Ten years ago I shot and posted a Rampage and titled it “Losing The Battle To Big Pickups (and Moss)“. That clearly seemed to be the way things were going then, with trucks getting bigger with each generation, even those that started out decades ago as mini-pickups. But in the last couple of years there seems to be a shift in the air; the Ford Maverick has been a hit, within the limits of Ford’s production capacities for it, and Hyundai has fielded the Santa Cruz, although not with the success of the Maverick.
But there’s even smaller pickups in the works, expected in the next year or so, both of them EVs. That would be the Slate, which will only come with a single cab and Ford’s much-ballyhooed low cost EV platform, the first variant of which will also be a pickup. Are we about to see the renaissance of the truly compact pickup?
Before we jump into that speculation, let’s set the background first. Of course the Japanese wave of mini-pickups in the late ’60s and through the ’80s was more like a tsunami, and they eventually got bigger and bigger until they became essentially mid-size pickups. And of course they all had dedicated small truck platforms with frames and such, which made them suitable to be upgraded to haul bigger loads and be very off-road capable in the 4×4 versions. It doesn’t seem so likely that that format will return as such.
But genuinely compact pickups based on genuinely compact passenger cars have been around for almost forever, although they were not seen in the US (except for the tiny Crosley) until Subaru brought over its rather odd-ball little BRAT in 1978. With its quite short bed, standard AWD, and two rear-facing seats in the bed (to circumvent the “chicken tax”), the BRAT was less of a genuine pickup than a lifestyle vehicle. Enough young men who saw it as a more civilized Jeep alternative bought them to keep the BRAT going for two generations. A mini-hit, thanks to thinking a bit outside of the box.
Presumably VW was inspired by the BRAT to VW take a dive in this little pool with their 1980 VW pickup, based of course on the Rabbit/Golf, with an extended wheelbase and a more rugged rear suspension. The big difference was that the VW pickup was positioned more as a genuine hauler with its long bed. And it lacked 4WD. As a result, that risky dive turned into more like something of bath for VW, as the little FWD pickup did not get much traction in the US, although it has developed a massive cult following and they are still to be found on the streets and at work, like this one. VW bailed After four years, VW bailed and the tooling was sent to South Africa and then-Yugoslvavia, and renamed the Caddy. It’s been a fixture in VW lineup ever since.
Chrysler must have thought VW was going to have a hit on their hands, because in 1982 their copy of the concept arrived in the form of the Dodge Rampage. Based on their own “Rabbit” (Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon), the Rampage actually shared the front end external sheet metal and such with the sporty coupe variants, the Dodge 024 (later Charger) and the Plymouth TC3 (later Turismo). And there was even a short-lived Plymouth Scamp version in 1983. Good luck finding one of those.
Chrysler sort of split the difference in terms of bed size between the BRAT and the VW Pickup, and using the coupe’s front body half was clearly intended to add a sporty flavor to the Rampage. But it didn’t make enough of a difference to save it from being cancelled after three weak years.
The only engine that found their way into these was Chrysler’s then-ubiquitous 2.2L four, then rated at 84 hp. Perhaps a bit more zest might have enhanced the sporty vibe Chrysler was apparently after, but the turbo version of the 2.2 didn’t come along until 1985. There was a dealer-created Shelby Rampage, but only some 218 were sold.
This example sports an added hood bulge as also used on that Shelby Rampage, but I rather doubt this is one of them, given their minute numbers and the unlikely hood that it wouldn’t still have some Shelby badges or such a, even if this has been repainted. But who knows what’s actually under the hood; quite possibly it is one of the several turbo versions of the four that were made for a number of years.
No Shelby stickers or badges, but there is a prancing horse.
It is sporting a stick shift, which of course was pretty common back then.
Back to 2025: as mentioned earlier, there’s two EV compact/passenger car based pickups in the wings. The Slate truck is an ambitious effort to build a bare-bones truck using unorthodox production methods (plastic exterior panels that need no paint or extensive panel presses) in order to keep its price at a target of some $27,500. The termination of the $7500 federal EV tax credit is clearly going to be a headwind for the Slate; it’s dampened my enthusiasm some, having put down a refundable $50 deposit on one. But the seem to be moving forward, having just bought a factory to build it in, a former giant printing facility in Indiana.
