Nope, I haven’t found a genuine Curbside Classic GTO, yet. There was a time when GTOs in this kind of condition were plentiful, but those days are pretty much gone, even in Beaterville, Oregon. But then lowly A-Body coupes in gray primer aren’t exactly dime-a-dozen anymore, and this one is an almost perfect time capsule from say, the late seventies or early eighties. That’s when every kid who fancied himself a goat could buy a Tempest or LeMans coupe from the woman down the street, who was now married with kids and had just bought a new Olds Cutlass Supreme.
Yes, GM really dominated this segment of the market, as we’ve documented in the CC Complete Cutlass Chronicles. And although the Cutlass eventually rose to the top of the mid-sized heap, the Pontiacs acquitted themselves fairly well, thanks in large part to the huge success of the GTO. And although the GM A-Body coupes shared the same basic shell, the Pontiac’s distinctive beak made it highly unmistakable.
The GTO’s “Endura” body-colored nose gave it more street cred than ever, since one could tell it was the genuine article a block away. And the styling impact it made on the global industry is not to be underestimated. Let’s face it: the ’69 GTO’s front predicted every modern car: no chrome bumpers, and a face integrated into a soft-plastic front end. Pontiac was still at the height of its game.
Although the ’68 GTO was the high water mark in terms of sales (88k), not everyone could quite afford one,
like this very (trying hard to be) prim and demure secretary ready to take dictation: “Yes, Mr. Niedermeyer; what can I do for you?” Take off those ridiculous fake glasses, for starters. What agency sent you anyway? Oh, right; Sterling Cooper.
When I was hard at work setting a new record for how long one could last at Loyola High School without ever doing a stitch of homework (two years), there was a fund-raising raffle each fall. The prize was a low end Tempest, a ’68 and a ’69, obviously donated by an alum who owned a Pontiac store. They even had the OHC six, which frankly was not a common sight in these cars by this time.
I always thought it was pretty tacky to raffle a stripper car; I mean if you’re going to gamble, go for the gold. Or at least a nicely equipped LeMans coupe, which was by far the best seller of the bunch. But then it undoubtedly wouldn’t have come with the OHC six, which was an engine that had a powerful thrall over me at the time. I was much happier opening the hood of the prize car, and poring over its details than facing another Latin class with old Buck (seven of them per week!).
Little did I know at the time that 1969 would be the last year for that engine. It was a short run indeed, all of four years, before nobody gave a damn about it anymore. It was of course all part of the John DeLorean years at Pontiac, when the efforts to pop out of the GM gray-flannel suit approach resulted in everything from the rear transaxle – irs 1961 Tempest, to the OHC six.
In reality, the Sprint six never did quite fit where cars were going in the late sixties, as well as the price of gas, which continued to drop in inflation-adjusted real terms, and even more so in terms of the (then) growing real wages. By 1969, sixes were strictly for the (genuinely) primmest of secretaries, or raffle-mobiles.
This shot from the 1968 brochure shows not only the last gasp effort to market the higher-performance four-barrel Sprint six, but a specific car that I have never, ever seen in the world. In fact, I didn’t know it existed: a Tempest (not LeMans) convertible with the Sprint package. Now that’s probably worth something today; much rarer than the GTO by a long shot. “The Great Impostor” indeed. I might have assumed they were referring to the GTO, but the text refers to “those low-slung, high-priced jobs from across the sea”. Seriously, who were they really targeting the Sprint to? Austin-Healey 3000 buyers?
One of the problems with the Sprint six, in its 215/230 hp four barrel form, was that it really needed the four-speed stick to function as intended, as the Pontiac two-speed automatic made a very poor companion.
I’ve allowed myself to veer off (wide) track here, by focusing on the OHC six, which our featured car obviously doesn’t have. I’d guess 90% or more of these coupes came with the 350, which in two-barrel trim was rated at 265 (gross) horsepower. That made a decent-enough performing car, in the normal sense of the times. A 330 hp four-barrel version was also available.
