particular car, I have to say it’s kind of cool. For anyone offended at the potential ruination of a classis, there are plenty more fish in the sea. Such conversions are highly questionable, structurally. This one at least passes a cursory lookover, with the added bracing, disk brakes, and bigger radiator. You do see attempts at this kind of thing with the original (and already marginal) cooling and brakes. Still, that chassis is likely to be heavily overtaxed, and I hate to think how it’d take something like a side collision. That said, if the intent was just to build something unique as a Sunday driver, cruise night car, I’m fine with it. It is absurd, the proportions are off, and there are way too many liabilities for it to be put to regular use. Call it a pure flight of fancy, but almost done well enough to pass for factory work. Not that they would. And maybe that’s the point.
“ I hope Ford wises up and keeps the basic Mustang V8 sports coupe package alive as long as it’s feasible – even if sales dwindle to the point where it’s just strung along on minor refreshes.”
I optimistically imagine this will be the case. If Ford thinks strongly enough of the name to spin it off into a brand of its own I doubt it’s going anywhere anytime soon, and even with the Mach E selling better for a moment I really never had any fear it would ever become the defacto Mustang, sales aren’t everything. The coupe platform they have is solid and though it was revised to be called “S650” it’s really just a light update of the 10 year old S550, so even if sales aren’t dismal I’m not sure it’s costing Ford too much to keep it around.
Ford kept the core Fox underpinnings around for 25 years through the SN95 generation, and that was a much more primitive of a chassis even at 10 years old than the current chassis is at roughly that age. Personally I wish it was smaller like foxbody size but it’s what we got.
At the end of the day I truly believe as long as GM has a Corvette in the traditional sport coupe format, Ford will have the Mustang in it as well. I think we’ve all seen the departure and heard rumors more of the grim crossover shaped future of the Camaro, but the difference is the Camaro and Corvette are in this polarized consolidated world effectively redundant products as sporty coupes, where the Mustang really is still Ford’s only product in the genre, minus the odd occasional Ford GT supercars.