Ford’s Maverick, whose sales have shown a healthy growth trajectory, isn’t exactly all-that compact with a 200″ overall length. But in relative terms, its low profile, lighter weight and standard FWD platform with available hybrid powertrain (and AWD) that it shares loosely with the Escape does make it the first passenger-car based pickup here in some time, discounting the ill-fated Subaru Baja. The real significance of the Maverick is that it is Ford’s lowest cost new vehicle (now starting at $29,840), and as such shows how trucks are increasingly displacing passenger cars in the heart of the market, even the entry-level one.
As to Ford’s upcoming (likely in 2027) sub-$30k EV pickup, there’s been no spy shots or other information about its exact size and format, but it will apparently have a standard double cab like the Maverick, so it’s fairly safe to assume it will be roughly similar in those metrics. Its platform will also underpin other variants, presumably including a CUV and small van. That will likely put some additional pressure on the Slate, but perhaps it can carve out a niche for itself. It’s going to depend on whether it can gain enough momentum, as that is what it seems to take nowadays. Nobody wants to buy a “loser”, regardless of the objective qualities. That’s the issue Hyundai is fighting against with its Santa Fe.
The failure of the BRAT, VW Pickup and Rampage back in the early ’80s isn’t exactly a good omen for these two new entrants. But then the Maverick has already paved the way, so I wouldn’t bet against them. And trucks have been expanding their domain year after year, so it’s quite easy to see the market expanding further at the bottom end. My bet is it’s going to be different this time around, although being pure EVs may not be in their favor. But the basic format is not likely to go away as it did once before.
Related CC Reading
Curbside Classic: 1982 Dodge Rampage – No Thanks; We Like Our Pickups Extra Large by PN
Trailhead Classic: 1978 Subaru BRAT – Subie Doo by PN
Curbside Classic: 1980 Volkswagen Pickup – Beating The Tariff, But Taking A Beating by Dave Skinner
Makes me wonder, what If Chrysler used the standard “Omnirizon” (or “Horni”, if you will) front end on the Rampage, instead of the 024/Turismo. Surely wouldn’t have helped sales, but I still wonder.
Talk about a “Pistol Grip” shifter.. Literally.
My Grandfather had a Rampage (That’s pretty much the end of my story).
I reckon they based it on the hatchback coupes primarily because those were 2-doors with a longer door that made for easier ingress/egress and access to storage behind the seats, and of course the El Camino was always derived from a 2-door car for that reason.
We only have to look at VW’s Rabbit-based pickup to see how awkward and stubby its proportions look, with the short front doors taken from the 4-door. I once saw photos (alas, can’t find any now) of one someone cobbled together by splicing the front half of a 2-door Rabbit with its longer doors to the back half of a pickup, and the result was much more harmonious looking.
Yes, that’s is the obvious reason.
Well, the Rampage was the absolute worst of both worlds, terrible car and a worse truck.
But the compact truck market never really went away, they just were not making them anymore, I have a really nice 2000 Tacoma 4wd (manual, reg cab, hand crank windows, no abs, no cruise, just perfect) and it was $18K new and I could get that for it now. Plenty of market for them but they will be unibody, electric, etc. Arguably not a truck.
Ford seems to have a thought that there is a future for a modern CV2. Bare bones, rural, minimal, shaped to haul. Not certain if there’s profit there, but getting a good Ford into garages is still a good thing for domestic auto manufacturing and pro-environmental to boot.
I remember the Rampage being quite popular at the time. They sure disappeared quickly!
The only pickup I’ve ever driven [ or ever will ] was one of these.
It will be interesting to see how the pickup market shakes out over the next 5 years or so. In addition to the EVs that are on the way Ram is reportedly planing on reentering the mid size market and Hyundai has announced they want in on the mid size truck market too.
As far as the Slate goes I don’t expect it to sell in any significant, ie profitable, numbers. The lack of the tax credit makes for a massive relative increase in price. Presuming that pricing stays on track the fact that the Ford offering will include 2 extra doors, a rear seat, have a choice of colors and presumably an infotainment system for “only $2500 more” will put significant pressure on the Slate’s pricing and limit its appeal. Of course by the time both make it to market who knows what the pricing will be.