That made the decisions fairly easy, because if you were buying a ’69 Pontiac with the 400 CID V8, there no less than nine versions available (265, 290, 330, 345, 350, 360, 366, 370 hp). Most of those were GTO variants. What I do know is that the 265 hp two-barrel 400 in a GTO (delete option) was not a fast car. One of the seniors at Loyola had a brand new red ’68 GTO, and one day we got him to give us a ride up up-hill Chestnut Avenue, at full throttle, and I was decidedly underwhelmed. His dad had obviously done the smart but sad thing, and ordered the goat with the two-barrel. Looked good, though.
So what’s left to say about this Tempest? No much. These GM coupes had a fairly decent ride-handling compromise, for the times. Classic GM: smooth, a bit too soft, crappy brakes unless the discs were on tap. The GM power steering was a bit better than average, unless one got really aggressive with it and it couldn’t keep up. Actually, I don’t think I ever drove one of these Pontiacs, but the 1970 Skylark I drove once or twice had a honey of a drive train. But then it had the Turbo-Hydramatic, while Pontiac was still saddling their fine motors with two-speed automatics in the smaller cars. Bad call.
But then the secretaries wouldn’t have cared, and if you won the stripper Tempest at the Loyola raffle, you’d just give it to your son or daughter anyway. And eventually, it would end up like this one, with a GTO spoiler and some cheap mag wheels. Impostor indeed.














That was a good one.
The Wikipedia article on this car has an interesting story about a “Pontiac ET” model the brass rejected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_Custom_S
Some Pontiac dealers and tuners, I guess, saw or had heard of the “Pontiac ET” and they created their own thing like the Tempest Magnum 400 offered by Knatel Pontiac http://ultimategto.com/cgi-bin/showcar.cgi?type=lot&pic=/1970/70_00306_2
Another one, Stampede Pontiac-Buick in Calgary, Alberta did also its own thing with the Le Mans “The Jury” as a low-cost alternative to the Judge. I guess. There one picture at http://amateurdebeauxchars.forumactif.com/t19185-1970-pontiac-lemans-the-jury and a scan from a old magazine at http://www.myspace.com/1964gto/photos/12025364
My first-grade teacher had a ’69 Le Mans when I was in her class in 1973. It probably had the six and the two-speed.
I ran the prices from the one ad through an inflation calculator and found that the non-stripper Custom S cost, in 2011 dollars, only a grand more than the bare-bones Tempest. So why in heaven’s name would anybody not buy the Custom S over the Tempest?
Maybe the payment for the Tempest was already a stretch. Maybe it was the insurance. Maybe most people didn’t know or care about the difference. Surely most people didn’t appreciate that OHC-6. Why buy a six when “I could’ve had a V8″?
In ’69 Dad told us we were getting that new rubber-nosed GTO. Then one day we weren’t. Must have been the insurance.
I had the same thought. But there were folks who went for them, like my father and his stripper ’68 Dart. Truth is, I hardly ever saw a true base Tempest coupe of that vintage. The kind of buyers that went to a Pontiac store inevitably bought at least the Custom S or the LeMans. Dart and Valiants are in a different league.
I would agree. I think that GM buyers were more style-concious in those days, and were less prone to get cars with a below-average level of pizzaz.
Ford and Mopar buyers, on the other hand, . . . . .
like this very prim and demure secretary ready to take dictation…
The first thing I’d tell her is “Take off that silly tweed jacket so I can get a look at you…” Though perhaps I shouldn’t say that as a man who will have a secretary some day… lol.
These weren’t bad as long as you ordered them correctly. – Though that just described GM for the majority of the companies history.
In my *dreams* that secretary is wearing the I dream of Jeannie costume beneath that silly tweed jacket.
A friend of my mom’s (another young mom of course) had a LeMans coupe from this era, and traded it for a Colonnade-era Pontiac wagon when it got unwieldy for the kids. (Similarly, my mom had a two-door Impala hardtop, and traded it for a Torino wagon when it got unwieldy for us.)
