In late 2002, my father sought to replace our beloved 1994 Ford Aerostar with something newer, more reliable, and large enough to carry our family of five. He settled on what was, at the time, the cheapest three-row SUV on the market, a silver 2002 Suzuki XL-7 Grand Vitara.

As far as I can tell, the XL-7 was selected for three reasons: 1) it was cheap; 2) it had 4-wheel-drive; and 3) it had a third row. It was not a terrible car. It had a 2.7-liter V6 that made adequate horsepower and was reliable enough to never need a major service in our ownership. It had a four-speed automatic, which, like the V6, never needed major service. It did nothing wrong and was a perfectly competent, if thoroughly mediocre, SUV for family duty. However, despite its admirable reliability, it would be the most problematic car we ever owned, and we all came to hate it in the five years it stayed with us.

The problems began immediately. Its shortcomings were evident on the drive home. My father paid for three rows, which meant we were to use three rows. Being the youngest and smallest, I was relegated to the rear-most seat any time all five of us piled into the car. Because we had to bring my brother back to the hospital, my first ride in the XL-7 was in that seat. Despite being a smaller-than-average 8 year-old, there was not enough legroom for me in there. And because I was a young child, my criticisms were largely ignored, and spent many road trips with my knees jammed against the back of the middle row. As I grew–which thankfully I did quite slowly–the rear seat only became more and more intolerable until finally, I was allowed to sit in the middle seat of the middle row. This likely contributed to my siblings’ hatred for the XL-7, as I was now taking up valuable shoulder room–especially important for my much quicker-growing brother.
My mother’s hatred of the XL-7, however, stems from the sheer number of accidents and near-misses she was involved in during the time she owned it. Within the first week of us having it, while my father was driving it, somebody nearly ran into it coming into a gas station–even after my father landed on the horn. This convinced my father that it needed a louder horn, and so he had one installed. It was then discovered by Mom that the car’s horn was improperly installed (specifically, it had been drilled into a vacuum line), and she found out her new car needed immediate service.
Then the accidents started happening.

The first accident was clearly not my mother’s fault. She was rear-ended in heavy traffic by somebody who said they did not see her. This explanation would come up so often that my mother became convinced the car was actually invisible. She was hit at least two more times just in traffic, and had several near misses by people who simply did not see the XL-7. The last accident happened in 2006, when some clown in a Ford Ranger took the XL-7’s front bumper off and then attempted to flee. Because his truck was branded all over with his employer’s phone number, he was found very quickly. He was fired even quicker than he was found. The kicker is that the driver was genuinely surprised he got caught. Eventually, nature itself turned on the XL-7 and threw an entire flock of morning doves at my mother one morning during her commute, necessitating a new windshield.
None of what befell the XL-7 was its own fault. It was always a perfectly competent SUV, and my father does not understand why we all hated it. In 2007, without any forewarning, my father traded it in on a brand new BMW 335i. I felt no sadness at its absence, and even now, with the benefit of hindsight and the ability to understand the irrationality of my hatred for it, I still do not miss it.
Note: Lead photo from the CC Cohort by canadiancatgreen.
























This was not a good choice for a family SUV. The XL-7 was just a Grand Vitara/Chevy Tracker that had been lengthened to make room for that very tiny third seat. It was done for marketing reasons, but quite inadequate. But that’s not the whole issue: these cars are not like the popular compact SUVs that were/are so popular, like the RAV4 and CRV. These Suzukis are genuine 4WD “trucks” with a full frame and a transfer case with part-time but genuine 4WD. As such, they make great off-roaders, but they are very narrow and have poor space utilization. Even the rear seat in our Tracker is utterly useless unless the front seats are moved forward.
There’s a strong following for all of these Suzukis and even the XL-7 has its fans, but not as a family hauler.
If I recall, they also got fairly abysmal fuel economy, 16 or 17mpg. That’s fine for an off-roader, but pretty bad for a family hauler.
Yep. These 5+2 SUVs are not great, and even less so when they include a longitude powertrain, a ladder frame and a solid rear axle…all of which take away space. The third row in my 2021 GX 460 was tiny for that reason.
The second-gen XL-7 (actually called XL7) would also be an extended-length version of a smaller vehicle…essentially a Chevy Equinox/Pontiac Torrent from the C-pillars forward and an extended-length rear floorpan that allowed for a suboptimal third row, though not worse than–say–a Toyota Highlander.
I remember these were mockingly called “Grand Viagra”.
My BiL bought one. Evidently on purpose. It may have replaced a smoking Montero, iirc. As a younger adult, on occasional visits with multi-generational family aboard, I often crawled to the 3rd row, so no other adults had to. I’m over that sh*t now. It was unpleasant even for a few minutes.
My sister’s family turned into Suzuki people. They also had a Tracker. They replaced the XL7 with an Equator, the Nissan Frontier clone.
I just saw an XL7 on Interstate 5. And in the last few weeks that I’ve been in Oregon, I’ve seen more Vitaras, Sidekicks and Trackets than in the past year in California. Rural Oregon loves its practical, inexpensive small 4WD’s.
Suzuki must have sold better with GM badging on their products sold through GM dealers. Suzuki pulled the plug on their dealership operation with cars under their own branding in 2013 in the US and 2014 in Canada.
This one looks almost identical to my 2000 Chevy Tracker, I have never seen one with a third row and can imagine how cramped it must be .
Yes, these are tiny little trucks, for this reason I love mine although I’ll never use the 4 wheel drive aspect, in fact I sourced a pair of manual front unlocking hubs to ease wear and perhaps increase the fuel economy a mile or two .
Mine gets 20 MPG on a regular basis, I wish it were higher but am okay with it as it’s a good driver, reliable and easily carries four full sized adults .
-Nate