Ford of course has a trick up its sleeve to ensure the plant is able to run at a profitable rate. That of course is that the platform is designed for “up to 8 body styles”. So they can keep adding models to the line until the reach that sweet spot of volume.
No matter what it will definitely be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Japan began with smaller utes then went large, China seems to have started at large and may evolve smaller, I had a huge pickup behind me on the expressway even in the mirror the immense BYD on the grille was readable in reverse, theres lots pf them on the roads so they sized it right for the market and its cheaper than a top spec ranger and likely more reliable than Fords effort now they are using a bad engine
Wish we could have small pickups, but thanks to DC and the truck makers that isn’t happening. If our lawmakers put a time limit or a if they aren’t making them any more on laws then we wouldn’t suffer. Now we have a bunch of four door trucks with small beds, Thanks truck makers and DC!
Reckon we’re seeing small(er) pickups again as EVs and hybrids because those aren’t as disincentivized by our absurd CAFE regulatory scheme that scales MPG targets to a “footprint” formula that smaller vehicles often can’t realistically attain with acceptable performance that buyers actually want to buy.
It’s little-appreciated that the Rampage had a true half-ton payload rating. My dad had an ’84 Rampage for several years, sharp looker in black with red pinstripes, machined-face turbine-style alloy wheels, and a black vinyl tonneau cover over the bed. Did all the occasional hauling duty he needed as a homeowner and volunteer groundskeeper at our church, meanwhile serving as a sporty, fun-to-drive and economical work commuter and household second vehicle.
To be practical, all these small pickups need a rear bed cap, so why not a reliable Transit Connect that doesn’t come from Turkey? VW has already had its Caddy van variant for a long time. Yes please something reliable & not Ev ,because in America we have not been spoiled with the NV200 and the ProMaster City. I digress into the world of mini panel vans because the front of a ICE pick-up truck , even a mini one , is simply an ode to the inefficiency of space utilization.
None of the 3 former purveyors of small commercial vans in the US sell them any longer. Either they weren’t profitable, or they weren’t popular enough.
Largely because none were reliable. One made in Türkiye another with a Jatco and the next was a “Fix It Again Tony”. I can understand that buyers may turn to a rear-wheel drive with a traditional chassis. A.k.a. a Pick-up.
In the case of the Nissan, it still has to be done: a simple rear beam and rear tires that wear out without common sense. Bombardment of pickup truck ads also penetrates deeply into the reptilian brains of consumers.You will never see an ad for a panel van that also serves as a camper on weekends or in which you can store ATV.
You can blame the Maverick and Bronco Sport’s popularity for the lack of a compact van in the US.
The original plan for the plant in Mexico was for it to build the new Transit Connect along side the other two to ensure that the plant utilization rate was at a profitable level. It was supposed to be offered with the same hybrid powertrain as the Mav. The problem was the BS and Mav far exceeded Ford’s projections. They had to increase capacity at the plant several times to keep up with demand. Even then they didn’t have enough batteries for the hybrids.
They did share with their dealers that a “Maverick based van” is coming. At that time it sounded like it was due fairly soon, but they now say that production is scheduled to start in 2028.
https://fordauthority.com/2025/08/ford-maverick-based-van-still-happening-production-set-for-2028/
The market may be changing .
I hope so even though I won’t be buying another pickup before I die .
Crackerjack pickups were nice and oh so handy, for me the bed must be long enough to carry a single Motocycle, my 2001 Ford Ranger can carry my old Motocycle is I put it diagonally in the bed .
I have shortish legs, 32″ yet the Ford Courier and Datsun “Lil Hustler” pickups were pretty snug and not comfortable for longer drives, this is a critical aspect of any motor vehicles that wants to sell to the U.S.A. market .
Greg, you’re dead wrong ~ lack of sales is what killed the mini truck market, not the government .
-Nate
I had friends with all of those early trucks, Datsun, Toyota, Mazda/Ford and LUV. They were all quite cramped, which of course why the Datsun King Cab was such a big hit and the later B-Series/Courier got a small stretch of their cab.
From YouTube videos from the press day the Slate’s cab didn’t look too roomy to me and the driving position reminded me of those early mini trucks.