The Pontiac “Yes” ad, speaking of Sterling Cooper and ads, is almost certainly an intentional echo of this one for Coke:
From when Coke was the best penetrating fluid you could buy
Great car and a great piece on it. I think that most of these Tempests got turned into GTO clones a long time ago.
When I was a kid, the Bordner family next door had a whole string of Pontiacs. The dad preferred more basic models, including a 67 LeMans Sprint with the OHC 6 and a 70 Firebird 6. But the mom, well, she was a GTO girl, with a 66, a 68 and a 71. One of the older kids had a 67-69 Firebird as well.
John DeLorean got transferred to head up Chevrolet early in the 1969, IIRC. In fairness to his successor, the 14th floor execs were calling more and more of the shots by that time, and any exec that was less of a renegade than DeLorean (meaning about all of them except for maybe John Beltz at Oldsmobile) was going to have trouble getting anything done.
The 14th floor really hated DeLorean. He was actually going to be fired back in ’64 when they found out about his end-run loophole with the GTO (DeLorean made it an option instead of a separate model line). Of course, when the GTO became a wild success, that couldn’t happen.
Ironically, because of DeLorean, the 14th floor started monitoring and dictating, more than ever, the actions of the other divisions. It’s worth noting that the Chevy Vega was the first car to come out of that environment.
And the 14th floor would eventually get their revenge on DeLorean, too. When he finally made it to the 14th floor, he didn’t last long. DeLorean may have quit but it’s generally accepted that he would have been fired if he hadn’t.
I don’t remember seeing a Tempest Sprint either, but there was of course the contemporaneous Firebird Sprint, with the same little side stripe. Quite a nice-looking car, and apparently it did get a heavy-duty suspension, floor-mounted shifter, and more horses than the standard six …
There were a few friends’ families that had a LeMans as the second car, with a station wagon as the fmaily hauler. I never saw a stripper (car) either. Most everyone had well equipped cars – power steering, brakes, A/C, rarely power windows or locks.
Always liked these a friend years ago had one 400 motor but it had lots of money spent under the hood and went well 4 speed box a classic 70s street rod, I havent seen one in years now good find.
I suspect that the reason the grille looks so furry in the clue photo is that it got sprayed with gray primer without being cleaned first.
To comment on your “rarer than rare”…after college graduation I ordered my first new car, a 1967 Tempest Custom Convertible with the Sprint package and 4-speed. As I recall about the only other options were power steering and brakes, radio and vinyl interior. It was burgundy/black/black. I had it about 5 years and 40K miles and sold it to a co-worker.
I still dream about that car.
The ’66 and ’67 Sprints were a bit more common; I remember seeing a few here and there. And they got a fair bit of coverage in the magazines. But I didn’t even know they still offered the Sprint package for ’68; never saw one or a test of one, or any other mention of it.
During the late sixties I was really enthralled by the Pontiac Overhead Cam 6. I had the opportunity to buy a ’69 Firebird with the Sprint 6 option at Dealer cost-and turned it down. I’ve kicked myself ever since, I could of had a collectors item.
Hey, that’s a pretty darn nice stripper car for the high school raffle compared to what came along a few years later. By 1975, at my high school, the raffle car was a stripped down Pinto. It was the ultra basic model with the trunk instead of the rear hatch. I had to go to a shopping center one afternoon with the sad looking thing and try to convince people to buy tickets.
My father had a 67 Le Mans with a 326ci engine, a 2hole carb, and a 2 speed auto. It was white with a high quality red vinyle interior.
We had a foreign exchange studet named Martin and we stayed in touch with him after he returned home. Later, he and his brother came to visit. They had nothing but distain for American cars, but nevertheless accepted my father’s invitation to drive the Pontiac on a six week tour of parts west of Iowa. When they returned, they couldn’t say enough good things about the car. They loved it
That’s not an uncommon experience.
My brother signed with the Cleveland Indians out of high school and got a $3000 signing bonus. It was 1968 and another brother of mine was an engineer at Pontiac Motors. They optioned out a Le Mans in dark green that had every high speed option available from Pontiac. Basically the most powerful GTO with a Le Mans label.
I drove it once, the clutch required a lot of muscle.
Chalk it up as another GM Deadly Sin…or a deadly tendency, anyway. Go to the effort of breaking ground with an OHC motor – and then not sell it; cripple it behind a two-speed slushbox. Let the buyers think it’s “just another six” and have them order just another V8.
Pontiac was in a habit of doing that. The slant 4 was a truly interesting concept, with the “rope drive” and a rear transaxle; and yet the first I knew of it was right here. Those cars were all around when I was a kid, and yet nobody knew or talked about what a unique drivetrain they had, or how it gave perfect weight balance.
Engineer it, and then not sell it – and have the R&D cost wasted as it’s dropped. What, did the suits WANT this stuff to fail? Did they find badge-engineering more exciting? Probably.
And that, in the end, was why GM did in fact fail. They had the people and the resources; but they had this burning drive to do things on the cheap. To screw the public; to make cookie-cutter cars that fell apart exactly when paid for. The public, unfortunately for them, had other ideas – and took their expectations elsewhere.
I forgot to say in my post that Martin was from Germany, and would tell me stories about his family traveling over the Alps in a VW 1200cc with 37 horsepower. No wonder he liked the Pontiac
Glad to see Tempest called its correct name!. What annoys me is younger car fans, born long after 1970, calling any 64-72 LeMans/Tempest/etc a “GTO”, as if that was only mid sized car Pontiac sold in the 60′s. Another myth online I’ve seen is ‘Mustang was Ford’s answer to the GTO in 1964′ NO way!
One time Jalopnik posted a ‘Found on street’ 69 Custom S and called it ‘some kind of weird looking GTO’, I was ready to reach into the internet and shake the ‘auto writer’.
And yes young car buffs, some GTO’s came with bench seats and column shfiters, even vinyl tops and automatic trans. Only the 74 had a ‘small block’* 350.
* The is no such thing as a Pontiac small block motor.
UNTRUE BY ALL F¥€<ING ACCOUNTS CHICAGOLAND!!! They exist, but their numbers are very few, and they include myself. Now you know Chicagoland. Now you know.
Are you ok, Alfasaab99? You seem a bit agitated.
My apology for this very late addition to the above comment string, which just appeared in the CC search : My father purchased a ’68 Firebird Sprint with the M4. I bought it from him and drove it until ’83 when the rust mites had pretty much eaten its fenders away. Sold it Iowa Red Title to a collector, not a salvage yard, but no idea what occurred from that point, although it was parked in his driveway with new plates a couple weeks later. Means it had passed its initial state inspection. THAT WAS A REAL FUN DRIVE. Went where it was pointed, and got there fast! Very comfortable. Easy seven hundred mile days. Great mileage while doing that. And the OHC 6 itself was its own kind of beautiful, almost a work of art just in itself. Have often wondered how this particular OHC 6 would work today, updated with modern electronics&fuel injection etc. [Or the Chrysler Slant 6, particularly its hemi version that I understand was only sold&driven in Australia.] The number of near misses along the way since WW2 in TheStates’ car business remains incredibly frustrating. Just another real-life example of the good dieing young, apparently. [Used to be amusing to observe the station attendant start to open the Firebird hood. That lever was way underneath&back. Almost all the time I had to explain how to find that, but once or twice the attendant just reached and then answered, “Yes,” when asked if he–they were always men forty&thirty years ago–also drove a ‘bird?
My Dad did me a real favor buying a 10 year old 67 For me To drive when I got My License. Later When I had my Mustang GT 89, 10 yrs old, it felt much like(Better-ConV) the V8 FireBird as I Remember it.
I just bought this 1969 custom s for 3000.00runs and drives. What’s the scoop on them as to a gto